ipl-logo

Comparing Christianity And Plato's Republic

1070 Words5 Pages

Modern Political Philosophers goal is to discover the best possible way man can rule successfully in a regime. At the same time, the Christian Political Philosopher’s goal is to make a difference by making the political life for every citizen he best regime capable. Christianity emphasizes and overlaps ideas needed for a successful regime already reasoned by Aristotle and Plato. St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas study the ancient philosopher's reasoning and conclude that Christianity significantly differs by fulfilling our wounded nature into the ultimate end: Eternal Happiness. Christianity and Plato come together to stresses the virtues of the citizen in the ideal regime
Plato’s Republic demands the practice of virtue and imagines the …show more content…

Both sides agree that the household is important for the foundation of peace and tranquility(Book 19.Ch. 16-17 ) In Aristotle’s Politics, the household is a vital cell of society, the basis of the community to be ruled. The community in order to function well between different class needs peace. That Peace is needed for the political order, creates the opportunity for citizens to love the good things (Book 19 Ch. 24). The mixed regime while not that good has virtue available for everybody, it must be for the ruling class. The ruler’s justice in the political order exists the ruler rule his city obediently and the follow him obediently (Book 19 Ch.23). Aristotle emphasis on letting the laws, not the men in obedience (92.2) .When we are obedient to our rulers, then we can know ourselves virtuously (Q.94.5). Christianity teaches that there is only one ruler himself and that the natural law was given to us by Him and we need his precepts to save us from our …show more content…

The Eternal law is a plan of divine wisdom which is to direct all actions of rational creatures(Q93.1) The eternal law is not selected for the few but all members of any regime(93.1). However, people who rule and live in vice do not live for God. People who rule for virtue and by virtue know who do is and wish to follow God. The men can choose whether to be in the heavenly regime or not. With Christ, bringing His law manifested, it’s the job of social, virtuous men willingly enacting laws on the behalf of

Show More
Related
1175 Words | 5 Pages

In Doc 1 written by the Roman historian, Florus in c.150 says that there should not be a war with slaves and men should not be forced to follow the rules of a cruel ruler. Also, he stated that since the rulers/masters were cruel to their people, the ones that escaped tried to take revenge. On the other hand, in Doc 2, written by Han fei tzu, a Legalist philosopher, believed that the kingdom would be weak if the laws were weak. To prevent this, he said that there should be one supreme ruler that has absolute control over everything in the way that he wants to so as to not lose power and authority. This is significant because these liabilities and benefits show how, depending on how the government was run, and how the rulers treated their people,

Read More
321 Words | 2 Pages

Many people debate over which form of government is best. In his In Praise of the Emperor Constantine, Eusebius Pamphilus argues that monarchy is the superior. Monarchy reflects God’s created order. There is one God, not two or three, and thus there ought to be one ruler (WH: 357, 27). Eusebius argues that because God is divine and perfect and holly, and because He (God) created humans in His own image, humans ought to emulate God and His order (WH: 358, 11).

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

In paragraph twelve the King brings up the clergy’s point of his willingness to break laws. In response to this King quotes St. Augustine “an unjust law is no law at all.” In order to counter this point King asserts “just and unjust laws require moral judgement.” Therefore meaning morally unjust laws should not be followed. This allows King to appeal to those who regard morals as the way to live life.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

By dismantling the clergymen’s claim, King proves the innocence and integrity of his actions. In another attempt at criticizing him, the clergymen claim that King must advocate for protesters to adhere to and comply with all laws, regardless of their opinions, because he constantly demands for peaceful protest. However, he refutes this statement by alluding to St. Augustine’s belief “that ‘an unjust law is no law at all’” (King 4). St. Augustine’s comment on the legitimacy of a law signifies that if a law is immoral or degrades the human character, then the law is deemed invalid and should never have been instituted in the first place.

Read More
363 Words | 2 Pages

"Charles," a short story by Shirley Jackson, has held readers' attention for many years. The tale represents the epitome of Jackson's literary brilliance, engrossing readers with its intriguing plot, likeable characters, and deep issues. This story has been read countless times, and each time someone finds something new that enhances the narrative's attractiveness. The reader grows increasingly fixated on Laurie's activities and the crimes of the elusive Charles as the novel goes on. When Laurie's mother finally meets Charles' mother at her PTA meeting, tensions reach a height, and a final shocking turn leaves readers in shock.

