Some historians believe the Ottoman Empire and Japan were relatively different from c. 1750 to 1900 due to the differing political structures, including the stability of each country’s government and means of operation in response to enlightenment philosophy and industrialization. However, due to both countries’ thriving economic structures because of similar reform changes and social resistance against conforming to modernization ideals, their development from c. 1750 to 1900, during which industrialization faced both countries, is drawn to be very similar to each other.
To begin with, the adoption of western ideals and enlightenment principles widened the gap between the Ottomans and the Japanese. Not only did the Ottoman Empire suffer massive corruption in the 1800s, prompting its rapid decline, but it also experienced civil unrest across the country as a result of ethnic nationalism, resulting in a weak central government. The Ottoman Empire's overexpansion and failure to modernize by adopting new western ideals slowed the spread of industrialization. On the contrary, the Japanese grew up under a strong central government and pursued to replicate the West by seeking new innovations and ideas in order to
…show more content…
Muhammad Ali shaped Egypt's military based on a European model in one part of the Ottoman Empire, while the Japanese reconstructed their military and established a constitutional monarchy based on the Prussian model. Both countries advocated for and created new schools, expanded educational opportunities, and expanded infrastructure such as roads and railroads. Additionally, both the Ottoman Empire and Japan’s reforms were financed through high taxation, which eventually led to peasants giving up their land to the state, allowing the governments to collect