After reading the comparison of the U.S. Constitution and the Articles of Confederation it seems that the two documents were trying to endorse freedom to me. When comparing the Articles and the Constitution people realize that it was full of drawbacks, then after of while they had answers for all the drawbacks they had. The Articles of Confederation was blame for the actual evidences that the powers are in the hands of the state government and left no major powers for the national government. The Constitution made the provision for executive and judicial branches of the government; to some degree in the Articles of Confederation something didn’t go smooth. The federal government wants for the states authorization to raise an army as per the …show more content…
Constitution gave the federal government the accurate control trade and commerce at the international levels as well as the interstate level. The Articles of Confederation was adopted in 1781 and the conscripting of the U.S. Constitution in 1787 this was one of the flaw, rebellion, and disorder period. Under the Articles of Confederation there was no provisions made for them to enforce laws or interpret them. The Articles of Confederation was lastly ratified in March 1787 by the thirteen states. The Articles of Confederation provided the Congress with authorizing to declare war, create peace, coin money, assign officers for army, control the post office, and convert agreements with Indian clans. Another states added some of the similar provisions and the 10th amendments into the U.S. Constitution in 1791. “The Articles of Confederation asked each state to “enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare,” but it was different from the Constitution in a few significant ways” (The Articles of Confederation: The Constitution Before the Constitution,