Abolitionist Strategies David Walker and Phillis Wheatley are two exceptional humans. The ideologies expressed throughout their work had a unique perspective, due to their intimate insight of being apart of the slave system. Though they align on the right to freedom, they do not entirely collude together, on the same abolitionist tone. Wheatley wishes to degrade this institution, through wit and intellect. Walker has a militant approach, when provoking others to act. “How would they like for us to make slaves of, or hold them in cruel slavery, and murder them as they do us.” (David Walker 811). This excerpt displays David Walkers Hostile connotation, when attempting to persuade, his fellow citizens to fight for the cause of abolition. Imbedded in this statement is a touch of his militarized mentality. The thought of revenge, through the eye for an eye policy, would require organized fighting forces. David walker seems to write in a rhetoric designed to enact change that will inevitably lead to conflict. …show more content…
Makes her letter and poems burden a neoclassical tone. She forgoes a non-emotional strategy in the creation of her work. Shining the strongest contrast to Walkers own pieces. He deems a more emotional strategic bases, will be the best catalyst to align others to the abolition movement. Wheatley’s “…desire not for there hurt, but to convince them of the strange absurdity of their conduct….” (Phillis Wheatley 579). She imbedded zero indicators of persuading readers to impose violence, as their way to aid in the fight. The bipolar mentalities make two opposite fronts, fighting in the push for