Comparing MLK And Malcolm X

460 Words2 Pages

Carolyn Ortiz, Mr. Dimich Period 4 May 16, 2024 MlK and Malcolm X Essay. This essay discusses whose philosophy made the most sense for civil rights in the 1960s. In my opinion, Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both aimed to achieve equality and justice for African Americans, their philosophies and approaches were different on how to achieve social change. Martin Luther King Jr. “I have a dream speech” about civil and economic rights and an end to racism in the United States. His philosophy of life is based on Martin Luther King Jr. teaching the power of love, nonviolence, equality, and justice to achieve social change. His speech was inspired by Christian beliefs. On the other hand, Malcolm X was emphasizing self-defense and gaining more power with the black community. In my opinion, I think Martin Luther King Jr. philosophy made the most sense for civil rights in the 1960s because Martin Luther King Jr. believed in the transformative potential of nonviolent resistance to confront injustice and racism. His inspiration came from Mahatma Gandhi’s principles of nonviolent protest. Martin Luther King philosophy aimed not only at achieving legal equality but also at fostering reconciliation and …show more content…

His philosophy was oppression by any means necessary. He rejected the notion of passive acceptance of injustice. This speech was to separate institutions and communities where African Americans could thrive independently from white people. I personally don’t agree with Malcolm X. I disliked his speech, he said. No matter what color you are white or black, everyone should have their equal rights and everyone should be together as a community. Nor should black or white have power over each other. It should be equal to. His speech didn’t make that much sense; he just wanted the African Americans to empower themselves, which isn’t right. We all live in the same world and should be treated