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

These reasons will prevent anarchy because one has a conscience to determine which laws to follow and which ones do not; therefore, one shows loyalty to the authority of law and also loyalty to one’s

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

Justice is not the conception of the strong, while the weak are ruled by unjust rulers how Thrasymachus thought. Instead the ruler, rules accordingly establishing just laws even if they seem unfair. Rulers are infallible, thus creating just laws because if a ruler were to make an unjust law for the strong that would place the weak at an advantage creating a flaw in the argument. The ruler would want to create laws that are filled wisdom so that nobody would want to choose the life where an unjust men would be more profitable than a just men. In addition, Socrates demonstrates that an unjust men will not be able to live a more virtuous lifestyle than a just men due to the lack of learning that the unjust men has no recollection of, thus the just men will not be able to get the better of another just men.

Read More
1353 Words | 6 Pages

In the discussion on the methods of governing and administration of a state, one cannot leave out the models proposed by Confucius as well as Mencius. Both advocated that the ruler or the government has to rule by virtue and strengthen moral education among its people. Political leaders have to set moral examples for the people to follow, and to be benevolent towards their subordinates and citizens. By doing so, that would bring about social stability and population growth within the state, also creating conditions that would lead to an improvement in the welfare of the people. By fulfilling his duties to the people, a just and benevolent ruler would then be justified to rule by the Mandate of Heaven.

Read More
1559 Words | 7 Pages

In Book 1 of Plato 's Republic, Socrates and Thrasymachus engage in a passionate, and often acrimonious, conversation regarding the relationship between a ruler and those he or she rules. Their conversation raises substantive questions about both the nature and purpose of government and the motivations and roles of those who govern. The following will address these questions by 1) explaining both Socrates ' and Thrasymachus ' understandings of the ruler-ruled relationship and 2) addressing the merits of each argument and offering my own philosophical position on the matter. First, with respect to Thrasymachus ' position, he believes that rulers craft laws for their "own advantage," and he considers justice to be the "advantage of the stronger"

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

Is out of harmony with the moral law.” (356). This illustrates for the clergymen where each type of law stands in a moral position. Each type of law affects a person’s personality in a negative or positive way. The just laws are typically laws voted for by the people, s

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

Plato's Republic is centered on one simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust? This is something that Socrates addresses both in terms of political communities and the individual person. Plato argues that being just is advantageous to the individual independent of any societal benefits that the individual may incur in virtue of being just. I feel as if Plato’s argument is problematic. There are not enough compelling reasons to make this argument.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.

Read More
1750 Words | 7 Pages

Upon evaluating Aristotle’s ideals of citizenship, one finds a world wherein citizenship and freedom are one in the same – active participation in debate and deliberation in the political community through the exclusively human use of reason and speech capacities. Given this ideal of citizenship, it becomes the case that the ideas for human flourishing and thus the good life follow suit. For Aristotle, human flourishing comes from the cultivation of virtue that is a result of continued participation in the political community, or, continued intentional citizenship. For the good life, it is important to note that it is the continued practice of virtuous activity, rather than the obtaining, that is required. For, “…possession of virtue seems actually compatible with being asleep, or with lifelong inactivity, and, further, with the greatest sufferings and misfortunes; but a man who was living so no one would call happy…”

Read More
1333 Words | 6 Pages

Only those who are born with true philosophical understanding can rule. In the Second Treatise by John Locke, Locke addresses the state of nature, which is essentially equality and freedom. Even though people have liberty, they still need to obey natural laws. On the contrary of Plato’s just city, Locke believes that absolute authority is not a civil government. A civil society is where the majority rules.

Read More
984 Words | 4 Pages

“Plato’s philosophy is an attempt to justify Socrates’ belief in the objectivity of moral virtues.” As one of Socrates’ most loyal disciples, Plato’s own philosophy was heavily influenced by Socrates’ own thoughts and teachings. Much of Plato’s philosophy is a direct extension of some of the questions Socrates posed, i.e., Socrates asked what justice is, and Plato explored this question in his own writings. It is Socrates’ code of ethics, however, that most closely corresponds with Plato’s ethics.

Read More

More about Comparing Christianity And Plato's Republic

Related Topics

Open Document