ipl-logo

What Guideline Did They Violate?

1622 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical issues of the stanford prison experiment

Hindsight bias- the likelihood that a person claims an event to be predictable after the event occurred Critical thinking- the thought process that uses different skills, patterns, and strategies in order to form a judgement Theory- an idea that is not proven but that is believed to be true Hypothesis- a statement that controls an experiment that demonstrates the relationship between things Operational definition- describes the actions or operations that will be used to measure or control a variable, in a study Replication- redoing a study in order to ensure that the findings of the previous study are correct Case study- a detailed examination of an individual’s thoughts, behaviors, and actions Naturalistic observation- observing an individual or a group in their natural environment, …show more content…

Name and describe three experiments that violated ethical guidelines. What guideline did they violate? Milgram: The Milgram experiment was an experiment that tested an individual's willingness the follow the instructions of an authority figure. Subjects were told to shock a person who they believed to also be a subject if they answered a question wrong. The people getting shocked were actors and were not actually receiving electrical shocks. Many of the subjects continued to give high voltage shocks because they were told to. This experiment was viewed as unethical because of the emotional stress it put on the subjects. Stanford Prison: The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment conducted at Stanford University where a mock prison was set up. Normal healthy men were split into groups of the guards and the prisoners. The two different groups conformed to their role very quickly, which resulted in physical and verbal abuse by the guards and a sense of weakness in the prisoners. This experiment was unethical because it led to lasting emotional trauma in many of the prisoners. Also Zimbaro, the leader of the experiment, found it impossible to stay neutral during the

Show More
Related
751 Words | 4 Pages

In summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

During Stanley Milgram’s 1960’s study, he made subjects believe that they were harming another subject in order to test obedience. He did this by having the subject ask an actor, who was pretending to be another subject, to remember a word out of a series of words. Whenever the actor fail to get the word correct, the subject would flip a switch that he believe was administering an increasing electric charge. They were told not to stop and to continue increasing the voltage even after the actor began yelling and begging them to stop, and even after he stopped responding all together. The study was to see just how far people are willing to go to follow the orders of an authoritative figure.

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

In the Milgram shock experiment, participants were told to shock a “tester” when they got a wrong answer. This was staged so that the tester would almost always get the wrong answer. The goal was to see how far a participant was willing to increase the shock strength when presented with an order. According to Khan Academy “Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work became patently clear, and they were asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority” (Khan Academy). The article also states, “When the results of the study came out, they were actually really disturbing because 65% of participants shocked all the way” (Khan Academy).

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a research study administered by Philip Zimbardo in 1971, which gathered twenty-four men to be put into a pseudo-jail to see the impacts of prison on the guards and inmates. Twelve of these volunteers were randomly selected to be inmates and the other twelve became guards. Not surprisingly, the inmates endured incredible torment and a few of them had psychological collapses due to severe emotional distress. The guards were consumed with their own power and felt little sympathy for the inmates that were under their care and stripped them, whipped them, dehumanized them. The research was expected to keep going for two weeks; however it went on for only six days due to the inmates encountering damaging levels

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

Homework: Unethical Studies The Stanford Prison Experiment was done by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo in an actual prison-like setting. He conducted this experiment to see how people responded to a cruel environment without any clear set of rules. They wanted to test the power of the environment to change and transform otherwise normal peoples everyday behavior. After an extensive series of psychological tests, Dr. Zambardo and his team selected 24 of the most healthy and “normal” people that responded to his add in the paper.

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

The experiments became popular when trying to understand what having power (in this situation the role of the guards) would do to a normal person. The article The Stanford Prison Experiment explains the experiment and its process. After running for 6 days, it revealed there was real danger of someone being mentally or physically harmed if it continued. The experiment was said to have proved that people easily conform to the social roles they are given (McLeod 2-3). This, however, can be proven wrong in many ways.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.

Read More
1575 Words | 7 Pages

The Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment is an infamous study that caught the eye of the world and has been taught about in universities and classrooms. This experiment was conducted in 1971, when psychologists Philip Zimbardo and researchers initially set out to form an experiment that observed the impact of becoming a prison guard and prisoner. The researchers wanted to know how the participant would react when placed in a prison simulation. This simulation was conducted in the basement of Stanford University’s psychology building.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Your intellectual and emotional reaction to what you read. Regardless of how useful the founding of this experiment was, I found it highly disturbing that these prisoners were practically treated as “lab rats”. The experiments were not carried out on none human subjects before they were introduced to the experiment. Also, I think that experimenting on a highly influencable population is just plain wrong.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

They also concluded that the environment of the prison played a vital role in the way the guards treated the prisoners. It is believed that this experiment changed the way some U.S. prisons are

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Following the experiment participants were debriefed and they were informed that the shock apparatus was not real and that the protests from the learners were scripted. Many of the subjects expressed emotional upset as they thought that they were inflicting immense pain on another person and that the high voltage shocks that they apparently administered had the capacity to kill

Read More
1613 Words | 7 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity, in particular to the real word circumstances of prison life. It was conducted by in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

During the Stanford prison experiment the actual boys who agreed to do the experiment had no idea what it was, they thought it would be a fun idea to help out with an experiment. The only reason why the experiment stopped after only a week was because a women who was one of the people behind it saw the prisoners walking to the bathroom and they had bags on their heads and they were in single file and she got upset. She was upset because they lost the purpose of the experiment and actually turned these boys into

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

The experiment was executed well. Yet, there are unethical practices happened during the experiment. First, the participants were not fully informed about the experiment. The researchers did not explain to the participants the processes in conducting the experiment. The participants were not informed that they would be arrested by cops in their homes.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Journey Into Authoritarian Leadership Over the years, scientists, psychologists, and doctors have used social experiments to further their understanding of our surroundings. Social experiments are studies of the human mind and psyche through various environments. In this case, a social experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment is what opened new doors for the comprehension of human behavior, how we act when we are in power, as well as offered a glimpse into the flaws in our legal system. This experiment was conducted in 1971 in Palo Alto, California.

Read More

More about What Guideline Did They Violate?

Related Topics

Open Document