ipl-logo

Comparing Language In 1984, Born A Crime, And Julius Caesar

773 Words4 Pages

Comparative Essay: The Power of Language in 1984, Born a Crime, and Julius Caesar Language is a profound and influential tool that shapes perceptions and controls thought in many literary works. It can influence emotions, dictate actions, and consolidate power. In George Orwell's 1984, Trevor Noah's Born a Crime, and William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, language is a powerful tool that authorities and people of greater power use to control thoughts, manipulate perceptions, and influence behaviour. This demonstrates that language is the most crucial medium for leaders to wield power. Controlling Thoughts: In George Orwell's 1984, the Party uses language to control thought and limit free expression. The creation of Newspeak is designed "to make …show more content…

He recounts how his prayers in English were believed to be more effective: "Which made my prayers the best prayers because English prayers get answered first[...] my grandmother would say, 'That prayer is going to get answered. I can feel it" (Noah 40). This belief in the superiority of English prayers shows how language shaped the perception of worth and power, reflecting broader societal hierarchies. In Julius Caesar, Antony's speech manipulates the crowd's perception of Brutus and the other conspirators. He describes Caesar's wounds with emotional imagery: "This was the most unkindest cut of all; For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors' arms, quite vanquished him: then burst his mighty heart" (3.2, 183-186). Antony's rhetoric turns public opinion against the conspirators, demonstrating the power of language to shape perception and incite action. Influencing Behavior: The ability of language to influence behavior is a key theme in these works. In 1984, the Party's control over language extends to controlling behavior. By limiting the words available to express dissent, the Party makes rebellion nearly

Show More
Related
911 Words | 4 Pages

(III.ii.140-146). Antony begins by establishing a link between the people of Rome, thus, leveling himself with the crowd and calming them down. He then insists that the crowd does not want to hear Caesar’s final thoughts, knowing the crowd will beg for it, stirring up and flustering them up, which grasps their attention through the use of verbal irony and diction. Moreover, through the usage of word “inflame,” Antony adequately flusters the crowd Furthermore, Antony utters, “And men have lost their reason. Bear with me; / My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, /

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” (George Orwell, 1984). William Shakespeare intensified his quality of work by insinuating manipulative and persuasive language within his writing. Cassius, a loyal server to Brutus, was easy to coax Brutus into rebelling against Julius Caesar, gaining an additional member to his group of conspirators. Cassius altered Brutus’ thoughts of Caesar’s ruling, within the use of multiple effective rhetorical techniques.

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

Mark Antony's speech on the death of Julius Caesar is a great piece of sympathy that serves as a very important moment in William Shakespeare's play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. " Delivered with great power and manipulation, Antony's speech showcases his strengths in delivering speeches. This essay will analyze the key rhetorical devices used by Mark Antony, examining their strategic intent and their impact on the audience's perception and emotions. The first thing we will be talking about is ethos.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

He then came back and shook the conspirators’ bloody hands, he begged to speak at Julius’ funeral, and Brutus allowed him, as long as he did not speak badly of the conspirators. When doing his speech, he used rhetorical devices like repetition and sarcasm when he kept repeating that Brutus was an honorable man and using it in a sarcastic tone. He used pathos by playing with the audience's emotion when showing the cloak and Caesar's body, it made the audience emotional. Brutus' speech convinced the people that his reasoning was enough to kill his friend and they even wanted him to be the new Caesar. Antony's speech convinced the people to turn against the conspirators, kill a poet with the name Cinna, and start a riot.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

Mark Antony, as noble as a bald eagle in the eyes of Rome, was one of the most intelligent, trustworthy, and popular people of his time. After Caesar’s murder, Antony gains the trust of the conspirators to speak to the citizens at Caesar’s funeral. He uses his speech to indirectly turn the people of Rome against the conspirators. Antony was one of many to give a long speech within the story, but what stands out in his speeches is the ability to move a whole population’s tendencies and beliefs to side with himself using the power of rhetoric. Although Antony’s speech may be seen as him just feeding the people’s ears with words they want to hear, the well structured devices used enable the listeners to fill their own ears with their second guessing thoughts.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

