ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Motives Of The Federalists

787 Words4 Pages

A constitution may be defined as principles that establish the function, powers, and limits of a country such that gives people equal rights. After the American Revolution, America had a zeal for a central government that will be stable and strong though the practiced confederation government where each state operated like an independent country. There was no president or judicial branch, they only operated with a single legislature and the congress of the confederation. They used the Article of Confederation which was the first American constitution that was later ratified in 1781. This American constitution is the most important document in America and the oldest constitution in the world. They debate to get a central government started when …show more content…

They were elitist. They believed in powerful central government; two-house legislature. Amongst the federalist, Alexander Hamilton. James Madison and John Jay wrote the eighty five essay known as the federalist papers. This paper presented the several motives and plans of the federalist; they saw the new constitution as a “republican remedy for the disease incident to republican government.” They believed that the organization of a new government would reduce the effects of political factions. They also pointed out that the great advantage of a federal system was to create a “happy combination” of a national government that is too large for any single faction to control. Also, it would create several state government that would be smaller and be responsive to local matters. They also stated that the proposed federal government separation of powers will stop any branch from violating the citizen’s right or taking over the national …show more content…

that it would render the states powerless. They also believed that the strength granted in the article of confederation will yield a better federal system and also that strong central government would tax their citizens heavily. Furthermore, the anti-federalist did not support the constitution because they believed that the U.S. Supreme Court would invalidate state laws and that there would be too much power for the president. They also feared the national government would run over the liberties of the people. Also, the proposed that the power of taxing by the congress be limited and that the military should consist of state militias rather than the national force. They didn’t leave out the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; the wanted the jurisdictions to be limited. There effective argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the

Show More
Related
975 Words | 4 Pages

It stated that giving states this right would be, “1st Blending together legislative and judicial powers. 2nd Hazarding an interruption of the peace of the states by civil discord, in case of a diversity of opinions among the state legislature. 3rd

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist Papers 78 and 79: The Judiciary Branch After the Revolution, America was in a very bad place. We had recently overthrown what many believed to be a tyranny. While many people argued our government needed more power, they were afraid of giving too much power. Keeping the Articles of Confederation or planning an entire new government was debated. Congress decided we needed a change.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Since they were all for the new constitution, they wanted to go ahead and make it. But the Anti-federalists didn’t want this. They were hesitant on this new government. So, that is why the Federalist papers were created. These were a series of 85 essays that tried to convince Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution.

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

Not long after the Constitutional Convention of 1787 had ended and the Constitution had been introduced to the American people for the ratification, there was a debate regarding those who supported the Constitution (Federalists) and those who opposed it (Anti-Federalists). Among those debates, one of the most central debates was whether to unite the thirteen states into a great nation or under the federal government. Perhaps, this question was the reason why some of the delegates kept their mouth shut in Philadelphia. Outstanding delegates such as James Madison and James Wilson had developed a plan that would renovate the American Union from loose independent states to a central nation that under the control of federal government but still

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

Two opposing groups formed. The first group was the Federalists. The Federalists favored a strong federal government. The second group was the Antifederalists who were led by Thomas Jefferson.

Read More
139 Words | 1 Pages

To compare and contrast the differences between the Federalists and the Democratic-republicans? Is by the federalists and the democratic-republicans both have people that put rules down too Rule by the wealthy class and Rule by the people but they are a different type of people like the wealthy class and the normal people. Another compare things they both have is that they both have strong governments but Alexander and Thomas had different governments like Alexander had a strong federal government and Thomas had a strong state government. Also, Alexander and Thomas had an alliance but with different people like Alexander had an alliance with British and Thomas had an alliance with the French. But an overall, they both had banks but, they both

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

What this entails is that the judicial branch should be exempt from partisan voting and elections and remain unbiased in their ruling. Supreme Court Justices were given life long terms in office to carry out their service, free from the interference from the executive and legislative offices. With too much reliance on the other two branches, the judicial system would become skewed away from blind justice and turn to ruling in favor of their political affiliation in hopes of gaining re-election. In the Federalist Papers #78, Hamilton explains that the judicial branches sole purpose is to interpret the Constitution and hold all trials in regard to the Constitution to see if a law has been broken.

Read More
99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

The central principle of the constitution is guidance of a people through governance, in relations with other governments, relations with its own citizens, commerce etc. The constitution of the United States is a written document. This document strongly emphasizes a strong streak of independence from control of a central authority. This is not surprising especially because the U.S. constitution was written in strong alignment with a United States fresh from independence from the British monarchy. The British Monarchy had increasingly imposed punitive laws on its subjects in the American colonies such as the imposition of taxes.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

They contended that in a little republic groups would grow effortlessly and make a division in the republic. There were two approaches to free a country of factionalism, as indicated by Federalist. The first was to demolish the freedom fundamental to its reality; the other was to give every subject the same. Since a huge republic would speak to such a large number of interests, it would be troublesome for groups to shape and control the administration. In the event that one group controlled the administration, they dreaded a lion's share group that would tyrannize the minority, as expressed by Federalist.

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

They believed the Constitution threatened their personal freedom and sovereignty of the states. They felt threatened instead of instead of protected. The Revolution War had concluded, and the American colonies had found themselves free of Britain. The Anti Federalist believed that the Constitution had comparable characteristics of the tyranny of Great Britain, which they fought so hard to remove themselves from. The Anti-federalist focused on power among the individual states and believes that common people should be able to be participants of their own

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

I think of a constitution as a way to prevent our government from going into chaos by establishing a set of rules that are fair and reasonable for everyone. A constitution can also strengthen the weaknesses of problems that our country faces and establish promises that will make it a better place. Alexander Hamilton also states that the necessity of a constitution as “the point at the examination of which we are now arrived.” (The Federalist Papers

Read More
1375 Words | 6 Pages

Since its inception in 1787, the U.S. Constitution has been considered as the oldest and most influential document. It laid down the principles and foundation which helped shape U.S. as a nation, and the more than one hundred countries that used it as a model for creating their own Constitution (Constitutionfacts.com, n.a.). But the circumstances during its creation were critical. The American War of Independence (1775-1783) against Great Britain had ended with the signing of the Treaty of Paris that gave sovereignty to the U.S. in 1783.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

The author of anti-federalist 17# was Robert Yates (not the serial killer), at the time he was a politician and judge also the oldest of his family. he lived in the state of New York and tried to run for governor. The document yates wrote was just about states that the anti-federalists did not desire a constitution as a result of they felt that it 'd offer the central government an excessive amount of power which it 'd remove all power from the states. "to raise and support armies at pleasure, in addition in peace as in war, and their management over the militia, tend not solely to a consolidation of the govt. , however the destruction of liberty..." a stronger central government would higher shield everybody and is additional for the good

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

Though the reserved powers supposedly gave the states the responsibility to deal with everything not given to the federal government, the federal government had also gained powers that the framers implicitly gifted it. The Marshall Court believed that the ‘Necessary and Proper Clause’, or the part of the Constitution which “empowers the Congress to make all laws ‘necessary and proper ‘ in order to carry out the federal government’s duties” enabled the federal government to claim these powers. This was the balancing act of Federalism, the national government had to be given enough power to be effective but not too much to be

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Motives Of The Federalists

Open Document