Comparing Constitutions Of The Conservative Party And The New Democratic Party

1910 Words8 Pages

Comparing the constitutions of the Conservative Party and the New Democratic Party reveals significant ideological differences. The Conservative Party focuses on individual liberty and keeps an open mind while finding ways to promote liberal values. The New Democratic Party is committed to socialist values as it favours greater equality, shared wealth, and sustainable development. The two claims reveal the underlying values and ideas that help shape Canada's future. Their first claim mentions the dedication to change and fix social justice and equity by emphasizing increased equality, fairness, and opportunities. The NDP has demonstrated its commitment to social justice and equity by emphasizing sustainable prosperity. They are committed to …show more content…

This captures the difficulty of human nature, which includes both positive and negative tendencies toward individual rights and liberties. These are said to be fundamental to human nature and moral rights and must be preserved accordingly. Creating a society that values freedom of expression, individual liberty, and rights is critical, as it recognizes the difficulties of human behaviour. Achieving this balance creates a more equitable society that recognizes the issues within different types of human behaviour. The second constitutional claim is “2.1.2 The goal of building a national coalition of people who share these beliefs and who reflect the regional, cultural, and socio-economic diversity of Canada.” This is a choice by the government to help bring individuals together who may share similar beliefs or values in their society. Ensuring that this alliance within society reflects the wide range of backgrounds, cultural identities, and socioeconomic circumstances. In other words, the Conservative Party's purpose is to form a group of Canadians in different cities while simultaneously uniting people who have the same common