ipl-logo

Martha Nussbaum's Argument Analysis

1217 Words5 Pages

When it comes to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, I believe that he has found a common thread in humanity in the fact that humans strive for the moderate in living virtuously. However, I would argue that the thread is varied enough to have no true worth in discerning the aspects of humanity. People have too different moralities and goals. Because Aristotle allows for these “local variations”, as Martha Nussbaum later terms in her defense of Aristotle, he is acknowledging that there cannot be an overarching analysis of humanity. He leaves room for error here in order for his logic to not be fully challenged and disregarded, but this is allowing for relativism, exactly what Martha Nussbaum argues against in her Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian …show more content…

Nussbaum attempts to explain her understanding of Aristotle’s argument, “What he does, in each case, is to isolate a sphere of human experience that figures in more or less any human life, and in which more or less any human being will have to make some choices rather than others, and act in some way rather than another”. Instead of giving any concrete forms to living virtuously, Nussbaum explains there is a general way that Aristotle says that we should act. This is where Nussbaum’s and Aristotle’s argument connect in their generalities and therefore, things get messy. In saying that there is a general framework, this allows for variations in relating certain actions to certain virtues. For example, if someone were to take their many Christmas presents and give them to a family who did not receive any gifts, this could be seen as temperance or generosity depending on the way you look at it. This then forces an overlap of the spheres, meaning instead of individual spheres of human experience, all experiences end up connecting with each other, perpetuating the theme of relativism. In a science example, if one looks at the periodic table and different molecules, CH4 and HSO4 could be considered in the same sphere in this sense because they both contain hydrogen, but in reality are totally different molecules with very different uses. Just because one part of something could be similar to a part of something else, does not mean that these things are the same or even similar. By using these general terms and making a general framework, this leaves room for variation and overlap, proving that this argument regarding separate spheres of human experience is baseless and that they are all much more connected and

Show More
Related
1529 Words | 7 Pages

Alexa Kersting was a young fourteen-year-old girl from West Fargo waiting for a life-changing lung transplant. Kersting was diagnosed with lung disease by the age of seven, and developed pulmonary hypertension-- high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart-- by the age of twelve (“Pulmonary Hypertension”). Once she was diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension, she was placed on the transplant waiting list, and for the upcoming months Alexa was on that list, she was on oxygen twenty-four hours a day. Unfortunately, she could never do any of the things other “normal” children could do due to her illnesses and treatments, meaning her hobbies had to be less strenuous, such as piano and art. Thankfully,

Read More
357 Words | 2 Pages

Gretchen Weirob’s argument is based on the view that physical identification is more important towards personal identity rather than psychological features. For example, Weirob believes that a person can identify with their body because they can see their body and it’s certain capacity; the body is very rational. Which is why she would not want her brain to be put into someone else’s body. She believes the body is the unique differentiation to an individual’s identification. Her argument becomes clear when she discusses the idea that someone can be manipulated, put under hypnosis or delusional to think that a different body from Weirob’s is Gretchen Weirob.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

In this section, he mentions very influential philosophers. Among these is Aristotle. These big names are thrown around and it can be very easy for an average person to feel overwhelmed by the genius that Heinrichs uses to support his argument. In his introduction paragraph, Heinrichs states, “...our definition of virtue becomes the opposite of Aristotle’s?” and then goes on to say, “You get an antirhetorical nation, like the one we have now.”

Read More
67 Words | 1 Pages

Nora Rodriguez is ahero because she helps immigrants with their immigration paper work. The article states that "a honduran women runs a business helping central americans with thier immagration paper work. Also she is a hero because she spoke up for the people about thier injusties. The article says that "she has gone from simply providing a support service to demmanding change regarding the injustes and discrimination.

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

Strive for Gender Neutral Bathrooms The recent hot debate in our society focuses on the new controversial policy for public bathrooms to be identified as gender neutral. People who identify as a gender other than their biological sex are allowed to use the bathroom based on how they identify themselves. Elizabeth Vliet, is a current physician, has acquired specialized training from Johns Hopkins Sexual Medicine Consultation team, and provides her stance about the gender neutral bathroom policy will promote the increase of danger, especially for women. Vliet has treated numerous patients over the years regarding sex and gender issues.

