ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Friedke Vs Skepticism

255 Words2 Pages
Dretske v. Skepticism In The Pragmatic Dimensions to Knowledge, Dretske challenges the skeptical arguments to knowledge. Specifically, that knowledge is an ideal thing that we never truly have, but think we do. Our justifications can not be certain because they could or could not be true. Knowing implies an irrefutable degree of justification that qualifies your beliefs as knowledge. Justification is a qualifier of knowledge, meaning that we need to reach a certain level of justification to have knowledge of something. The skeptic position argues that knowledge is absolute, we can never be absolutely certain, we have no knowledge. Although Dretske and Skeptics agree that knowledge is absolute, Dretske doesn’t believe just because all justifications
Open Document