Justin Clement APUS DBQ Big businesses controlled the economy and politics throughout 1870-1900. They were in control of the prices for certain items because they destroyed their smaller competitors until there was no competition left. They had much sway over politics and took away the people’s say. As we can see from Document A, between 1870-1899, the price for food, fuel, lighting and living decreased with the emergence of big businesses.
In the stage following the Civil War, Industrialization had many leaders. These leaders helped boom the growth of the economy and the industry in the United States. As historians have looked closer at the people who helped America become one of the leading industrial powers of the world, they’ve come to question the honesty of how these leaders really obtained their fortunes. The industrial and business leaders of the 1865-1900, also known as “Robber Barons, used various methods in order to build up their own wealth and power. These would use mechanisms that would go against the public population more often than not and those that would go near extremes.
Phillips-Fein’s writing provides historical examples that helped back her overall message of Invisible Hands; her message being that the business elites had heavy political influence during the four decades of the period. A book that can be compared to Phillips-Fein’s work is Jim Powell’s FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression. In this writing we see more of a one sided view of liberalism with a lot of history based around Roosevelt rather than the conservative movement. However, in both writings we can trace a similarity in the New Deal and draw a conclusion that there were those who supported more government regulations and those who did not.
As described by the illustrator of a political cartoon about industry, “This frequently reproduced cartoon… depicts corporate interests… as giant money bags looming over the tiny senators at their desks in the Chamber.” (Captain of Industry and Robber Barons Political Cartoon). During the Gilded Age, the US government encouraged laissez-faire legislation and did not limit monopolization of industries. Captains of industry often paid politicians to protect their interests. Thus, the politics in the US changed to have a more favorable attitude towards big business, and legislation promoted such industry.
Throughout the Progressive Era the government worked to restrict the power of unregulated big business and provide tariff and banking reforms. I believe one of the central debate initiators was when trusts and monopolies became customary, people were usually forced to accept expensive prices and poorer quality product. Laborers were exploited through the smallest salary and dangerous working circumstances, even though employers wanted to prevent the development of labor unions Muckrakers, who were influential journalists, worked to show unjustness and error in American. In 1902, urban political machines were called out by the muckrakers. Lincoln Steffens began strikes against unethical government relationships with large businesses in
The progressive presidents all took a multitude of measures to give the government more control over corporations by breaking up monopolies and busting trusts, but none of them advanced the concept of socialism that populists had wanted. President Theodore Roosevelt did not necessarily want to break down big companies, but wanted to even the playing field and created a program called the Square Deal that kept big businesses from taking advantage of small companies and the poor. This program was aimed towards helping the middle class and attacking bad trusts and satisfied a populist contention on controlling monopolies. In 1903, he passed the Elkins act, which stopped railroads from giving rebates for bigger businesses. This stabilized and reduced
Thesis : After the Civil War, America was in a post-war boom. During the 1870-1890, big business moguls, such as Rockefeller and Carnegie, create huge corporations which not only affected the economy, but also affected the political realm of America. While many may assume that during the rise of these big business helped to change the economy and politics, the real focus was on the responses formed by society, such as labor unions, increase public outcry, and political opposition groups that helped to change society. A: Economically, big business flourished during the late 1800s.
This essay will generally analyze the relationship between the government and businesses, and how “Big Business” essentially took control of the Gilded Age. America’s first true big business mostly arose because of the railroads, which is fairly significant, because it essentially helped lead the development of other business barons such as, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J. Pierpont Morgan who all had particularly extraordinary accomplishments in shaping our economy. Most of these men who created big businesses after the Civil War were driven by a compelling desire to become rich and influential.
In the post-Civil War United States corporations grew significantly in number, size and influence. Big business had a major impact on the economy and politics in America resulting in changes for many American citizens. As been noted, one way in
SAQ #1 One governmental practice during this era was siding with and supporting corporations in most issues. For example, the creation of the ICC was done with intent to regulate economic activity, but its structure only allowed action to be taken in court, where corporations almost always won. This caused growing animosity between farmers and railroad corporations, because farmers felt they were still being cheated. The idea of “social darwinism” contributed to the battle between labor and management, because it claimed that those who were meant to succeed would, and those unfit for the competitive world would fail.
During this era, Progressives saw that big business had the potential for corporate monopolies and influencing the political system. Progressives also saw that a stronger government could be the balance to the corporate world or be the new route to control the political system (Kettl 2015, 39). Woodrow Wilson would come on the scene suggesting
Funny how history works, FDR and Truman were the right Presidents at the right time. FDR introduced the greatest amount of domestic liberal economic legislation as part of his New Deal domestic program. Measures like the Conservation Corps (CCC), Works Progress Administration (WPA) and Tennessee Valley Authority employing over 8.5 million people and the cost of $10 Billion (Burran 2008). Although Hamby’s Liberalism and Its Challengers clarifies that new Deal failed to establish a variety of socialistic ideas and resolve all the problems, the credit is given for at least smoothing out some difficult times (Hamby 1992, 50). This tame depiction of becoming the model of modern economic liberalization that remains today then is followed by President
The chaos set out by the Great Depression on the American people set the stage for radical reform of the variety brought upon by Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration and the New Deal. However, this administration ran into the issue that it is difficult to give without the power to do so. The thing the Roosevelt administration was trying to give the American people was a stable economy which would drastically improve the Positive Liberty of the populace, yet to do so it would need to take power away and vest it in the hands of the federal Government. In doing so, FDR’s New Deal Liberalism would balance the ideas of Positive and Negative liberty by slightly lowering the Negative liberty of the states and corporations in order to greatly advance
Huthmacher conveys that liberalism of Americans made the type of political system they were wanting. He asserted that the government got involved because of how the lower class portrayed their rights and voted for legislation. The low class was looking for improvement for working conditions. He provided job security, better wages and working conditions, and gave some benefits of production to consumers. “As a result, we find urban lower-class representatives introducing a large variety of business regulatory measures on the local and state levels during the Progressive Era”(Huthmacher 13).
The Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act both defined what the government considered a trust to be and allowed the government to dissolve trusts and monopolies by making them illegal. However, the Antitrust Movement didn’t come without any setbacks. For one, the general consensus on big business among the general American population was positive. Business lobbying was used by companies to convince government officials, and consequently the American working class, that the booming businesses of the nineteenth century were beneficial to the economy and to the individual buyer or employee. Corporate lobbying was used to heavily influence policymakers into lessening the severity and enforcement of antitrust laws in the Sherman Act.