Read More
259 Words | 2 Pages

Lynn uses the rulings of appellate courts to disprove the myth among pit bull advocates, that pit bulls are unidentifiable. The author begins the article by addressing the case of Ohio v. Anderson, and that it was decided that a dog owner of ordinary intelligence can determine if they own a dog commonly known as a pit bull. Moreover she addresses that pit bull advocates state that pit bulls are unidentifiable and that there is no such thing as a pit bull, and why this argument is not only invalid but misleading and harmful to society. Lynn states that adoption agencies have tried to create different names to signify variating subgenres of the breed in hopes to get pit bulls adopted.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Faith and reason are thought to be foundations of defense for religious beliefs, having the same purpose many theologians and philosophers argue their relationship. Many believing that reason relies on faith while others think that just because you do not believe in one you are going to believe in the other, Karen Armstrong would agree since she suggests that they are not like political parties. Many theorists believe that reason is more on the logical side of the spectrum while faith is directed towards your beliefs and understandings of religious and theological claims. While scientists have argued they are not compatible because reason by itself gives us the answers to human life and faith is not a reliable source to provide us with those answers. Terry Eagleton suggests that they are one in the same and rely on each other.

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

Leslie Snyder builds an argument to persuade the audience that exposure to alcohol advertising increases alcohol consumption in youth by using evidence, such as facts or examples, to support her claims. Snyder proves that alcohol related advertising was due to the increase in drinking. Money spent on alcohol related advertising was also due to an increase in drinking. Snyder also explains when an under age drinker is exposed to high levels of alcohol advertisements the results are increased rather than decreased. Snyder uses these few examples to support her claim that the money spent on alcohol advertising and the exposure to alcohol advertising affects alcohol consumption by youth.

Read More
281 Words | 2 Pages

Anne Barnhill is an assistance professor in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy. Her work involves food ethics, food policy, public health ethics, the ethics of obesity prevention and healthy eating polices. She is part of a foundation called Greenwall fellowship of Bioethics and Health Policy ( Barnhill, A (2011)). This article was based on a distribute whether the state New York or any willing state to exclude sweetened beverage from the SNAP program.

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

In his book Nicomanchean Ethics Aristotle explains and differentiates voluntary and involuntary actions and expatiate on all the factor that contribute in deciding on the nature of our actions. The purpose of this differentiation is essential for the study of virtue ethics and more importantly for the study of jurisprudence “to the assigning of both of honors and of punishments” onto individuals. Aristotle firstly describes factors that causes actions to be involuntary or voluntary, such as ignorance, compulsion and choice. The understanding of such factors and their relation to our actions are also important to understand the principles explained by Aristotle. Voluntary actions is defined by Aristotle as actions that have their principle

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

The trickery, it laughs face spewing mockery, grinding your teeth you jolt the white sort into an inky black with your weapon, fiercely determined cinders rises up into the air, the eyes of fire at which had burned the smell of ashes. Since then, pen in hand, I face my next opponent the other side of the spectrum, forward more, I want to make them proud, there is no second best. Consisting of, ethics potent classifications within an individual, for this correlates particular affiliations in their motivations. Morals are these motivations, seeing that this is part of feasible implementation in internal development, for say an individual’s virtue of wisdom. By way of example, according to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, "when one holds oneself in a stable equilibrium of the soul, in order to choose the action knowingly and for its own sake.

Read More
1819 Words | 8 Pages

“Every skill and every inquiry, and similarly every action and rational choice, is thought to aim at some good; and so the good has been aptly described as that which everything aims. But it is clear that there is some difference between ends: some ends are activities, while others are products which are additional to the activities. In cases where there are ends additional to the actions, the products are by their nature better than activities.” (Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, as translated by Crisp, 2000, p. #3) Aristotle was the first philosopher who wrote a book on ethics titled, Nichomachean Ethics.

Read More
1322 Words | 6 Pages

PLS 325 Ancient Political Theory Dr. Shu-Shan Lee Sagynysh Yeltayeva December 11, 2015 Term Paper #2 Practical wisdom of hero and a villain: comparison of Forrest Gump from the film “Forrest Gump” and Hans Landa from the film “Inglorious basterds” Aristotle in his compilation of books “Ethics” described his perception of happiness, which lies in the exercise of the virtues. He describes rational and irrational part of the human soul. Irrational part consists of virtues of character, developed through habit. Rational one is further divided into invariable and variable parts.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

In todays world there is a distinct gap which separates virtue (ethics) from politics. For instance, the two distinct areas are not usually studied together, but are mostly separated from one another. This is far different than Aristotle’s approach in which he grouped both areas together because he felt that they are both practical sciences concerned with good action. Nicomachean Ethics is where his beliefs come to the forefront, with his connection of politics and virtue. He argues that all of the sciences are put to use in political science, which make it the master of promoting human good.

Read More

More about Martha Nussbaum's Argument Analysis

Open Document