Comparing Dr. Jekyll And Mr. Hyde

475 Words2 Pages

The story has been adapted into various film versions over the years, but one of the most famous adaptations is the 1931 movie starring Fredric March as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. In this film adaptation, the story is changed in several ways, while still retaining the novel's central themes. One of the most significant differences between the novel and the film is the portrayal of Mr. Hyde. In the novel, Hyde is described as a small, deformed man, while in the film, he is depicted as a handsome and charismatic man, with dramatic makeup to show his sinister side. Another significant difference between the novel and the film is the portrayal of the relationship between Jekyll and Hyde. In the novel, Jekyll and Hyde are portrayed as separate entities, …show more content…

The novel tells the story of Dr. Henry Jekyll, a respected and successful physician who conducts experiments to separate his good and evil selves. However, the experiment goes wrong, and Jekyll transforms into the monstrous Mr. Hyde, unleashing his dark side and committing terrible crimes. This change in the portrayal of Hyde is significant, as it shifts the focus of the story from the physical transformation of Jekyll to the psychological transformation of his character. The film version of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a faithful adaptation of the novel, keeping many of the same characters, themes, and plot elements. Some of the biggest differences between the novel and the film version are the amount of detail and exposition, as the film does not go into as much depth as the novel does. However, the film does a great job of bringing the story to life with its visuals and atmosphere, which helps to bring out the horror of the story. The film does add a few elements that were not in the novel, such as the transformation of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde being a chemical-based transformation, as opposed to the novel which had it be an inner