Additionally, there is another example that proves this claim which can be seen through the Vietnam War: This is known as the Gulf of Tonkin. The year 1964 would mark the formal involvement of the U.S. entering the Vietnam War issued by President Lyndon B. Johnson. Having similar ideas like those of the CIA interventions, the U.S. also had intentions of stopping communism from happening in Vietnam. All starting because of two separate attacks on two US Navy destroyers: “U.S.S Maddox and U.S.S Turner Joy” (Gulf of Tonkin Resolution), the Gulf of Tonkin shows how similar to Operation Cyclone and Pearl Harbor it really was to the idea of increasing military supplies based on both threats of communism and threats of attacks, as well as gaining the support of Americans by justifying these threats as “major problems that must be taken care of all in the name of “protecting and serving our nation”. …show more content…
officials ended up lying to the public” (Zinn 477). While this case alone sufficiently proves that the U.S. government uses any threat that it comes across with and labels them as “massive threats” in order to get a substantial amount of people to agree with the increase of military supplies, another report in Zinn's book shows why even false threats are important and still valuable to the gain in increasing military supplies (Zinn, 477). Even though the Tonkin affair was proved and cased as a wrongful action, that did not stop them from sending troops into Vietnam and declaring war on the Vietnamese having over 200,000 American soldiers sent to South Vietnam and 200,000 the year