ipl-logo

Comparing Philosophies Of Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Jr.

622 Words3 Pages

“You can murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder murder.” says a bright mind known as Martin Luther King Jr. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. were both victims of racism, violence, and social prejudice. Both wise men had philosophies that they lived by and preached with all their hearts. What philosophy between the two men was best during the 1960s? Martin Luther King Jr.’s outlook advocated that blacks had no alternative to non-violence. On the other hand Malcolm X’s was that anything was necessary to protect yourself from racism by any means needed, even if that includes violent actions. I stand by Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy. A philosophy is a particular thought and belief on a problem. His outlook focuses on nonviolence, he is an integrationist, and thrives on determination. …show more content…

(F)“Basic to the philosophy of nonviolence is the refusal to cooperate with evil.” By not complying with you are disobeying, but not bringing an further harm upon anyone. (H)“Do to us what you will and we will still love you.” Kindness will spread kindness, kindness will not spread violence. (J)“This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe.” This explains that violence will only lead to more violence and a greater death toll. (L)“The american Negro has no alternative nonviolence.” If blacks in America were to act upon violence it would lead no abundant amounts of violence from the whites. Blacks would be sorely outnumbered. By demonstrating nonviolence you are showing love and kindness as a defense to

Show More
Related
360 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther King philosophy was the best for America in the 1960s. In the 1960s there was a great civil rights. Two leaders emerge, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Both man wanted the same thing, however they had different approaches to reach their goals. In this paper, I’m going to show that Martin Luther King philosophy was better in the 1960s because his power on nonviolence, his strong leadership and fight for equal rights.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

Though there was two, Martin Luther King Jr’s philosophy made the most sense for america during the 1960s because of their views on three topics. Violence, integration and the economy. Both leaders had there own personal views on violence but Martin Luther King Jr’s had the most peaceful and logical views to be used. Malcolm X views of violence were a bit more aggressive.

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

Martin Luther King’s philosophy was the best for the 1960s American by his idea of integration, economic standpoint, and Nonviolent Civil Disobedience. Martin Luther King’s philosophy of integrating everyone in daily life was best to achieve equality. “…not be judged by the

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that MLK had the better philosophy because he understood that while violence may stop the racists for the time being, it will never end racism for good. He believes that violence may kill the person who is committing the crimes, but it won’t stop the crimes from being committed by someone else. In document J, MLK says, “Violence may murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder the murder.” In document F, MLK says,”Basic

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

Did Martin Luther King Jr have a better philosophy than Malcolm X? Martin Luther King Jr was born on January 15, 1929, in Atlanta Gorgia, he passed an entrance exam to Morehouse University at the age of 15 and studied the beliefs and non-violent tactics of Mahatma Ghandhi. Was Martin Luther King Jr’s Philosophy more effective than Malcolm X’s philosophy? Martin Luther King Jr had the better philosophy because of his economic strategy to slowly achieve racial equality, his ideas on why people should take a non-violent stance as a method of protest, and his drive and dream of better more equal society and education.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

MLK’s “I have a dream” speech promoted the idea of integration. He believed that the races were created equal and that blacks should be respected as American citizens. Malcolm X followed Muslim principles and believed that he would protest “by any means necessary.” He would do whatever needed in order to obtain freedom for African-Americans whether it be violence or nonviolent. Malcolm opposed integration and believed that blacks needed to fend for themselves in the fight against whites.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

Ambrose Bierce’s “The Boarded Window” uses rhetorical devices such as irony and foreshadowing to develop the themes of death and failure in the story, advertently relating the narrative to events from his past. “The Boarded Window” follows the tale told by an unnamed narrator about the mysterious character of Murlock, a man in his 50’s who was recently found dead in his cabin in the woods just outside of Cincinnati; in his home they find a mysteriously boarded window. In a brief summary, the narrator explains that the window was boarded up soon after a young Murlock’s wife died, it’s revealed that when she fell ill, his lack of medical knowledge and recurring failure while treating her only prolonged her suffering. “The Boarded Window” has

Read More
1168 Words | 5 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. believed that change would come slowly with peaceful protest and resistance while Malcolm X believed that African Americans should take care of themselves and attack whites when they were attacked. Many believe that Malcolm X’s philosophy

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King's philosophy made the most sense for America in the 1960s. When King talks about blacks and whites, he wants them to be racially inclined, Malcolm X hoped for the opposite. Martin Luther King yearned for the exact circumstance for each person, while Malcolm X expected everyone to be separate, but still have the same rights. Martin Luther King’s views made the most sense, but Malcolm X’s views on certain things seemed more right than Kings. Martin Luther King aspired for everyone to be united.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

During the 1960’s, Martin Luther King Jr. had the best philosophy compared to his counterpart, Malcolm X. They both have different methods of solving racism and having civil rights for black Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to solve racism and to have civil rights peacefully and nonviolently. Malcolm X on the other hand, wanted to solve racism and to have civil rights by any means necessary.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for

Read More
364 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther King’s philosophy made the most sense for America in the 1960’s. Raised in the middle class. His father had been one of the most important ministers in the south. At six years of age Martin had experienced his first encounter of racism when the parents of a white kid said Martin couldn’t play with their kid because of him being different in skin color. This first example is about how using violence would cause a bigger problem and increase violence.

Read More
1974 Words | 8 Pages

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout his speeches, he spoke about the importance of violence and how it was often necessary to endure such harm, once stating, “Power real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action” (www.biography.com). Although these two men differed in their thought on violence, they often agreed on how important their fights were. Without Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, Civil Rights would have been nonexistent,

Read More

More about Comparing Philosophies Of Malcolm X And Martin Luther King Jr.

Related Topics

Open Document