ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

926 Words4 Pages

There are two distinct methods that were practiced during the Civil Rights Movement which included violent protesting and peaceful protesting. Some of the most known African-Americans during this time period who clashed in their beliefs of which method was more effective are Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Martin Luther King Jr approached the Civil Rights Movement with the idea of sparking non-violent protests across the nation. On the contrary, Malcolm X believed that violence was needed in order to prove their point. Overall, after seeing the effects of both of these people’s methods, Martin Luther King Jr.’s approach to ending segregation was more effective than Malcolm X’s approach. First, it is crucial to understand both Martin Luther …show more content…

He was suspicious of whites, willing to use “by any means necessary” to achieve equality. It started with his upbringing in an underprivileged family and he had barely any education. He grew up in a hostile environment and was exposed to violence from the start. He was involved in crimes from as early as eighth grade. He was charged with running numbers and breaking and entering. He had plans to take the cause to the United Nations, charging the U.S. government with failure to protect its black citizens from racist white terrorism. As he states regarding violence, “Since self-preservation is the first law of nature, we assert the African-American’s right of self-defense. The Constitution of the USA clearly affirms the right of every American citizen to bear arms. And as Americans we will not give up a single right guaranteed under the Constitution” (Ladenburg, 2007, pg. 32). This proves that he was supportive of African-Americans owning and also using guns in order to stand up for themselves. However, his methods of rather violent protests were often unsuccessful. For example, when African-Americans used violent measures in an attempt to prove their point, it only sparked more violence on behalf of the white people. Riots such as the Harlem, Philadelphia, and Rochester riots are examples of when violence went too far and multiple lives were lost (Trethowen, para.

Show More
Related
731 Words | 3 Pages

In the beginning, he believed in the Populist Party and wanted to work with poor blacks. Later in his life, when the Populist Party failed, he went into yellow journalism. He then triggered the Lynching of Leo Frank by helping restart the second KKK. Even before restarting the KKK he inspired the Atlanta Race Riot and joined the progressive movement. As a Progressive, he wanted to take all blacks out public society.

Read More
354 Words | 2 Pages

In the essay named “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Junior, He uses many great approaches to many different problems faced in his time. The fact that he wants to use a nonviolent approach to solve these problems is not only an admirable thing to do but also the right thing to do. Instead of using violent means to make his points, he instead uses things such as sit-ins, marches, boycotts, and many other ways to peacefully make his point. This in turn breaks the cycle of hatred between the races at that time. If he had used other means, then the problem would have only escalated and gotten worse.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

This helps make his decisions logical. In addition, he addresses his nonviolent strategy as a thought of God “though influence of the Negro church” which is a trustworthy source contrary

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

In the 1960, in america during the civil war movement two leaders emerged wanting freedom but both had different views on how to achieve that goal. The first man was Martin Luther King Jr. and believed in more peaceful tactics while the other man Malcolm X believed more of a violent approach and shared his very well observed hate towards mostly the white man. I will be showing you why Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy is the most accurate way to accomplish the goal of freedom thru the works of non violent responses, boycotts, and demanding equality. The first reason was his approach to the white men when they try to harm African Americans or break them down.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

He received calls from racist people saying that one day He would raped. also they hanged a half white and half black dummy with a portrait of him at the center of the square of his city in Texas (156). I admire the risk that he took to convey nationally and internationally the reality of the treatment that black people were receiving. It is one of my favorite parts of the

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

In the book “No Crystal Stair”, many people were motivated by Malcolm X’s philosophy “by any means necessary” more than Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy. The way I see the Civil Rights Movement, society moves forward farther using violence. A nonviolent approach was not a good as a violent approach because violence was the key to the Civil Rights Movement. Also, Lewis Michaux, the main character, supports Malcolm X’s philosophy a little more than Martin Luther King Jr’s. Reasons being that it made the black community more brave, made them grow and fight for what they believe in, and nonviolence lead to death.

Read More
1606 Words | 7 Pages

Ocano.1 Brian Ocano Mr. Lee English 2 15 February 2017 Autobiography of Malcolm X & Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. King and Malcolm x have impacted the world greatly, but do you think that Dr. King has impacted the world more than Malcolm x how and why do you think so? Dr. King was born on January 15, 1929, in Atlanta Georgia to Alberta Williams King and Martin Luther King Sr. Kings father was an American Pastor/rev and Missionary and he was also an early figure in the civil rights movement. He then took the place of his father in-law, as a Pastor of the Ebeneezer Baptist church.

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

His language cannot be described as harsh and condemning of those who threaten violence. Rather, it is an overall gesture for peace. He uses language such as, “Men who happened to be born negro.” This creates a coincidental effect--as if the men being black is of no real consequence to the people. He downplays the effect of race in the world through his speech to distract white Americans from the fact that the issue is essentially about

Read More
1974 Words | 8 Pages

However, the action should be taken without nonviolence and with peaceful protest. Dr. King’s nonviolent tactic was a success as it bridged the gap between the colored and white people. Malcolm X was renown for his act of self defense throughout the Civil Rights Movement. His main goal was to prove how whites did not treat black people as human beings. However, through Malcolm X’s several tactics, Martin Luther King’s movement was made more impactful and successful.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are two profound African American figures in history. They both fought for equality and to better humanity. But, the tactics they used were very different. Their different views may have been rooted from the where they were raised. Martin Luther King Jr. grew up in a middle class family and received a very solid education.

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

Even in self-defense, violence was rarely, if ever, used during protest lead by King. Malcolm X, on the other hand, notes that his approach to civil rights is very different from “…Dr. Martin Luther Kings’s non-violent marching…” Though their ideas sometimes aligned, “Malcolm’s voice established a vigorous alternative to the oracular preachings…” of King.

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Focusing specifically on the opposition of racial segregation, The Civil Rights movement symbolized the need for change across America. Between the years of 1950 and 1960, events such as; the March on Washington, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, speeches, protests, and sit-ins, directly defined such opposition. Due to such events, two outstanding leaders of their time, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X emerged into the public eye and began to impact the Civil Rights movement. At a turning point of the century, the two men took charge and became icons across the world while resonating significantly with African American minorities. With such in mind, the two men had extreme differences in their morals, ideals, and religions; however, both deemed

Read More
1539 Words | 7 Pages

He saw groups of abolitionists go against people that were pro-slavery and it ended in a violent battle that was started by the pro-slavery side. This made him cautious but he didn’t yet want to start being violent unless someone else went after him. This quickly changed and he knew that the only way to prove his point was to engage in violent acts like the others. One of these acts involved John Brown going to Rochester and meeting with a man named “Frederick Douglass. His purpose was to enlist the famous black abolitionist's support for his plan to invade the slave South and wage a guerilla war from a base in the Appalachian Mountains” (Earle, John Brown's Raid on Harpers Ferry; May 8, 1858).

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

The people who lived during the Civil Rights Movement used both violent and non- violent protests , marches and speeches. No matter how anyone look at the past, it carved a better future for many African Americans.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

Related Topics

Open Document