ipl-logo

Aristotle's Citizenship

1750 Words7 Pages

Debate surrounding the question of citizenship, and the ensuing ideals about what makes a good life, has existed for as long as citizenship itself – providing many contrasting views and interpretations about the peak of human flourishing. Aristotle himself recognizes this fact, stating that “…there is often dispute about the citizen…since not everyone agrees that the same person is a citizen” (Politics 65). This is indicative, then, of the fact that there will be many different interpretations of human existence and its purpose; due to the fact that there is not even agreement on citizenry and what the ideas of it reflect for human life. The juxtaposition of two such views, those of Aristotle and Locke, allow thinkers to evaluate not only two …show more content…

Upon evaluating Aristotle’s ideals of citizenship, one finds a world wherein citizenship and freedom are one in the same – active participation in debate and deliberation in the political community through the exclusively human use of reason and speech capacities. Given this ideal of citizenship, it becomes the case that the ideas for human flourishing and thus the good life follow suit. For Aristotle, human flourishing comes from the cultivation of virtue that is a result of continued participation in the political community, or, continued intentional citizenship. For the good life, it is important to note that it is the continued practice of virtuous activity, rather than the obtaining, that is required. For, “…possession of virtue seems actually compatible with being asleep, or with lifelong inactivity, and, further, with the greatest sufferings and misfortunes; but a man who was living so no one would call happy…” (Ethics 938). It is not enough to state that one is virtuous, nor is it enough for someone to be born virtuous and end there. Rather, it is the continuous pursuit, the juxtaposition of virtuous activity and of that which isn’t, that allows an individual to flourish in an Aristotelian society. We can deduce, then, that “…human …show more content…

Moreover, as much as the acquisition of wealth for its own right is in opposition to what constitutes virtue in the Aristotelian society (Politics), this capitalist ideal is found present in the definition of the Lockean good life. Due to the fact that citizenship is the duty to be watchful of the government, and freedom is one of non-interference in the pursuit of a private life, the good life then is adherence to these ideals. Freedom and thus human flourishing, then, are obtained when the individual adheres to the nature of law in regards to being mindful of consumption, whilst securing their own property through the combination of their labor with the land. Under the common wealth they have agreed to, property will be secure. The individual is free to flourish and secure property. Moreover, they are able to embark on wealth accusation without letting communal resource lay to waste, through the use of currency. “…a man may fairly possess more land than he himself can use the product of, by receiving in exchange for the over plus gold and silver…” (The Second Treatise of Government 29). Man may flourish through property acquisition, wealth acquisition, and the security from common wealth to know they will remain unchallenged to their own. In terms of the duty citizenship, this ideal

Show More
Related
313 Words | 2 Pages

In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that the human good is the soul’s activity that expresses virtue. Aristotle concludes this from an invalid argument. On the one hand I do agree that the activity expressing virtue is a requirement for the human good. But on the other hand, I insist that the human good is a state and not an action. By modifying this argument, I believe we can reach a new conclusion that will help us better understand what Aristotle meant by these concepts.

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

Out of the two civilizations Athens and Rome one clearly had a better citizenship system. Rome had a better system of citizenship when you compared the definition of citizenship to that civilization, their rights, and responsibilities. Rome 's definition was much more generous when they gave their citizenship. Document A showed that free native-born adult males, free native-born adult females, free native-born male children, female children, and sons of freed slaves could get citizenship in Rome. In Athens they only allowed free, native-born adult males to get citizenship.

Read More
229 Words | 1 Pages

John Locke views civil society—a group that is under the authority of an exclusive leader who is in charge of protecting their welfare through legislation—as a crucial repellant to absolute monarchy as well as vital to protecting an individual’s property, because its origin which is the paternal model where an individual gives up certain rights in return for protection from an executive. In his Second Treatise on Government, Locke pushes the idea that God did not intend for a man to be alone, but to have the option of joining a society amongst other men. Continuing with this notion, he explains the origins of the civil society through the paternal model which he considers as the beginning of society of people coming together under one man.

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

When it comes to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, I believe that he has found a common thread in humanity in the fact that humans strive for the moderate in living virtuously. However, I would argue that the thread is varied enough to have no true worth in discerning the aspects of humanity. People have too different moralities and goals. Because Aristotle allows for these “local variations”, as Martha Nussbaum later terms in her defense of Aristotle, he is acknowledging that there cannot be an overarching analysis of humanity.

