ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

493 Words2 Pages

The Constitution changed the face of the United States government. However, the United States government was not always run by the Constitution. The Articles of Confederation came before it, but ultimately was decided to be unfit for the needs of the republic due to the lack of power to the central government and the weak bond it formed for the Union. The Constitution transformed the federal system of the United States into the balanced system we use today.

The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were very different documents, especially under the topic of state sovereignty. The Articles of Confederation gave the states much more power. The Articles of Confederation gave states the power to determine how delegates were to be elected, levy and collect taxes, as well as control their individual commerce. Under the Constitution the state governments were striped of these powers. The federal government decides delegates, taxes, and commerce. The Constitution expanded the powers of the federal government. …show more content…

The states could not make trades without the consent of the federal government. Mandates are another way the federal government enlarged its power. Mandates gave the federal government the authority to carry out policies. The national government now had the right to establish policies that the states had to adhere to. With all this new power, the states felt that they needed to find a balance so they established block grants and challenged the national government in the Supreme

Show More
Related
307 Words | 2 Pages

Why did the Framers of the United States ultimately decide to give more power to the Federal Government rather than the state governments? There were many problems and weaknesses with the Articles of Confederation. Some of the weaknesses was that congress did not have the power to tax, couldn’t regulate trade between the states or foreign countries. They had no National court system, the articles could not be amended without the commitment of all 13 colonies. Despite all the problems and weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation there were some good things about it or “strengths”, like it created the first official government of the United States, and the state had no authority to tax or regulate state-to-state trade.

Read More
1738 Words | 7 Pages

However, the Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states and the U.S. Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation as a “guide” on what the government can do, and what the government cannot do. The U.S. Constitution split the power of government, using separation of powers, into three branches of

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution addressed the problems of the Articles of Confederation by giving them the power to regulate trade, collect taxes, created an executive branch, and created a judicial branch. With the new Constitution the power to regulate trade between the states and other countries. Taxes were able to be made and collected by the government. The new executive branch guaranteed a strong central government and a President to lead. The new judicial branch was in charge of trails and upholding the new Constitution to make sure that it was followed.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

The articles of confederation built the structure for what the United States calls the Government today. Before the constitution the Articles of Confederation played an extremely important factor in creating a unified country. The articles of conferation is an agreement between the 13 states it acted as a "firm league of friendship" for the states by providing an alliance. The Articles of Confederation proved the United States had a limited central government. This then led the founding fathers to agree that a new stronger constitution was necessary thus they ratified the constitution and addressed the need for a stronger central government.

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution are massive with there being little in common between the two besides the fact that there were both forms of government for the former British colonies. However, that is where the similarities end. The differences start with the branches of government. There was no true executive branch and even if there was there no way for the government to enforce the law.

Read More
348 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution vary more than they take after one another, when one takes a gander at the specific details. The executive, judicial, and legislative branches differ between the two documents. The Articles of Confederation has no acquisitions that were made for an executive branch to authorize the laws or for a national court framework to decipher them. However, in the executive branch of the Constitution, the President is in charge of the execution and authorization of the laws made by Congress.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The new government, the Constitution, is now able to enforces taxes, which allowed money to come in and the government was able to pay off their debt. One other weakness of the articles was that it gave all power to only one house of representative from each state, the constitution try to solve this matter that creating three separate branches of power, the Legislative branch, Executive branch, and the Judiciary branch, allowing the power to be more divided. Representation was another problem in under the Articles of Confederation because a big state like Massachusetts and a small state like New Jersey both have the same amount of representatives, the Constitution made a compromise by forming two house in Congress the Senate, where each state get equal representation, and the House of Representatives, where each state is represented by the population of the state. The Constitution also fixed the problem of passing a law; under the Articles of Confederation, laws can only be passed if 9 out of 13 representatives agrees on the law because of this not much laws were passed, now under the Constitution only 51 percent of the votes to pass the law. From this readers can infer that the Constitution fixed many of the defects in the Articles

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

After the Articles of Confederation failed because they failed to give enough power to the national government and congress, our founding father’s needed to reflect on its flaws for a new system to be set in place. Their new creation, our Constitution, was then set into place, and was created from a basis of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation directly influence the Constitution by its failure by changing some of the responsibilities of the federal and state governments. The Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states, and the Constitution changed that.

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

Federalism is one of the main topics in both the Constitution and the articles of Confederation. In the Articles of Confederation they decided that the states would have more power than the federal government. In the articles it mentions that, “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right…” Which means that the states will be more superior and have more impact on the people than the federal government. While for the Constitution it is not only the states and the federal government that has power but it’s the people that have some too.

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

On March 1, 1781 The Articles of Confederation were adopted at the Capital of York, Pennsylvania (“Article of Confederation Adopted”). These articles led up to a big part of history. They led up to the Constitution to become a part of our state in government. The committee of 13 men was the ones who had decided to adopt all of the articles.

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

The transformation of the American government directly impacted the structure of society causing debate over the contents of the fundamental principles of the United States Constitution. Articles of Confederation vs The Constitution of 1787 The Articles of Confederation was drafted by the

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

The United States confronted many problems once they gained their independence from Great Britain. One of the biggest problems was their form of government at that time, which was stated in the Articles of Confederation. This presented many problem to the states, as stated in a document about the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, some of the problems of the Articles of Confederation were the poor international trade, poor foreign relations, weak economy, and Shay’s Rebellion. The people, specifically the Federalists, wanted a new government because of the weakness of the government at that moment. According to many history books, the government also faced financial problems and tried to resolve them by taxing the states, because

Read More
314 Words | 2 Pages

The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution are their system of governance. First, the Articles was established as a unicameral legislature consists of one house Congress, and each state only has one vote regardless of its size. This create a major dispute between the large and small states. Small states wanted each state to have equal representation, and large states wanted representation based on population. To settle the dispute, the Constitution establishes a bicameral legislature, a two-house Congress made up of the Senate, an upper house, and the House of Representatives, a lower house.

Read More
1162 Words | 5 Pages

Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress was given authority to declare war, make peace, make treaties and alliances, to coin or borrow money, and to regulate trade with the Native Americans (Ginsberg 35). Moreover, the central government had no power to levy taxes or regulate commerce among the states with the Articles of Confederation (Ginsberg 35). Not to mention, States also retained governmental powers under the Articles of Confederation (Ginsburg 36). In which, States conserved their dominance under Article of Confederation, as Article II states, “each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled ” (Ginsberg 36). Under this well-established sovereignty, States, for the most part, had the capability to install their own militia, industries, general welfare, money, and

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States were both used as a means for forming a functioning government. However, after a few years the new citizens realized that the Articles of Confederation was not government responsibility for the country and that any changes that needed to be made would have to have an agreement amongst all the states. I will describe four the of the changes between the Articles of Confederation and the current Constitution and why those changes were better institutional designs. First, one the major points in the Articles of Confederation was that the federal government could not collect taxes and it was up to the states to collect said taxes based on the relative value of the land in

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document