More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis on romeo and juliet
Character analysis for romeo and juliet essay
Literary analysis on romeo and juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis on romeo and juliet
“To a father growing old nothing is dearer than a daughter” (Euripides). In Act Three, Scene Five of William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Lord Capulet, the father of Juliet, learns that Juliet did not want to get married to Paris. In this monologue, he insults Juliet for thinking about turning down the offer and gives reasons on why she should accept the marriage. Lord Capulet uses diction to emphasize how Juliet does not have the power to turn down this proposal. For example, as he is describing Juliet, he exclaims, “And then to have a wretched puling fool, /
he fact that Romeo is in Juliet 's room, his families rival, and he is a wanted fugitive for killing her cousin, also makes this dangerous for him. However, she wants him to stay longer, but Romeo understands the danger, because "more light and light" brings the possibility of capture and death (Act 3, Scene 5). During, Act 3, Scene 5, Romeo seems like he uses rational thought and maturity, by pointing this out to Juliet. Also, in the final scene of Act 3, Juliet forshadows, when she saw Romeo defending her window, by asking Romeo, "Thou art so low," and, "thou looks 't pale," (Act 3, Scene 5).
In this particular part of act two scene two of Romeo and Juliet, Juliet is sitting on her balcony, thinking aloud about Romeo as he listens quietly in the bushes. Once he speaks to her, they begin to talk about the risks of what they are doing in the moment and Romeo’s love for her. In this scene, Juliet is contemplating what this love would mean between a Montague and a Capulet and wants to be able to love Romeo without having to worry about the name that defines them. Before she hears Romeo speak, she says to herself, “’Tis but thy name is my enemy. / Though art thyself, though not a Montague. /… /
One of the many themes in William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is fate. Mercutio contributes to this theme when he dies and he starts a chain of deaths including his own which eventually ends with Romeo and Juliet’s deaths. Mercutio forces the houses to continue fighting even though Romeo try’s to stop the fighting. Mercutio continued the fate of the houses fighting. When Tybalt tried to fight Romeo he refused to fight in hopes to prevent bloodshed, but Mercutio fought Tybalt instead.
Mercutio being an easily influenced guy caused his death and the 2 more. On the day of his own death, Mercutio was confronted by Tybalt. Tybalt tried to get a fight out of Mercutio without being the one to start the fight. Tybalt plan prevailed and Mercutio succumbed to his anger which eventually caused his own death. This leads up to Tybalt’s death, Romeo’s banishment, Friar Lawrence’s plan, and the unfortunate death of Romeo and Juliet.
Though Mercutio should be held accountable for the fight that led to Tybalt’s and his own death in William Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet, Romeo’s inability to make sensible decisions in potentially challenging or stressful moments makes him most responsible. Mercutio’s taunting of Tybalt is justified as Tybalt had just called Romeo, his best friend, a villain. Contrastingly, Romeo’s behavior during the fight was irrational at best. In the first scene of the third act, Mercutio and Tybalt are dueling, Mercutio develops a wound which will lead to his death.
Mercutio dies under Romeo’s arm as Romeo tries to stop the fight but just ends up getting Mercutio killed. Mercutio says as he’s dying, “A plague on both of your houses.” Which might’ve triggered Romeo to be more angered than before, and he finally fought Tybalt and killed him. The prince gets there afterwards and says that, “Immediately we exile him hence.” Which is what his decision to kill Tybalt caused for him.
If Mercutio had kept his mouth shut, and not stood up for Romeo in such a dumb way, Romeo would not have killed Tybalt, and thus not been
I believe this due to the fact that if Romeo had simply fought back against Tybalt, then Mercutio wouldn’t have come to Romeo’s aid. And if Mercutio hadn’t come to his aid then he wouldn't have quarreled with Tybalt, this quarrel ultimately leading to Mercutio's demise. Those with opposing views may push the agenda that Mercutio may have died either way, as Mercutio may still have come to Romeo's aid even if he fought but this simply would not hold up as with Mercutio’s last breath he cursed both the Montague and Capulet houses, clearly indicating that he had desire to be involved in the two houses feud, and I find this as sufficient evidence that Mercutio would not have came to Romeo's aid if he had simply fought
Death finally crept into him as he lay motionless on the ground and at that moment the cheerful and comedic mood that Mercutio created disappeared into thin air. Although Mercutio was used to create a comedic mood, he also indirectly impacted both Romeo and the feud itself. Mercutio’s loyalty towards his friends plays an especially crucial role in revealing new sides of Romeo and impacting the feud. As demonstrated in act 3, scene 1, where Mercutio got agitated by Romeo’s lack of response to Tybalt insulting him. Which resulted in Mercutio and Tybalt to fight, eventually leading to his death.
He was killed by Tybalt but if Romeo had not gotten in the way then Mercutio would not have had a chance to stab him. Romeo had too much trust in his cousin that he did not think he would take advantage of Mercutio's position. Romeo did not look into the past and realized that the hate between the families would not simply disappear when he got in the way. From this we can learn that with loyalty comes trust that can be exploited and cause death. The death of Mercutio leads Romeo into a rage which ends with Tybalt's death.
The final reason that Romeo is at fault for Tybalt 's death is that Romeo actually killed Tybalt. “This gentleman, the Prince’s near ally, My very friend, hath got his mortal hurt In my behalf. My reputation stained With Tybalt’s slander. “(3.1.70-74). This means that Mercutio is a family member of the Prince, Romeo’s friend and that Mercutio got hurt on Romeo’s watch and that Mercutio tried to protect Romeo from Tybalt’s smack talk.
This sole fact makes it more than obvious that those situations required a quick clever solution, and were not easy to solve at all. However, if Romeo had stopped for a second to think, and use previous experiences as lessons instead of acting hastily, the outcomes to those situations would have probably been more favorable. To conclude this essay, it would be wise to convey the points given into a new outcome to the story. Once Romeo had seen the fight start between Mercutio and Tybalt, he should have stayed where he was. Asking them to stop was a "valiant" move, but interfering could cause disaster in between.
Tybalt challenges Romeo to a duel and he declines the challenge and insists that he won’t fight Tybalt. Mercutio is angered by Romeo’s “cowardice” and takes on Tybalt himself. Romeo wants Mercutio to stop fighting Tybalt so he decides that it’d be a good idea to block his arm in mid combat and Tybalt stabs Mercutio from under Romeo’s arm and Mercutio falls dead after rambling about plagues and a pun or two. Romeo doesn’t realize that it is his own fault that Mercutio died after Mercutio even blamed his wound on him. Romeo lets his emotions decide his actions and becomes enraged and ignores that Tybalt is now his family and fails to see that he was the reason Mercutio was killed.
When he is killed, it signifies the transition of the play from comedy to tragedy. There are clear-cut reasons, however, why Mercutio was destined to perish. Not only can we blame his death on his immature nature, but also on the actions and choices of Romeo and Tybalt. Concerning Mercutio’s demise, a few of his characteristics may have come into play.
