Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aztecs and inca civilizations
Aztecs and inca civilizations
Aztecs and inca civilizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aztecs and inca civilizations
Aztecs and inca civilizations
Aztecs and inca civilizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
the 16th century two massive empires ruled over Latin America. The Inca and the Aztec once ruled the area where both empires have many advantages on physical features which lead to the development of the empires. For the better advantage the Inca Empire would excel at the development of their empire better than the Aztec Empire. Living on the Andes Mountains the Inca Empire created Adobe or Stone brick homes from their ingenuity to over come the rainy like weather. With their ingenuity and craftsmanship this civilization created elevated aqueducts that prevents floods hitting their home in which it did work as some still stand.
European societies, like Spain, made technological advancements and started to improve long-distance travel, which resulted in a broadening of influence. Diamond explains these aspects that led to conquest and victory for the Spanish - guns, germs and steel. The difference between Eurasian and societies in the Americas, Africa, and Australia regions is that these places lacked suitable domesticated species, faced many geological barriers, and remained isolated to their lifestyle never significantly expanding nomadically or regionally. This made them more vulnerable to diseases. Diseases was the biggest factor that wiped out the indigenous societies in Inca.
Bruce Haidrey Mrs. Anderson Period 6 CCOT in Latin America 1550-1850 Overtime, Latin America has developed greatly. However to develop, Latin America could not keep everything the same. To be able to grow into a very powerful region that they were hoping to become, many changes were made physically. Although Latin America greatly developed politically, socially, and culturally, ultimately they developed most in their economic aspects of their region.
The Columbian Exchange between the new world and the old world significantly change people’s lives. After 1492, Europeans brought in horses to America which changes the nomadic Native American groups’ living from riding on buffalos to horses. This interchange also change the diet of the rest of the world with foods such as corns (maize), potatoes which are major diet for European nowadays. Besides all the animals from old world to the new world, Spanish also brought in the diseases that Native Americans were not immune of, such as smallpox which led to a large amount of Native Americans’ deaths.
Starting in the years immediately preceding 1500, Latin America became connected with the rest of the world. Some aspects of this land, including the dependence on agriculture to support itself and epidemic diseases—like smallpox—killing scores of natives, remained the same. However, between the years 1500 and 1750, changes, like the rearranging of social hierarchies/ social classes brought on by an influx of European and African peoples, dramatically reshaped the course of Latin American history. Latin America continued to depend on agriculture to support itself between 1500 and 1750. Large-scale agriculture supported urbanization in Latin America.
Mexico and Cuba underwent major revolutions led by rebels who opposed their current presidents. The revolutionaries in both countries were mainly concerned with the industrialization and modernization that was occurring within their countries. The uprisings resulted in the countries shared beliefs against foreign imperialism, against elites having so much control on their counties and push for land reforms. In the long run Mexico faired better after their revolution than Cuba. Cuba still experiences hostile tensions with the U.S. today and still practices rationing.
The time period 1450 CE to 1750 CE, the mid-fifteen century more specifically, was an era of great significance for not only the Spanish but also the Ottoman Empire. Both empires were up-and-coming, rising up, becoming powerful by simply achieving amazing milestones for their empires. During the mid-fifteenth century, the Spanish Empire had just discovered the Americas, on the other hand the Ottomans had just taken Constantinople, city of the Roman/Byzantine Empire. The fifteenth century was just the start for both of these empires to become large and start dominating.
Today I will be sharing and comparing the similarities and differences between the Aztec empire and the Inca empire. Although the tribes came from different locations and don’t have much in common, they do have different things that make them alike, such as the fact that they both have important events that occur around the same time and that they both eat some of the same foods. These two empires are very different as well, but most tribes and empires are. Today I will be comparing the similarities between the Inca and Aztec empire. The three main crops that the Inca grew were ones that contained cocoa beans, beans, and vegetables.
Therefore, Latin America never really escaped the control of Europe or North America and remained reliant on to them through technology and as a result became less
Franciso Pizzaro, a Spanish conquistador, arrived at the capital of the Inca empire with 168 men on November 15, 1532, and within 24 hours of coming into contact with the Incas, 7,000 Inca warriors lay lifeless, and yet not a single Spanish life was shed during the battle. Hernan Cortes accomplished something very similar in the invasion of the Aztec empire. These two conquistadors were able to conquer the Americas with significantly fewer men, killing thousands of Native Americans in Central and South America within hours and unknowingly killing around 25 million Native Americans within a century. Pizzaro, Cortes, and many other conquistadors were able to bring about this through guns, germs, and steel.
Cuba and Mexico share more than just language and existing in what some call Latin America, they are brothers that were raised by the same family, but after coming of age and leaving home they went in very different directions. Cuba and Mexico both experienced the extended struggle to become independent nations and each was forced into a bloody revolution by a different set of circumstances. It is clear that Mexico experienced more change and is to be considered more
The Colombian exchange created a great cultural impact on The Americas which can be seen even today. Wiping out up to ninety percent of Native Americans, the settlers that came to America created a biological imperialism on another scale. The demand from European countries for exportation quickly created a market that settlers could benefit from and Native Americans could not compete with. Deforestation started on a massive scale due to the high availability of lumber, and seas quickly started to be depleted of fish. The introduction of livestock and agriculture created an environmental revolution.
America once colonized South America. Based on past examples Colonization of South America would be wrong because Americans would be taking away South America's freedom and increasing violence in their country Americans should not try to colonize South America because it would be taking away their freedom, like the British did to Africa. Notice what happened when the British tried to take over Africa, “Africans lost control of their land and of their independence”(Lugard, F. 1929). The British came over and took South Americans land.
After colonization, the countries of French Guiana, Suriname, Guyana, and Belize were and are not considered to be part of "Latin America" because the settlers were from France and did not speak Spanish or Portuguese like most of the region. However Haiti is considered to be a Latin American country due to the successful Haitian slave revolt that is seen as the start of freedom in other Latin American countries.
A quote which describes this best is one by Uruguayan journalist Eduardo Galeano “Latin America is the region of open veins. Everything, from the discovery until our times, has always been transmuted into European— or later United States— capital, and as such has accumulated in distant centers of power. Everything: the soil, its fruits and its mineral-rich depths, the people and their capacity to work and to consume, natural resources and human resources” (Galeano,