ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast A Sound Of Thunder

792 Words4 Pages

Paying 10,000 dollars to go back in the past and kill a dinosaur, sounds like an amazing time. “A Sound of Thunder”, written by Ray Bradbury, is a wonderful short film and story. It delivers a strong idea that will make many wonder. Ray Bradbury is also able to express such a lively feeling with his descriptive style of writing. Now, between the story and film, there are many similarities and differences such as the path and the missing oxygen helmets. There are also a couple things that would be changed if instead of Bradbury, I myself wrote the story.

Believe it or not, “A Sound of Thunder” has a few similarities between the short film and the story. One major resemblance in both the film and story is the path. The path is a metal, …show more content…

In the beginning of “A Sound of Thunder”, before Eckels enters the time machine, he tells the man behind the desk he is glad Keith is president. They go on to discuss the other candidate, Deutscher, and how he would have been a terrible choice. I believe this part of the story is pretty pointless because it does not really go into detail of the two candidates, explaining deeply why one was good and one was not. Taking this out and putting a description of the time machine in great detail would have been better. The reason for this is because the story does not contain a description of it at all, and the time machine held an important part. Moving on, another part of the story that will be better differently is when Bradbury went on to describe the death of the tyrannosaurus. Bradbury describes it in such detail, it is kind of overwhelming. Taking out the part where he describes the tyrannosaurus falling after being shot, and adding dialogue between Travis and Eckels would make it greatly better. The reason for this is because Travis needs to yell at Eckels for backing out, since Eckels technically agreed not to by going on the trip. Lastyly, the ending. The ending is short and abrupt, making the readers of it wondering and confused. Bradbury needs to explain how killing Eckels can make things start over, instead of just ending it with “A Sound of

Open Document