Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr were civil right leaders who were well respected for their ideas. However, they had differences that would impact the success of their initiatives. Malcolm X had superior solutions for a strong centralized black community and a stable black economy, while King’s ideas made more sense in terms of his nonviolent philosophy and push for an integrated education system. Whiles Martin Luther King, Jr’s idea about blacks and whites together would work in a perfect society,America was far from a perfect society in the 1960s.
Martin Luther King vs. Malcolm X Philosophical Differences In the 1900s, as racism had become more and more apparent, leaders started to rise up in attempt to change society’s opinion which led to and increasing amount of people becoming involved in the Civil Rights Movement. Many had conflicting ideas about how to eliminate racism, and as people became bolder with their beliefs, different strategies started to emerge. Two ideas among many were the main tactics used to convince people that segregation should be stopped. These two ideas were sprung from the minds of two different men, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. When equal rights were not established, protests and marches were the major uses of displaying indignation towards racism.
In the Civil Rights Moment there were two men named Martin Luther King and Malcom X. They both aimed for racism to be gone but differently. Martin Luther King was a black minister who aimed for freedom and no racism towards blacks with no violence. Malcom X was also a black minister who tried to end racism but in a violent way for human rights. The Supreme Court cut down on discrimination such as jobs and racial harassment during the Civil Rights Movement in the late 1800s.
Pyae Zone Ms. DePolo EN101-01 10/16/2016 Two Different Prophets Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very prominent African American leaders in history. The two leaders fought for what they believed was right in many different ways. Even though there are beliefs that the two would never agree on many issues, they seemed to have pursued the same goals: fighting to end exploitation, racism, and discrimination against blacks. Both leaders seemed to have been influenced by their parents, particularly by their fathers as well as their attitude towards white people.
1960s was a time of change. Martin Luther King Jjr. and Malcolm X are two of the most influential people during that time, both fighting for Civil Rights in the 1960s.. Though they were fighting for the same goal of equal rights for all, the two men did it in different ways, focusing on different aspects of the movement. MLK, who had come from a well off home in Atlanta, Georgia, fought for Civil Rights focussing on the political side of the movement, with peaceful protests.
While many people are familiar with the civil rights movement and the work of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X some are not aware of the similarities and differences between the two. I have chosen to take the time to put these two men side by side for a comparison. Both of these men where activist for the African America community. They had different lifestyles therefore taking different approaches on how they would fight for rights. Martin Luther King Jr. was a nonviolent man who believed in equality for all.
The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. earned him to be recognized as the face of the Civil Rights movement. Therefore, Malcolm X should have changed his leadership style to work with Martin Luther King Jr. because his way of fighting for civil rights was strategically thought out and ultimately effective. Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist who became the most visible spokesperson and leader in the Civil Rights movement. He was born in Atlanta, Georgia to Reverend Martin Luther King Sr. and Alberta Williams King. Martin Luther King Jr. came from a line of pastors in his family, and from the beginning, he was on his way to becoming one himself (Martin Luther King Jr.).
Martin Luther King Jr.’s civil rights philosophy made more sense for the 1960’s. During the 1960’s the civil rights movement proved prominent. Through the 60’s thousands of leaders rose, but only two emerged above the rest. Those two were known as Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Both Martin and Malcom were very intelligent men but the two had totally different views on how blacks should go about gaining civil rights. Both proved to be pioneers of the movement, however it was Martins philosophy that reigned supreme.
Malcolm wanted the violent way and wanted to fight and start wars if it was “necessary” to do, while Martin Luther King took the non-violent route and did everything he could to try and stop that. He thought that nonviolence is the refusal to cooperate with evil, and there is nothing effective with the evil that they had in their communities during this time. (Doc F) Martin believed that blacks should not work with evil, he knew that the blacks would go through pain that the whites caused them (Doc J) Also, King preached for equality and desegregation and wanted white people and African Americans to work together. (Doc
Martin Luther King Jr (MLK). and Malcolm X definitely had their differences in many ways. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both played very big roles in the Civil Rights Movement whether it was their speeches or the Groups they led they had made an impact. MLK had a peaceful approach to gaining equal rights while Malcolm X had “by any means necessary” approach to equal rights. If you ask most people the most memorable thing about MLK is his speech starting with the words “I have a dream”.
When it came to civil rights, finding the right person to lead an entire population into freedom was a pretty important problem. The two most important leaders in the Civil Rights Movement were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, and they were respected by a large portion of the black community in America. Although, when it came the troubling issues of segregation, both of schools and in everyday activities, and the violent approach to fight racism v.s. the non violent approach, Martin Luther King Jr. was a better person to lead black americans. The first reason why black americans needed Martin Luther King Jr. over Malcolm X was MLK’s view on segregation.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had been very important leaders to the Civil Rights movement. Their differing philosophies had made them unique, and brough differing perspectives to the 1960s. In the 1960s, society had been cruel in their treatment of African-Americans. Segregation was still in place, and hate and violence to African Americans had been at a high. The Civil Rights movement had been a big step for African-americans as they fighted for equal rights and the end of segregation.
Today we still remember two of the most iconic, yet opposing, figures of this movement, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. King Jr. followed in the footsteps of Gandhi by being a pacifist and all about peaceful protest no matter what. Malcom X was a radical who favored violence, when necessary. They both shared a goal but chose to express how to achieve those
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were both important and impactful leaders during the Civil Rights Movement who made a change for black people in the nation today. Due to the efforts of both leaders, the nation today consists free of
Christina Baker Kline graduated from several universities including Cambridge, University of Virginia, and Yale. Mrs. Kline was a Henery Hoyns Fellow in fiction Writing at the University of Virginia. Along with the #1 New York Times bestselling novel "Orphan Train", Christina has also written "Bird in Hand", Desire Lines , Sweet Water and The Way Life Should Be. In addition to her many accomplishments Mrs. Kline is also a recipient of several Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation Fellowships and Writer-in-Residence Fellowships. Kline wrote the Orphan Train because she wanted to bring the world to awareness of the hardships that abandoned children underwent and impacts they made on their lives.
