ipl-logo

Stateville Prison Experiment Essay

445 Words2 Pages

2. Your overview of the content of your report. The Stateville Penitentiary inmates were subjects to biomedical experiments that the United States Military sponsored. This prison had a special architectural design that made observation of prisoners unnoticed due to its unique layout. Prisoners were enticed to volunteer to enter the research project as a part of their prison sentence, but promised early release, and some financial compensation. They not only served as research subjects in the two years long experiment, but also had role in the project to work with the researchers regardless being unqualified for this type of work. Participating prisoners received some compensations to participate in the project. Furthermore, risk and side effects of the treatment were not fully disclosed to the subjects. The military did not want to expose their valuable soldiers to such an experiment; therefore, it only seemed logical to use the “useless” members of society to search for a much needed cure for Malaria. Subjects were used to incubate the malaria parasites and feed the infected mosquitos (vectors) with their own blood during the experiments. Knowingly infect a healthy subject with infectious agent is highly unethical. However, it was not the only concern. In order to gain faster knowledge, researchers caused more suffering to the subjects than it was necessary. The drugs that the researchers were administering to …show more content…

Your intellectual and emotional reaction to what you read. Regardless of how useful the founding of this experiment was, I found it highly disturbing that these prisoners were practically treated as “lab rats”. The experiments were not carried out on none human subjects before they were introduced to the experiment. Also, I think that experimenting on a highly influencable population is just plain wrong. Knowingly infecting a person with a potentially deadly parasite is absolutely unacceptable to me. It is a crule and heatrless act. 4. Name and

Show More
Related
1222 Words | 5 Pages

They were put in cells the size of dog kennels, starved, dehydrated, used as test subjects for experiments in biological and chemical warfare, and beaten on the daily (187).

Read More
1334 Words | 6 Pages

Prisoners were tested on, “prisoners nationwide were being used for research of all kinds - from testing chemical warfare agents to determining how x-raying testicles affected sperm count” (Skloot 129). Some of the prisoners volunteered to be used as a test subject while many others did not. Southam injected cancerous cells into more than 600 people, mostly cancer patients to begin with, and proceeding with healthy patients to see if it would make a difference; “Since people with cancer seemed to reject the cells more slowly than the healthy people did, he thought that by timing the reaction rate, he might be able to find undiagnosed cases of cancer” (Skloot 130). However, the healthy patients were not aware of what Southam was injecting into their bodies, if the patients were to ask about what he was doing to them, he would say that he was testing them for cancer but in all reality he was injecting cancer into their bodies.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

In 1825, Kentucky prison authorities used the method in developing their prison at Frankfurt. The same system was also used in Missouri, Alabama, Texas and Louisiana. Now that we had a prison, who would manage

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

In order to research the theory of cancerous cells being infectious, two scientists traveled to an Ohio maximum security prison to conduct several experiments on prisoners. This testing involved taking the HeLa cells, and injecting the prisoners, to observe possible reactions. Despite the fact that the prisoners were informed of the risks, this experimentation was conducted intentionally to cause disease in another human being. This theory, however, was disproved as an infectious cancer because none of the test subjects developed full blown cancer.

Read More
1416 Words | 6 Pages

In an Ohio prison, 65 inmates were chosen to receive cancerous cells injections into their arms. These prisoners were chosen because they are in a vulnerable position in life with the loss of their freedom and identity. These prisoners are willing to do whatever it takes to not be in jail; this means agreeing to a potentially extremely dangerous situation in order to earn brownie points within the eyes of society. It was not until later in history when prison experiments became regulated because of prisoners’ inability to provide informed consent. These prisoners could use the experiment as a way to prove to the board that they are fit for society because they are participating in a help for

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

Second, The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study that was too inhumane to continue because of the behavior of the prison guards when handed with superiority and the mental breakdowns of the prisoners. E: “Now, you 'll all be given sunglasses and uniforms to give the prisoners a sense of a unified, singular authority… And from this point forward you should never refer to this as a study or experiment again,’’ (Dr. Phil Zimbardo).

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

Delving into the ethics behind the Stanford Prison Experiment done by Philip Zimbardo, it has come to the public’s attention the questionability as to whether or not the experiment had followed traditional scientific manner. If the research does not follow ethical guidelines, then there is reason to believe the Stanford Prison Experiment was corrupt due to the lack information to participants, and absence of human morals Mr. Zimbardo portrayed during the time of his findings. Ethical rules provide the guidelines used to identify what is wrong and right. These decisions occur with the daily lives of average people, influencing the way they interact with the world. In the Prison Experiment, participants were not fully disclosed information about the study, resulting in stressful measures and ultimately traumatizing those who took part.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

In this experiment, they would have prisoners only drink seawater. This would make the prisoners severely dehydrated. It got to the point where prisoners would lick recently mopped floors in order to be hydrated. Those who survived were brutally killed and thrown in the hole containing bodies. Secondly, there was a shot for Tuberculosis.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

For example, researchers are expected to protect participants from greater-than-usual harm or discomfort, including fear or embarrassment (Myers & DeWall 2019). Prisoners were told to do counts of pushups or jumping jacks and publicly insulted in front of other prisoners; they wore a single, loose nightgown with only a number–their new name– printed on it; they could even be sentenced to the hole, or solitary confinement, for up to an hour. Of course, these occurrences distinctly show the excessive cruelty the prisoners faced. At the time, there was very little regulation on research studies, but there is no doubt that these traumatic events affected the lives of participants, so Zimbardo faced no repercussions, but it is obvious that there was a severe level of negligence and malpractice on his part. Zimbardo had a responsibility as the ringleader of the study to keep everyone involved safe and stable, and he certainly failed to do so.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

On day six Zimbardo and Milgram decided to conclude the experiment. Zimbardo originally intended to explore how prisoners adapt to powerlessness, but he has contended that the experiment demonstrates how swiftly arbitrary assignment of power can lead to abuse. (Maher, The anatomy of obedience. P. 408) Once the experiment was completed Zimbardo and Milgram concluded that generally people will conform to the roles they are told to play.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Researchers didn’t have time to reflect on the conditions because they had to feed the “prisoners,” deal with parents of those involved, run a “parole board,” and “deal with” “prisoner” breakdowns. The experiment only ended after Christina Maslach, who married Zimbardo in 1972, saw the experiment and argued with Zimbardo to end it. In order for an experiment to be ethical, it needs unoccupied people to watch the experiment and call out anything wrong with it, which the SPE did not

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford Prison Experiment was set up by psychologist Philip Zimbardo. The goal of the experiment was to study how being a prisoner or prisoner guard affects a person psychologically. The study was scheduled to last two weeks, but it was ended early due to how the prisoners and guards were reacting to their roles. Many men felt as if the experiment felt like real life and were struggling with internal feelings towards themselves.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Human experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Unit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Stanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.

Read More

More about Stateville Prison Experiment Essay

Related Topics

Open Document