ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King From Birmingham Jail

564 Words3 Pages

While incarcerated in Birmingham jail, Martin Luther King Jr. proposes that there are two types of law. He states that a law can either be just or unjust, and that morals and religious ideals are what determine a just or unjust law. This seems to be a very simple concept to grasp, but Martin Luther King Jr. delves deeper and provides examples.He states that laws concerned with the betterment of human personality are considered just, while anything degrading human personality would be an unjust law. He goes on the say that segregation is a clear example of an unjust law the destroys human personality,and even states that segregation is a sinful act of separation. King tells us that unjust laws are laws that are created by the majority in order to rule the minority, that being denied basic rights are unjust laws, and that some laws can be just or unjust depending on the circumstances. …show more content…

The law that held him there states that to parade in town, an individual or group must have a permit. King did not have this permit, however King believes that the law was used by the government to maintain segregation. This misuse of power was brought up by King when he also referred to Ancient Roman laws against the christians, and Adolf Hitler’s laws allowing him to rise in power. He does this to show us as readers/listeners that laws are not perfect,an can be manipulated, and that it is okay to stand up to any unjust law in a peaceful way while also knowing that there will be consequences to those actions. Consequences that Martin Luther King Jr. was ready and willing to

Open Document