Comparing Freakonomics By Steven D. Levitt And Stephen J.

542 Words3 Pages

The book Freakonomics by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner is a unique book because it makes the reader think about our society in a peculiar way. The book take uncommon topics or two opposites ideas and compares the two together to show how similar they are. For example, the two authors compare the Klu Klux Klan to a group of real estate agents, which is interesting because the direct relationship might not be easily apparent, but however they are fairly similar.
Freakonomics by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, answer questions one may have never thought about or would have never come across, and answer them in a way that is applicable into the real world. Such questions in the book include things such as: What do School Teachers and Sumo Wrestlers Have in Common, How is the Klu Klux Klan like a Group of Real-Estate Agents, and How to be the Perfect Parent….etc. As you can see some of the titles do not look …show more content…

For example, a Klu Klux Klan leader can be compared to a group of real-estate agents in the way that they both can be deceitful. “The gulf between the information we publicly proclaim and the information we know to be true often than vast. (Or, put a more familiar way: we say one thing and do another)( Levitt and Dubner 83).” The quote explains that people may say one thing, but actually know another. The way that real-estate agents could possibly be compared to a KKK leader is that they both are deceitful when it comes to information. For example, a real-estate agent may promise to sell your new york city apartment for 3 million dollars when in reality they can only sell it for 2.6 million dollars. As well as a KKK leader may promise the donations going towards the cult are going to be used for a violent acts of crime, but in reality the money will be used for his gambling purposes (David Duke the leader of the KKK actually did