ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Osama Bin Laden

1162 Words5 Pages

Though both men were family men and stood strongly by their families and principles, Mahatma Gandhi and Osama Bin Laden were polar opposites. Osama Bin Laden and Mahatma Gandhi each had a polar opposite outlook and purpose for their respective lives. Gandhi was for the non-violent society. Meanwhile, Bin Laden insisted for Muslims to unleash violent jihad amongst everyone and anyone who did not believe in the Muslim faith. Even with extreme differences, these two men were both politically driven, religious, and relentless in their missions; one of them being extremely violent and the other, a gentle, shy activist who thought the world would do better without war and violence. Mahatma Gandhi came from a poor family in a town called Porbandar, India where he grew up but did not stay there past his teens years. Gandhi was a family man who …show more content…

Although their intents were different, they both were religiously and politically driven. Unlike Gandhi, Bin Laden is not looking to gain independence from another country, but rather his goal was to emancipate the Arab Muslims from the injustices of America and its allies and do away with the corruptness he felt was going on in parts of the world, which he felt the West was largely responsible for. Most notably, U.S’s involvement of Israel in Palestine. Not only did Osama want to go to war with the West and their allies, but he felt that he should wage jihad even against Muslims who did not practice the religion the way he did. It is because Osama had not one goal set in stone and plenty of enemies that failure doomed around the corner. Gandhi on the other hand, was more focused and for the good hearted. The amount of support Gandhi had was because he was always trying to do the right thing. Gandhi was kind-hearted, always looking for the best interest of the people. Because of this, Gandhi’s agenda proves to outlast any of Bin Laden’s

Show More
Related
535 Words | 3 Pages

Cesar Chavez and Gandhi are both two different people that defended other people. They both wanted to accomplish an important goal that would change the future for other people to have their rights. Cesar wanted to get paid more money for what they were working for by protesting to the owner of the company and not eat the food the company distributed. Gandhi wanted India to be free once again and not ruled by Great Britain so he gather people to go protest to the government he wanted to accomplish a goal that would help the people of India. He was remembered to a model to the people for helping to free India.

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi was a civil rights leader. Gandhi is credited with freeing India from British rule. Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869. He studied in London to become a lawyer and went to South Africa to practice law. While he was in South Africa he began to congregate with the Indian population and held silent strikes against social injustices (Biography.com).

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi Manav Patel Mahatma Karamchand Gandhi was a humanitarian who used peaceful topics to fight for the freedom of India. He walked 250 miles from his Ashram to Dandi, a coast off of Eastern India. He then proceeded to pick up a lump of salt, thereby defying British Law. This story leads us to ask the question, why did Gandhi’s nonviolent movement work? Basically, he could convince the people to join him instead of killing off nonbelievers.

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know Martin Luther King Junior got his idea to write the “Letter From Birmingham Jail” from Gandhi? He did get the idea from Gandhi. Not only did they use letters to fight for justice in their country they also had many similar things in their letters. Gandhi and Martin Luther King Junior both show examples of appeals that effectively support their positions using ties to logical, ethical and emotional appeals. Both Gandhi and King Jr. used logical appeals to show their opponents what they were doing was bad and wrong.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Some similarities between them were persuasive leaders, had a crucial effect on society, and they both achieved more than expected to. Some differences between Kamehameha and Gandhi is how Kamehameha was a more fighting leader while Gandhi was deeply committed to achieving his goal in a non-violent way, another difference is their effect on society, and where and who they affected because of their actions. Both of them changed and kept things the same after they became a leader, some of the things Kamehameha kept the same was the Ahu’pua’a and he kept the kapu system, some things he changed was putting in the Law of the Splintered Paddle to the kapu system and controlling the royale monopoly. Some things Gandhi kept the same was sticking to non-violence actions and he kept some of the customs, some things he changed was helping India be independent and kept their

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

Gandhi wanted an equal society where no race or religion was superior to another. Despite the harsh treatment Gandhi faced on the train, he was still motivated to strive for equality of all. Gandhi expressed this by adopting some ethics from the Bible, such as loving the people near you just as much as you love yourself. Also, Gandhi lived his life in-line with the principle, ‘Battle

