ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Us Constitution

591 Words3 Pages

Our national government has not always dad this much influence over matters concerning this country. Under the Articles of Confederation, power for the national government was vastly limited compared to the current central government today. The people who wrote the Articles where worried about a strong central government that would oppress them like the King did. In turn they came up with the Articles of Confederation which gave greater power to the states instead of the national government. Under the Us Constitution the central government know has more power than it did under the Articles of Confederation to stabilize the United States.
When the writers came up with the rules for a new government they wanted democracy to be a part of it. A republic was wanted by the colonists after the King imposed taxes and limited the settlement for people in North America. The US Constitution and the Articles of Confederation let the people have a say on how they could govern themselves instead of a monarch. Both documents limited the power that the central government had on the states and its people. At one point the Articles where the law of the land like the US Constitution is today.
However, unlike the constitution, the Articles could not give the …show more content…

The national and state government both have power which the people can appoint to represent them. It imposes laws to keep corruption and illegal behavior from those that can hurt citizens. Under the constitution we have checks and balances. It distributes power onto the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative so no one is more powerful than the other. Our government has created laws to keep peace and order within its borders. It has given equality to woman, people of color, and all those that are not protestant white. We have freedom because we have options to pick our next president or governor of our

Show More
Related
278 Words | 2 Pages

Back when the united states of america were free from England, they needed a government the founding fathers were scared of making a government with too much power so they wrote the Articles of confederation with some flaws . The “ Articles “ were too weak and created many problems which led to a way stronger government. Two weaknesses of the Articles of confederation are that the states had way too much power. Another problem from the Article of confederation is that 9/13 must approve a law also another one is that each state has it's own currency. And two important decision were the Checks and Balances and the Great compromise.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

The structure and powers of the federal government changed under the Constitution as compared to the Articles of Confederation. Many people, known as the anti-Federalists, opposed these changes while on the contrary, many people, known as the Federalists, supported them. The framework and function of the federal government changed drastically under the Constitution. The federal government was much stronger under the Constitution because it was given the power to run the states under more unified control.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution, unlike the Articles of Confederation, was made into a new system by popular vote. Those who supported the Constitution called themselves Federalists. They followed classical notions of republicanism. They supported a central government system saying, that a carefully constructed government would get rid of any chance of possible tyranny. A republic could be large if the government's design prevented one group from having too much control.

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

When the colonists were still with Great Britain, King George III misused his power. As a result, colonists wrote the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, to the king, to state their separation from Great Britain, to form a new country, the United States of America. After creating a new country, Americans wrote the Articles of Confederation in the year 1777, which they purposely weakened central government, so the abuse of power, wouldn’t exist. This meant the states had all the power. Although this structure of government seemed great, the creators of the Articles quickly realized that with no central government, states weren’t united because they were busy on increasing the growth of only their state.

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

But on the other hand, the national government does not do everything that needs to be done, states can still do many things, do them differently from other states, and the national government cannot interfere. Federalism was put into the constitution because the Articles allowed the Continental Congress the power to sign treaties and declare war, but failed to

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Congress scared of creating a tyrannical government, especially after they had just fought so hard against one, created the Articles of Confederation. While not meant to be permanent more just to satisfy the citizens it still did not last as long as intended. The Articles of Confederation were a major stepping stone on the road to creating a country that will last for centuries. The Articles of Confederation were chosen as Congress felt Parliament had too much power and as a result they severely limited the powers of the national gov’t.

Read More
1417 Words | 6 Pages

On the other hand, the US Constitution introduced the structure wherein every illustrative or congressperson was given one vote. The Constitution furthermore masterminded setting up the official organization branch, something which Articles of Confederation didn't energize. Thusly, the official, that is, the President was picked by an appointive school. Right, when the Articles was the law that must be clung to, government courts did not in the photo and all laws were actualized by state courts. The Constitution switched this by setting up a state court structure, which was designated the task of settling question between the occupants and furthermore the states.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

For example, the legislature in the Article was unicameral, called Congress, but the Constitution is bicameral, called Congress, divided into the House of Representatives and the Senate. Next, the member of Congress in the Article is between two and seven members per state, but in the Constitution, it is two Senators per state, Representatives apportioned per population of each state. Also, in the Article there was no executive, but in the Constitution the president is the executive. Lastly, the power to coin money in the Article it was the United States and the states, but in the Constitution, it is the United States

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

Before the government we have today was created we originally started off with the Articles of Confederation. This first form of government was weak since it couldn't enforce laws, regulate trade, and collect taxes. Even in this weak state, it continued to weaken. Around this time a rebellion named Shay's rebellion happened which made people fearful; causing them to want a stronger government. Therefore action was taken to change the articles of confederation.

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

There was a large idea of having the government separated with as little contact as possible between them. This largely translated into the constitution. Each of the different branches of government have their own section of the constitution. Within the different articles, the different guidelines of the government are stated. For example, in Article II, Section I, the ideas of allowing the people to vote on representatives and the president are stated.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

State constitutions grant powers that are no limited where the U.S. constitution’s main purpose was to limit powers. State constitutions often have longer documents, as said above; the U.S. constitution is a basic outline, where the state constitution has a more specific outline that acquires more documentation. The U.S. constitution has changed only 27 times over the past two centuries, where the state constitution has room for improvement and is always changing. The U.S. has a representative democracy system that rejects direct democracy as a form of government. The states however believed that those types of constitutional arrangements were simply obsolete and wanted to give the chance for citizens to have a chance to participate in the creating of laws.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences. Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

According to James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, he stated that “in the compound republic of America , the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments [state and federal]...” The federal government has more power than the state government but both governments communicate with each other so we can have a more peaceful country. According to several sources the central government has some power that the state government doesn’t like regulating trade, conducting foreign relations, providing an army and navy, declaring war, print and coin money, setting up post offices, and making immigration laws. Those several sources also said the state government actually has powers that the central government doesn’t, for example; setting up local governments, holding elections, establishing schools,passing marriage and divorce laws, and regulating in-state businesses. Even though both governments have more power than the other they all share some power: tax, borrowing money, setting up courts, making laws, and enforcing laws.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Us Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document