Comparing The Crucible And The Lottery

622 Words3 Pages

As a coherent set of views manifested through interpersonal interaction, political ideologies become a significant aspect of the human experience which is susceptible to manipulation and interpretation. The ramifications of political and moral issues of Arthur Miller’s milieu are encapsulated in his1953 play The Crucible, an allegory of the Salem witchcraft trials influenced by his personal context of the McCarthy Era. The political representation in The Crucible aligns with Shirley Jackson’s 1948 short story The Lottery, a powerful allegory of barbarism and social sacrifice. Both texts exhibit the behavioural patterns of individuals as a result of traditional, religious and patriotic values. Therefore, the composer’s political motivation is purposefully addressed through representation and it’s medium of production. Unfaltering conflict between authority and personal conscience is embodied within the play most prevalent in Miller’s characterisation of Deputy-Governor Danforth. Danforth is a figure of jurisdiction representative as the …show more content…

The theocracy in Salem was essential to a Puritan society where everything was subject to spiritual scrutiny and enabled individuals like Parris to assume power over the village. This entitlement also allowed for greater consolidation of power through persecutions and trials where the defendants were often guilty until proven innocent. Like most Puritans, Danforth remains convinced of the reality of witchcraft testified by Abigail in Act Three, an act integrated with immense dramatic irony. Despite the persuasion of Hale who once held substantial power over the town with as the Puritan pastor of Beverly, Danforth is quick to imprison and condemn a suspect to death demonstrating the powerplay in Salem as orchestrated by Abigail and the girls