Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brief outline of milgram experiment
Psychology essay on conformity
Milgram experiment 5
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brief outline of milgram experiment
Psychology essay on conformity
Milgram experiment 5
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The teacher would be the lab rat thinking he was administering a shock for each fallacious response, and with each erroneous reply the shock would intensify. The astonishing fact was all participants would continue to 300 volts, which would precipitate extreme torment. Furthermore, two-thirds would proceed on to shock the learner with 450 volts, which would result in death, hypothetically.
The followers in Jonestown executed every task Jones asked them to, and this decreases cult member’s agency because they become less responsible for their actions. Those in Jonestown followed every order their leader commanded to please him, and this is exactly what happened in the Stanley Milgram Experiment. The American Psychological Association states, “In the middle of the jungle in Guyana, South America, nearly 1,000 people drank lethal cyanide punch or were shot to death, following the orders of their leader, Jim Jones… And when people are uncertain, they look to others for cues on what to do, research has shown.” Jones’ church members were willing to do anything for him, even kill themselves.
Would people actually issue a shock that could be potentially fatal to the person they are issuing the test to? The biggest part of this was the influence of the “professor” that was in the room with the “teachers”. Whenever a particularly large shock was issued to the “learner” he would cry out in pain. This caused several people to question whether
Psychologist, Stanley Milgram, wanted to know if people would cause harm on other humans simply because they were ordered to do so (he was inspired by Nazi soldiers, who corrected their actions in World War II by saying they were just following orders). Milgram designed an experiment where participants were told they were testing a learning technique, where a student had to learn a word pattern, and were punished by electric shock if they got the answer wrong. The “student” was an assistant of Milgram’s, but the participant, who was the “teacher” and the person to give the electric shock, thought this person was just an innocent participant. The teacher would read out a question, and if the student (who sat in an adjacent room, where they
1. What rationale do the author(s) give for conducting the study? The author that is conducting this research is testing the obedience of a subject when dealing with “stocking a victim” by use of a shock generator. There are thirty levels of shock that are generated varying from a slight shock to a severe shock.
The first run had the learner get 3 answers correct and 7 answers wrong, resulting in a shock of 105 volts. In the second run, the teacher was told to read a list of words until the learner got the correct pair which meant that the teacher would have to increase the voltage up to 450 volts which were labeled as “Danger Severe Shock”. At around 300 volts the learner would start kicking against the wall and not respond to the teacher anymore. If the teacher failed to shock the learner the experimenter would give 4 responses that urged the teacher to administer the shock. The experimenter would either say “ Please Continue”, “The experiment requires that you continue”, “It is essential that you continue”, or finally “ You have no other choice you must go on”.
Deception from a moral viewpoint would be something that is seen as wrong, but in a study or experiment for research I think deception is something that is necessary to gain certain knowledge that we wouldn 't be able to gain using regular methods. Usually, the ends justify the means to a deceptive experiments and they usually have good intentions behind them. Many people may be angry after the experiment is over but it is shown that people enjoy an experiment with deception more than an experiment without deception; and people also benefit from them more, educationally. I believe deception is a necessary tool for learning about human behavior and human reaction. Deceptive experiments are experiments that really make you think when the experiment
Subjects were told to shock a person who they believed to also be a subject if they answered a question wrong. The people getting shocked were actors and were not actually receiving electrical shocks. Many of the subjects continued to give high voltage shocks because they were told to. This experiment was viewed as unethical because of the emotional stress it put on the subjects.
The "Obedience to Authority Paradigm" abbreviated as OTA has been a field of interest for psychologists, sociologists and countless others who till this very day try to create a comprehensive and holistic theory of obedience. According to Jetten and Mols (2014), Milgram designed an experiment to yield the highest obedience rates and to decrease or even omit disobedience, resulting in the predicted outcomes after having had a vast amount of pilot
People obey authority because they are aware of possible consequences if they disobey. This is shown through the four aspects of people obeying to avoid responsibility, be part of something bigger than themselves, pleasing authority, and being in a group with others and having your own opinion. In 1961 Stanley Milgram conducted a controversial experiment. The design of the experiment is very basic. It involves 3 people.
Participants were ordered to ask the learners a series of questions, and if they got them incorrect, they would give them a shock which gradually got more powerful with each question that they missed. The learner was really just a voice recording, so there was not anyone truly being shocked, but the teachers were under the impression that the experiment was real. Each time the learner got a question wrong, the teacher shocked the learner. The learner would wince from pain, and it would get louder and more aggressive as the experiment went on. Some of the participants wanted to stop the experiment because they didn't want
During the Stanford prison experiment the actual boys who agreed to do the experiment had no idea what it was, they thought it would be a fun idea to help out with an experiment. The only reason why the experiment stopped after only a week was because a women who was one of the people behind it saw the prisoners walking to the bathroom and they had bags on their heads and they were in single file and she got upset. She was upset because they lost the purpose of the experiment and actually turned these boys into
Life lacks a clear line in the sand that spells out where the limits are. People must figure that out themselves and, often, it is difficult to do so. The difficulty lies in the fear of being wrong and no one wants to own up to their errors. So, on a deep level, authority is comforting. It gives people someone to rely on, someone to take orders from, and someone to place blame onto.
The Milgram experiment began in July 1961 carried out by Stanley Milgram. His decision to conduct this experiment was “he was concerned that the holocaust would happen again in American, that as a Jew his family would be put in a concentration camp. His question was “would you kill if a person in an authority figure told you to do so, someone like Hitler?” (Stanley Milgram: Obedience to Authority Video 01:00-01:16).
It does so by having the subjects all placed in the same environment with the same instructions. The subjects’ job is to shock the “learners” if they give out incorrect answers. The learners are actors implanted by the experimenters. The shocking increases the more answers they get wrong. Some of the “learners” being shocked are literally begging for the shocking to stop, some even faked death yet almost all of the subjects continued the shocking.