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

Gandhi once said, “An eye-for-an-eye makes the whole world blind.” What he meant is that fighting violence with violence helped no one. During his lifetime, Gandhi fought against oppressive British rule in India, and his journey was known throughout the world. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela both shared Gandhi’s thirst for freedom, basing their respective movements for peace on Gandhi’s. All three men fought peacefully for equality, whether it was for India’s freedom from the British empire, emancipation from apartheid laws that prohibited black Africans from being truly free, or liberation from Jim Crow laws to keep black Americans inferior to whites.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

The comparison of Mahatma Gandhi and Antigone may seem like an unlikely one, given that they were from different cultures and time periods. However, upon closer examination, these two figures share several similarities. Firstly, both Gandhi and Antigone prioritized moral law over civil law. Secondly, they both engaged in acts of civil disobedience to combat oppressive regimes. Thirdly, their actions inspired others to follow their lead.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

Both Civil Disobedience and the Gandhi article are alike based on the fact they both discuss civil disobedience, attending prison, and standing for one’s beliefs. Civil disobedience can be seen as a good thing and a bad thing depending on to what extent one is breaking the laws. Some people may break the law because they feel that it is unfair to them but others break the for the simple fact of doing what they want in order for it to benefit themselves. Laws are meant for the majority which means even if they are not pertaining to certain citizens. Thoreau targeted laws that pertained to him, Gandhi went on strike for the better of his country and people.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Civil Disobedience by Thoreau is the refusal to obey government demands or commands and nonresistance to consequent arrest and punishment this had an extreme effect on Martin Luther King Jr and Mahatma Gandhi. They were fighting for different beliefs. However they both had the same believes about civil disobedience and they both end in the same place, jail. In the first place Gandhi believed that the only way to confronted injustice was with non-violent methods.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Malcolm X and Nelson Mandela were two influential figures that have both made a cultural impact on black history. The fact that their lives run parallel further stresses the significance of racial equality. However, they each influenced the world around them with their respective ideologies and beliefs. Their opinions and experiences differed in terms of equality and character throughout their movements. Malcolm X and Nelson Mandela both tried to achieve similar goals of equality but on different paths.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

Due to the race inequality along with the economic regulations among the Indian people, Gandhi’s ambition from the beginning of simply just wanting equality between the Indian and British transition to wanting India to become Independence. He wanted to give the Indian citizen a voice in the government and a chance to define their own nation. The Indian people lose their political power in terms of how the British authorities were exercising their power over them, implementing policies according to their own rules and administrating over the Indian’s resources. Gandhi throughout the film had the desire to help gain back India’s political power and it revolves around his method of passive resistance and self-sacrifice. He belief in “an eye for an eye only makes people blind” is what helped him achieve freedom for India without any violence involve.

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

Compare and Contrast Between the 2 articles on similar themes, there are 4 reasons. (1) Gandhi and Thoreau both would not agree in certain things like laws. (2) Gandhi and Thoreau discussed civil disobedience. (3) Gandhi and Thoreau were influenced in writing their expressions, and how both wrote their expressions against the government and laws. Gandhi and Thoreau have different perspectives of the laws, and what people should follow.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Gandhi always made sure that they kept the movement nonviolent. They had meetings on how they were going to approach the movement, they were organized and had a plan. Gandhi got many of his ideas and principles through reading the bible, reading the Bhagavad Gita, and writers like Henry David Thoreau. Gandhi and the Indian people created some dilemmas to throw the British government off balance. Gandhi told the Indian people to boycott all British goods and only buy Indian goods.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

Malcolm X and Mahatma Gandhi were two incredible men, both fighting for independence among their people. These distinctly different men were among the strongest fighters who set foot in authority. Malcolm X, an African-American leader spread religion to combat the weakening of his fellow African-Americans, as well as to expand the supporters of Muslim beliefs. Mahatma Gandhi, a leader in India’s independence movement from the British, weakened British rule through civil resistance. While Malcolm X and Gandhi both fought for their people’s freedom, their religion, beliefs, and methods for achieving independence differ in certain aspects but also have similar elements.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Osama Bin Laden

Related Topics

Open Document