The overall collective findings of Asch, Milgram, and Zimbardo in their conformity experiments were that we don’t truly understand why people do the things they do. Although some individuals do not question or act out on certain terms, others tend to disobey the overall authority.
In Asch’s experiment there was a card with a single line drawn on it. Participants were then asked to pick between three other lines on a different card to match the length of the original line. It was a simple test to see if the participants would be able to establish the perfect match. Asch threw in experimental subjects that were also working with him to see if the rest of the research subjects would go along with them. As the professors participants gave purposely wrong answers the conformity in the other participants started to happen. Many of the participants
…show more content…
Next we have social psychologist, Stanley Milgram. The psychologist wanted to learn what it would take to have everyday individuales cause another individual harm, just because they were asked to. He proposed this experiment right after WWII to test if Germans were aimlessly following Hitler. The subjects of said experiment were told that they were giving a painful situation to a stranger they thought had answered wrongly in some sort of learning training. The main idea of this experiment was to broadcast the harm people would deliver when instructed to do so, as it says in the text. Lastly we have Professor Zimbardo. Zimbardo set up an experiment with 75 volunteers to take a role in a mock prison as a guard or a prisoner. Although