The concept of free will versus a God who knows everything has been a topic of philosophical debate for centuries. Some people believe that free will and omniscience are incompatible, while others argue that the two can coexist (Clarke, 2003). In this paper, I will examine the ramifications of these two concepts and their implications for the existence of God, moral responsibility, and the meaning of life.
One of the central arguments against the coexistence of free will and omniscience is that if God knows everything, including all of our choices and actions, then our choices are determined and not truly free (Craig, 2008). This idea is rooted in the principle of determinism, which states that every event, including human choices, is determined
…show more content…
If our choices are predetermined, then we cannot be held responsible for our actions, as we have no control over them. This argument has led many to conclude that if God is omniscient, then free will is an illusion, and moral responsibility is untenable.
However, proponents of the compatibility of free will and omniscience argue that God's knowledge of the future does not necessarily determine it. Instead, they believe that God's knowledge of the future is compatible with our ability to make free choices. According to this view, God knows what we will do in the future because he knows all possible outcomes, but He does not cause us to make a particular choice. Our choices are still freely made, and we are still responsible for them (Craig, 2008).
Another argument against the coexistence of free will and omniscience is that if God knows everything, then the future is fixed, and there is no real possibility for change or growth. This view holds that if God already knows what we will do, then our lives have no real purpose or meaning, as everything is