ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And Amending The Constitution

490 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Constitutions of usa essay

At the end of the Revolutionary war, the former colonies were united under Articles of Confederation that loosely bound the new states into a nation. Because of disputes between the states, a constitutional convention was called to improve the Articles of Confederation. Instead of amending the Articles of Confederation, the representatives at the convention decided to create an entirely new document, the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution established a form of government that balanced power between three branches of government and provided for self-governing states. The Federalists were a political group who supported the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were a political group who did not support the Constitution and a …show more content…

The Constitution, unlike the Articles of Confederation, was made into a new system by popular vote. Those who supported the Constitution called themselves Federalists. They followed classical notions of republicanism. They supported a central government system saying, that a carefully constructed government would get rid of any chance of possible tyranny. A republic could be large if the government's design prevented one group from having too much control. They believed in three branches of power, legislative, executive, and judicial. They also stated that there should be separate power between federal and state governments. The political group who did not support the constitution became known as Anti-Federalists. They did not support a central government. The thought that the states should have more power and that the rights of the people should be protected. The leaders of the Anti-Federalists were well know due to the revolutionary war. Other people who supported the well known Anti-Federalists were those who would benefit from an economic and political system less tight than the constitution. These people included Backcountry Baptists and

Show More
Related
616 Words | 3 Pages

The Public's opinion of the Constitution was divided into two separate groups known as the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Many of not all Federalists were wealthy and well educated with leaders like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. They were people who advocated a proposal or theory that of an orderly, efficient government could protect their economic status. The Federalists were also very well organized, also in many of the states they were often in control of the elections of ratifying

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

Federalists supported the constituion and wanted a strong elected government. They believed that a powerful national government was needed so that the nation would be protected and to address domestic issues. Federalists also believed that the Constitution should be allowed to place limitations on the powers of each branch of government. So therefore, Checks and Balances

Read More
355 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti federalists wanted a Monarchy, but this would cause trouble. Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the same Monarchy government, this would cause trouble because it is proven that monarchy causes violence between government and people. In monarchy the people would have no say in their country on the higher class would have a say. Federalists were also against having an army. Brutus

Read More
1606 Words | 7 Pages

Those who supported the Constitution were known as Federalists, while the opposing side were termed Anti-Federalists. Most Federalists were wealthy, well-educated, and strong leaders (like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin), while Anti-Federalists consisted mostly of farmers and lower class citizens (such as Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry). The Federalists simply could not believe the virtue of man was a strong and reliable enough foundation for a government, so they rooted for a structure of checks and balances. They levied for a strong, central government that contained the majority of the power over the states. Anti-Feds believed such a government would create a tyranny, so the states should retain most of the supremacy.

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States. This document officially created the government of the thirteen colonies and sets the laws and rights we still have and use till this day. In 1777, the original 13 colonies realized they needed some form of government. So this brought up the Articles of Confederation.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

The Federalists were a group of people that wanted a national government to be all as one instead of states having their own government. The anti-federalists were the ones that disagreed with having a national government. They thought that the select state should have power over itself in everything they did. The Federalist Party was an important part of

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

Anti-Federalists The two famous Anti-Federalists were Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams. The Anti-Federalists believed a) opposed the constitution needed a list of protected rights, b)They believed that each state should have the right to

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists favored a strong central government, and favored limiting the state powers, and thought 2 representatives from each was enough. Most Federalists were wealthy, well-educated, and put together by the desire for a powerful, centralized government. Their leaders were usually influential men like George Washington & Benjamin Franklin. They were advocates of an orderly, competent government that could protect their economic status.

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

The anti-federalist believed in giving the states more power. They argued that, “...the constitution was too distant from the people...” (II.2) They believed the central government should not have all the power over the states. The reason they wanted the states to have more power, was to give the people more say in what we want as a country.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

Let me start with what Antifederalist are: The Antifederalists were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists, they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent in state politics. In the approval debate, the Anti-Federalists conflicted the Constitution. Anti-federalists complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights.

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

After the American Revolution, a constitutional convention came together to create something called the Articles of Confederation. It was the document that would create the national government that would then unite the states as one. This new document did not last long. The Articles of Confederation was eventually changed to the United States Constitution. The Articles of Confederation created a single branch of government.

Read More
1474 Words | 6 Pages

The anti-federalist were the opposing party of the federalist disagreeing with the strong government. The anti-federalists had wanted a weaker government and had wanted individual rights for people by adding the bill of rights to the constitution. The anti-federalists were the type of political group who wanted rights for the people and for the United States, so everyone could have their individual rights as people. The anti-federalists believed that the federalists and the constitution was granting too much power to the federal courts at any expense. The Anti-federalists were arguing that the federal courts would be to far away to have justice for each average citizen.

Read More
272 Words | 2 Pages

In the 18th Century Federalist and Anti-Federalists went head to head, after the Constitution was created it had to be ratified by the states. There were a number of people at the time that did not want the federal or national government to hold power. These people were the Anti-Federalist, and they wanted sovereign and independent government. The Anti-Federalist had many strong members such as Patrick Henry and George Mason that were afraid if the Constitution was ratified they would lose their power. On the other side the Federalist wanted the ratification as they wanted a large nation.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists glorified power, specifically government-centered power, they seemed to obsess over the idea of control, because not only did they admire the Government’s authority, but they also supported the opposition of the Bill of Rights, which was meant to give people ineluctable liberties, like freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, and the right to a trial. Basic rights you would to give to anyone you respected, or simply acknowledged. Anti-Federalists, however, believed in less power from the Government, and more citizen based power, believing that giving people their own “individual liberties” would lead to said person making good decisions with the betterment of the nation in

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists had most support coming from merchants and others in cities/ coastal regions. The Federalists held the argument that without a strong central government, one the Constitution offered, that anarchy would become an issue. But a strong central government could protect against enemies while solving other, smaller issues. The Anti-Federalists opposed the new Constitution.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And Amending The Constitution

Open Document