ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

1118 Words5 Pages

The Federalists created the Constitution we all know today, then called the Federalist Papers, in 1788 to oppose the current Articles of Confederation. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay created The Federalist in New York to publish and introduce the idea of a more centralized government(Federalists, n.d.). Countering the Articles of Confederation and challenging the current government system infuriated the Antifederalists. It infuriated them so much that many of them came together to publish many speeches against adopting the ratification of the Constitution, known as the Anti-Federalist papers. The Anti-Federalist papers were disclosed and private, for everyone involved could get in serious trouble, but Robert Yates, George Clinton, Samuel Bryan, and Richard Henry Lee took the task into their own hands. Federalists would be favorable towards the power that the president and all branches of government have today. Likewise, the Antifederalists would be happy about the Amendments within the Constitution and the way Checks and Balances control the power in the government(Anti-Federalists, n.d.). The executive branch of the United States …show more content…

Publishing the Federalist papers was a very risky and controversial thing to do at the time, and the Articles of confederation would have torn our country apart. The impact that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay made are unexplainable. The opposition that Robert Yates, George Clinton, Samuel Bryan, and Richard Henry Lee is so courageous that we all remember and respect their decision today. Anti-federalists would be ecstatic with how much this country has taken local issues more seriously whilst federalists would be happy about how powerful our central government has gotten(Anti-Federalists, n.d.)(Federalists,

Show More
Related
193 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalist papers were the outcome of the fall of the articles of confederation. John Jay, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were the main contributors to the 85 letters written to newspapers between 1787 and 1788. The purpose of all the letters, known as the Federalist papers was to persuade all of the colonies to ratify the new constitution. The federalist papers talk about many things, but mainly how the new constitution would create a strong central government and would preserve the union. Also, the anti federalists tried to publish anonymous articles that basically went against everything the federalists had to say.

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

On September 17, 1787, The Philadelphia Convention emitted their own new constitution to the states for ratification. Instead, The Federalist profoundly accepted the Constitution for several reasons, which included that this new constitution allowed for higher and further central government, that was formerly undermined under the Articles of Confederation. In the other hand, The Anti-Federalist, did not want a authoritative and dominant central government, but instead, powerful state governments; in response to the new constitution, many of the Anti-Federalists began writing different essays and creating pamphlets as a means of arguing against it. In retaliation to the Anti-Federalists experiment at earning states to not rarify the Constitution, many federalists advanced a group of essays known as the Federalist Papers, which argued for the ratification of the new law system.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Since they were all for the new constitution, they wanted to go ahead and make it. But the Anti-federalists didn’t want this. They were hesitant on this new government. So, that is why the Federalist papers were created. These were a series of 85 essays that tried to convince Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution.

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

Federalists and Anti- Federalists had different view points on how they wanted to run their governments. Federalists wanted a strong central government. They wanted the Constitution to be ratified right away, with no changes. Federalists wanted the powers of state to be given central government. They wanted the government to be divided into three branches.

Read More
161 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalist Papers were a collection of essays in support of the ratification of the Constitution. The writers of the papers tried to stay anonymous, but people soon figured that writers were James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. The authors didn’t want to put their names on their works, because they wanted to keep their identity hidden, so that people would take their argument form an objective point of view rather than a subjective view due to their personalities. The Federalist Papers worked at their main objective to ratify the Constitution. It was important that all states ratified the Constitution, especially Virginia and New York.

Read More
1223 Words | 5 Pages

The Federalist Papers were essays written in 1787 by Alexander Hamilton who collaborated with James Madison and John Jay. The Federalist Papers defended the newly drafted constitution and explained how the constitution was a upgrade from the Articles of confederation. These papers were originally published using the pen name Publius in the Newspaper before the names of the writers were released. These papers were written to the people of New York to sway them in ratifying the Constitution. Federalist Paper number ten explains how the violence and damage that happens to be caused by factions and how the constitution could fix that.

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

Federalists were persons of the U.S citizens of the United States who had believed that the constitution of the U.S was good how it was. Federalists wanted a strong centralized government. “A pure democracy can admit no cure for the

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist Papers were, and still are, very important to American History. These series of essays, mostly written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, were published to persuade Americans to ratify the new constitution. The new constitution would replace the Articles of Confederation, what the American’s had been living under at the time. The constitution highlighted an issue that the articles did not; empowering the central government like never before. Allowing the central government to act in the interest of the United States.

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

During the writing of the Constitution there was a group of people who did not agree with the federalist and they were the anti-federalists. They believed in the exact opposite of what the federalists believed. The federalists believed "that the nation might not survive without the passage of the Constitution"(The Ratification Debate). They argued that the government would only have powers that the Constitution would state. They also argued that the separation of the powers of government would help balance out power and help prevent any tyranny.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

When the Articles of Confederation failed to organize the citizens and the economy of America its citizens decided to advocate for a different form of government, that arose in the creation of the Constitution, the supreme law of the land. As a new form of government was presented the fear that the American Revolution had brought upon the colonies lead to the creation of two different political groups the Federalist and Anti- federalist that stood for those who feared the government and those who believed that the government should be stronger. Based on the Federalist papers I believe that the Anti- federalist had a better argument as they pushed for the protection of individual rights and the limitation of the power of the government. Federalist

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalist papers were made for two specifics reason of events that happened before the revolution that the leaders wanted to prevent in the future by coming up with the idea of editing the Articles of Confederation. this two reason were: American federal organization were practicing of the old British empire as it existed before 1764, and the arguments of the generation from the French and Indian war to the adoption of the federal Constitution, and, more particularly, the discussions in the ten or twelve years before independence, made the way they want to organize the country difficult because the population was used to it they were afraid of a change meant. “The center of this problem was the difficulty of recognizing federalism; and,

Read More
1032 Words | 5 Pages

The Federalist Papers By definition, The Federalist Papers can be referred to as a collection eighty-five essays that appeared in the New York press in 1787-1788 in support of the Constitution; written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay and published under the pseudonym “Publius”. (Give Me Liberty!) Despite the accuracy in this definition, it does not give these papers the acknowledgement they deserve. The Federalist Papers are considered one of the most important sources for interpreting and understanding the original intent of the Constitution. (loc.gov)

Read More
2158 Words | 9 Pages

The Federalist Papers represent one of the most significant contributions to American political thought. Penned by three of the Founding Fathers—John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton—these papers served as a compelling argument in favor of ratifying the United States Constitution, which was drafted during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. The purpose of this collection was to influence public opinion in support of the Constitution's adoption by providing insight into its principles, structure, and benefits. At the heart of the Federalist Papers is the assertion that a strong central government, as outlined in the proposed Constitution, is essential for the stability, prosperity, and security of the fledgling nation.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

In order for America to succeed as a nation both the anti-Federalists and Federalists had to agree about the future of the nation and the Constitution. The Federalists believed that the republican government proposed by the Constitution was likely to be successful and efficacious while the anti-Federalists were not convinced and believed that the power should remain at the hands of the state and local governments. One of the reasons that the Federalists believed that the republican government was likely to be successful and efficacious, as presented in the Constitution, was because the larger government meant more power to control the transatlantic force. The Federalists believed that only a union would be strong enough to secure favorable

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalists papers were essays written in the 1780s by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison to newspapers. They were written to defend the newly created constitution, in which at least nine of the thirteen colonies had vote yes for it to pass. It started with Alexander’s passion for wanting to fix the economic system. He saw that there were issues in the system that could be solved through enabling the federal government to work together and strictly, to solve them. He knew there were problems because the lack of treasury or a set bank.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

Open Document