Read More
1559 Words | 7 Pages

Seth Andrews Dr. Daniel Cistro ENGL 1102 03/10/2023 The Separation of Selfishness The great philosopher Aristotle provided an exciting take in his famous work “Nicomachean Ethics” in chapter VIII of the ninth book; where he divides selfishness into two spheres; one representing noble selfishness shown by one who seeks virtue, honor, and good works, and the other representing the simple "vulgar" selfishness shown by one who chases after worldly things. Everyone falls into one of these spheres; what separates the two is that the good man can reason with others while the simple man is too engulfed with his own passions to acknowledge anyone else. The noble character is the most selfish of them all, but he enriches his community

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

Does John Locke have an answer to Aristotle’s question of: “what is a good citizen”? Aristotle wants to explore and understand nature of different states and constitutions but in order to do that, he argues that first we would have to take a deeper look at the nature of citizenship. Aristotle believes that saying that a citizen is someone who lives in a city or has access to the courts of laws is not enough, he supplements this argument by mentioning other people groups that has access to these things as well, specifically slaves and resident aliens (The Politics of Aristotle, 2009, p. 122). Instead, Aristotle proposes an idea that citizen is someone who upholds the public office and participates in administration of justice, this definition, which he suggests is only applicable to individuals in democratic state, is then further broadened stating that: “a citizen is anyone who is entitled to share in deliberative or judicial office”. To understand if John Locke has an answer to Aristotle’s question or if he’s even interested in such a question it is necessary to look deeper and explore more how Aristotle and John Locke views the states and constitutions, how they explain them and what are their views on citizenship (if they have any).

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

The purpose of the government is to ensure that every citizen has equal rights and privileges, to defend every member of the society, and to promote both the public and private interests of the people. The issue of how to best protect and promote both private and public interests was addressed by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. In his work, Leviathan, Hobbes proposes that absolute monarchy is the ideal type of government because under the other types of government, the citizens will pursue their private interests at the expense of the public interests. In contrast, Locke’s work, Second Treatise of Government, propose that a democracy is the proper solution to achieve the goal of the government in terms of equality for all its people. Locke’s

Read More
1812 Words | 8 Pages

John Locke’s Stance on Property “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” While writing the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson believed these ideals were to be the focus of the government. This phrase, however, was adapted from John Locke’s focus of government: “Life, liberty, and property.” John Locke, unlike other philosopher such as Hobbes, believed that personal property was essential for life and protecting that property was to protect yourself. Locke also believes that with the ownership of property comes unequal property ownership Today, there are still debates on what constitutes one’s property and how to implement policies that can create an equal distribution of property (ex. The wage gap).

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

With his two huge works the Two Treatises of Government and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding he revolutionized political philosophy and set out to state that we obtain ideas though our experiences in the world. With this paper I will analyze the ideas and philosophies that John Locke presented and discuss them.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

Eli Brown Recitation 013 Steven Vanderheiden Isaac Sours Locke On Property Inequality In John Locke’s Second Treatise, Locke lays out principles of a liberal democracy. In the text Locke argues that individuals have natural rights life, liberty, and property. He then argues that these rights should be protected by a government, that also has the consent of those that it governs. Locke also argues that if the people believe that the government is no longer protecting their natural rights, they have the right to overthrow that government.

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

As we have established, if the primary role of the state is to secure and maintain the most possible happiness for the people, the surely an unjust state would not be a state capable of achieving this goal. Monarchies seem the ideal constitution to Aristotle because the virtue of the monarch is not diluted by the potentially selfish desires of others. However, this is also the least stable of the

Read More
1819 Words | 8 Pages

“Every skill and every inquiry, and similarly every action and rational choice, is thought to aim at some good; and so the good has been aptly described as that which everything aims. But it is clear that there is some difference between ends: some ends are activities, while others are products which are additional to the activities. In cases where there are ends additional to the actions, the products are by their nature better than activities.” (Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, as translated by Crisp, 2000, p. #3) Aristotle was the first philosopher who wrote a book on ethics titled, Nichomachean Ethics.

Read More
1604 Words | 7 Pages

Essay 1 Aristotle and John Locke both believe humans were not created to live alone but instead among other people of the same community. Humans are not independent beings, and those who live in isolation lack the purpose of life: becoming a citizen and exercising one 's full potential of human flourishing. According to Aristotle, the collective community or multitude of citizens coexisting with one another is happiness, whereas Locke believes that the collective community is protecting autonomy and property. Both philosophers believe that to become a citizen, one must contribute to politics with the intent of creating a better society for all. Aristotle and Locke however, have differing views on how a person accomplishes this.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the history, there have been heated discussions on what constitutes a good life. Philosophers have given different annotations on the meaning of good life based on their beliefs, perspectives or even scientific-based evidences. Some view a good life as an accumulation of material goods that brings “large amount” of pleasure to oneself. On the other hand, Mencius and Aristotle advocate good life as possessing of pleasure that incorporates ethical values and they believe that by doing so one will experience enduring happiness. There is no ultimate right or wrong for these interpretations since this is not a factual question.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

There is a contention between what people need and what serves their interests and what is required for the welfare, wellbeing and security of the whole gathering. Government needs to direct that contention. Contingent upon the kind of view that is agent concerning the idea of the social course of action and the idea of government, the contention will be settled for either sets of interests Furthermore, we need to debate the question whether self-interest has gained the upper hand in recent times, whether there is a tendency away from the common good towards self-interest and even more problematically: egoism (i.e., distinction between self-interest and egoism), whether there is a primacy of self-interest in our economic system, and whether we are living in an era of self-interest, in a self-society or within an utilitarian regime? Finally, is there a change in values and a ‘trans-valuation of values’ (Nietzsche) in our

Read More

More about Aristotle's Citizenship

Open Document