Compare And Contrast The Historical Causation Of The Treaty Of Guadalupe Hidalgo

765 Words4 Pages

During the period of 1800-1848, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo made peace between America and Mexico where securing territorial goals was America’s drive. With the strong belief of Manifest destiny arising, the U.S took the opportunity to bargain and assume possession of western territory dominated by their southern neighbor. In turn, preceding the Mexican-American War and leading to the aftermath of The Civil War. The historical causation of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo from the period of a New Nation leading up to The Civil War in regards to America in the World, show the habitual act of the United States wanting to expand, being dissatisfied in its position in the world and remaining the ‘International Superpower.’
What is the Treaty …show more content…

In order to increase free-trade between the United States and the Hawaiian Kingdom, America implemented the “Reciprocity Treaty of 1875,” which secured a market for Hawaiian sugar in exchange for economic privileges that were denied everywhere else. After affirming friendship by way of signing the “Hawaii-United States Treaty” in 1826 which, opened up trade between the nations, this new policy set the stage for a future annexation of Hawaii. More than 75 years later, Hawaii is annexed as America’s new 50th state. “The cause of Hawaii and independence is larger and dearer than the life of any man connected with it,—” stated by Lili`uokalani, Hawaii's last Queen, show’s the importance of sovereignty to the former kingdom. However, The Hawaii-United States Treaty paid no respect to the autonomy of the islands. In 1849 another treaty was signed allowing further privilege, then came the Reciprocity Treaty until, America established a strong business presence in this island nation. In correlation to the events leading up to the Mexican Cession and maintaining the same ideals in Europe's ‘Scramble for Africa.’. Throughout the period, these expansionist views encouraged the need for individual rights protection and other motives for …show more content…

When the war broke out in 1861, a year after President Lincoln’s election, he deemed it as a central goal to preserve the union, when he states, “A government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free..." Majority of southern slaveholding states succeeded in the fear that Republicans would abolish slavery, the driving force behind their economy. As the situation grew more complex the debate over wanting to still withhold its newfound territory and the institution of slavery remained at the forefront of the war. Also hindering the United States’s position and facade as an ‘International Superpower.” 1865, the U.S Congress approved the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution which, abolished slavery. April 9, 1865 , General Robert E. Lee surrendered the The Union at the Appomattox Court House in Virginia. Wartime presented new opportunities for women and many turned to factory jobs instead of domesticated ones. Wartime effects emancipated slaves, implemented Jim Crow Laws and ruined Southern economy, leading to the Era of Reconstruction. At the end of the war America walked away a nation half in