Carl Sagan once said, “If you make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe (2).” This can be seen in all aspects in life, like literature. If you want to create a book you must first create the universe, then the trees, then the machines to make the paper, and the printer to print it, and so on. In The Sun is Also a Star, Yoon shows that the main characters are guided by fate when Daniel and Natasha first meet, when they mysteriously got to spend more time together, and how they are a perfect match. Throughout the novel, everything is controlled by fate.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

The commoners begin to sympathize with Antony during his dramatic pause. To compound upon their pity, Antony graphically describes the stabbings the conspirators inflicted upon Caesar. While the Romans are gathered around Caesar’s body, Antony uses dramatic irony, “This was the most unkindest cut of all;/ For when the noble Caesar saw him stab,/ Ingratitude, more strong than the traitors’ arms,/ Quite vanquished him. Then burst his mighty heart;” (3.2. 183-186). Antony’s rage against the conspirators incites anger and grief within the mourning crowd.

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

He presents Caesar not as an ambitious tyrant, but as a compassionate leader who cares for his people. Antony tell’s Caesar’s refusal of the crown thrice and shows his will, which leaves money to the citizens of Rome. These things tranquilize Caesar and paint him as a good person of Rome. In conclusion, while Brutus’s speech is more to reason and noble duty, Antony’s speech goes through its masterful use of emotional appeal, repetition, and rhetorical devices of questioning.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

However, later on, Antony intentionally tells the mob that “hearing the will of Caesar...will inflame you/…” and that it is good that “you know not that you are his heirs/…” (III, ii, 145-148). By purposely saying the context of the will, Antony is able to manipulate the crowd to riot against the conspirators and seek revenge for Caesar by appealing to the emotional feeling of anger. By appealing to feelings such as guilt, sympathy, and anger, Antony uses pathos to manipulate the crowd to his

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

William Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, uses the rhetorical devices of a rhetorical question, repetition of the word “ambitious,” and a direct reference in Antony 's speech to persuade the plebeians to rebel against the conspirators. Antony allures to the pathos, ethos, and logos of the audience to get them to exile the conspirators. Shakespeare uses a rhetorical question in Antony’s speech to get the plebeians to notice the wrongdoings of the conspirators and excite them to revolt. Antony discusses the economic dominance and vigor that Caesar brought to Rome, and with sarcasm he states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2.99).

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

William Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, uses the rhetorical devices of a rhetorical question, repetition of the word ambitious, and direct reference in Antony 's speech to instigate the plebeians and persuade them to rebel against the conspirators. Antony pulls on the pathos, ethos, and logos of the audience to get them to exile the conspirators. Shakespeare uses a rhetorical question in Antony’s speech to get the plebeians to notice the wrongdoings of the conspirators and excite them to rebel. Antony discusses the money that Caesar left to the countrymen, and with sarcasm he states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2.99).

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar Essay Words are more powerful than weapons. Throughout the play of Julius Caesar the idea of powerful words is a key theme. Through speeches lies and cunning plans the characters in this play are able to convince people to join conspiracies and move people to action. This play reflects on the need for excellent speaking skills and its importance in ancient Rome, Elizabethan, and modern times.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

By limiting the vocabulary, Newspeak is essentially “unintelligible” and hence controls the people’s understanding of the real world. Orwell emphasises that language is of utmost importance as it structures and limits the ideas individuals are capable of formulating and expressing. In 1984, language is used as a ‘mind control tool’. The party slogan, “war is peace, freedom is

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

Language and thought were always seen as two different processes, where thought was always taken as the main process. Language was just seen as means of communication, a process of expressing our thoughts to other people, and so, a thought came first, which means that language was developed as that thought was put to words. But then, we later realized that the way a person speaks affects the way they think, and that people of different languages think in different ways. That is why in George Orwell’s 1984, the INGSOC Party used language to manipulate and eradicate personal thought for political purposes; they developed a new language called Newspeak, with the intention and aim of obtaining total control and make any other thought impossible. The Party’s replacement of Oldspeak by Newspeask made many thought words impossible and was therefore used as a mechanism of control.

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

In Orwell's opinion, the destruction of Language is used to dumb down the people and control the minds of the masses. This ideology is exhibited in the fictional language of Newspeak, the language created by Orwell in the book 1984. The purpose of Newspeak is to lessen the knowledge of the people under the Party and eventually make thought crime impossible. An example of this is in the

Read More

More about Comparing Language In 1984, Born A Crime, And Julius Caesar

Open Document