I liked the movie better than the book. Reason being is because it was easier to feel the mood in the movie. It was harder to understand the mood in the book than it was in the
The general plot was of course the same, but there was also how Montag’s opinion of the society changed over the course of the movie. Clarisse’s character was majorly changed throughout the movie compared to the book. This was because she never died in the movie when “"No. The same girl.
Comparing the movie to the book, the reader realizes that many scenes were added to the television episode. Although the book and movie were alike in some ways, the book was less complicated and easier to understand. In my opinion, the movie differences were most likely due to the adaptation of the story to television. Ray Bradbury Published and presented an intriguing
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
Most movies and books have significant differences, but that is not the case with Of Mice and Men. The film depicted every aspect of the novel almost perfectly. Although the film brought the words in the novel to life, it also brought on a different opinion of some of the characters. My opinion of George Milton changed after I watched the movie because the novel expressed how George was always trying to protect and care for Lennie. The movie showed George caring for Lennie
I believe that the reason the film version is so different from the novel version is because the producer did not envision it adapting well to screen play very well. Also if every detail in the book was put into the movie, it would be over 4 hours long to really capture it all. The producers knew they needed to keep their viewers attention somehow and playing a 4 hour movie with many lulls in it would have been a disaster. Instead they decided to take the biggest points in the book and place them back to back in order to keep the audience 's attention. There were many differences in the film from the book but three of the biggest ones are Cheswick’s death, the nurse with an imperfection and the point of view the movie was shot in compared to the book.
In addition to that, the main characters themselves show differences in their way of acting. For example, Chief Bromden appears in the book to be someone quite clever despite his mental illness. He fakes being deaf to spy on others and his thoughts are logical most of the time. In the movie, he just looks like a fool who doesn’t know what is going on half of the time. The only words he can say are “juicy fruit”, whilst in the book he speaks normally towards the end of the story.
Yet the distinct differences between them also affect the plots to an extent to which the suspense in the movie is less compared to the novel. Although the differences greatly alter the two, it makes each of them unique and exclusive from each other. Despite these differences, there is one theme that links both the novel and the movie together: that people with different personalities, interests, and appearances are also the same to each other. The book shows more examples of this theme than the movie, making the novel more understanding to other individuals than the film itself. Because of this, we would recommend the book and film to those who experience a likeliness to the conflicts in each storyline, such as a fight between two different social
There are details left out of the movie that were in the book, the movie doesn 't demonstrate the ongoing theme of hunger as well as the book does, and the the movie does a better job with
In The Great Gatsby movie, Daisy, for example mostly spoke sweetly throughout the whole movie. In the book, her voice was described as ringing like money. Instead, in the movie she appeared to be an innocent person but was actually extraordinary selfish in her own actions. In the movie, Jay Gatsby had a violent, dramatic outburst at the Plaza Hotel when he was provoked by Tom Buchanan. Another difference would be that Jordan Baker and Nick Carraway did NOT have a loving relationship like in the book; they didn’t communicate in the movie as much as they did in the movie.
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.
The most shocking change, though, was that Jonas and Fiona actually fell in love. In the book, they were twelve but in the movie, they are a lot older and like each other. First Jonas knows he likes Fiona, then he tells her to stop taking her injections, next the fall in love! The only thing that really happened in the book was that Jonas knew he liked Fiona. It didn’t really get farther than
Another difference would be the way the short stories were ordered. In the book, the stories were told in no perceptible order, making it hard to remember who is whose daughter/mother etc. The movie begins with a party which all the characters attend, and the stories are disclosed as the character is thinking about it. The mother and daughter’s stories are staged after one another. The movie allows for a more natural way of telling the story, and makes it easier to remember the characters and associate mothers with daughters.
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
I liked the movie better than the book. One of my reasons is because, I like looking at all the images. My second reason is because, I like hearing the actual voices of the people. My other reason is because, I think the movie had more details. I also like the movie better because, I think is more interesting.
