James Madison, or better known as the “Father of the Constitution” helped put our nation to where we are today. Back in the late 1700’s Madison composed documents known as the Federalist Papers and in these documents, specifically Federalist paper 10 he describes to us and tries to define his thoughts on a “Republic” and a “Democracy”. Throughout this essay, a fair comparison will be given between both forms of government. Firstly, he states “a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person.” (Madison, Fed. #10,1788) 1. In this type of government, a community could have a meeting and completely enact or defeat legislation through the votes in an election. Madison refers to a republic as “a republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place.” So, in simpler terms we could say that a democracy makes decisions together as a community on a smaller scale through a vote in comparison to a Republic where “representation” would be provided and citizens choose leaders to make decisions for them (Jeffersonian Perspective)3. …show more content…
One problem Madison addressed was factions. A faction is a small group within a larger one conflicting or disagreeing. When having just the people vote and discuss solemnly, they could make more problems based on what they wanted individually. So in turn, this was the danger of a direct democracy. The only way to fix this was to not have the people individually express yet on a larger scale be grouped by their thoughts as a whole. (What was James Madison