ipl-logo

Comparing The Qualities Of The Prince And Letter From Birmingham Jail

910 Words4 Pages

President Obama echo a leadership of both Niccolo Machiavelli "The Qualities of the Prince" and Martin Luther King Jr. "Letter from Birmingham Jail". Machiavelli point of view to become a successful prince was that you must lead your people. He talks about how a prince should appear to his people for authority. There are different types of principles such as war and is it better to be loved or feared. He also emphasizes the importance’s that a prince must maintain his power. He said that war, A prince, therefore, must not have any other object nor any other thought, nor must he take anything as his profession but war, it's institutions, and it's discipline; because that is the only profession which befits one who commands; and it is of importance …show more content…

He talking about is it better to be loved or feared. He concluded that it can be considered both and but you can have one quality. Also, you should be feared by the people but your people shouldn't hate you in the process. He states, Therefore, a prince must not worry about the reproach of cruelty when it is a matter of keeping his subjects united and loyal; for with a very few examples of cruelty he will be more compassionate than those who, out of excessive mercy, permit disorders to continue, from which arise murders and plundering; for these usually harm the community at large, while the executions that come from the prince harm one individual in particular" (227). When president Obama made a speech at West Point talking about America was force to fight war in Afghanistan. As he spoke, it felt like he was speaking through Machiavelli point of view. He spoke about maintaining power which Machiavelli emphasizes on. President Obama strategies were for his people to fear him but not to be hated. He had changed something in the mission, I which he sent more troops to Afghanistan to try to keep peace. For Machiavelli point of view was good and bad quality which was good or bad in some cases. Obama delivering his speech manage to be feared but not hated by keeping his good guy image. One must considered Obama a prince like

Show More
Related
372 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr and Queen Elizabeth I were both influential leaders who have impacted life in their respective countries. King, in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” defended the strategy of nonviolence resistance to racism whereas Queen Elizabeth I, in her speech delivered at Tilbury, rallied her troops for an expected invasion by the Spanish Armada. Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” and Queen Elizabeth’s speech in 1588 both use juxtaposition to fulfill different purposes by placing two ideas closely together to emphasize contrasts. Martin Luther King Jr uses juxtaposing metaphors to contrast present racial prejudice to a hope for future unity.

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

Machiavelli's logic is fundamentally to end up a decent pioneer you should do anything even it is corrupt and off-base. He first composes that a ruler's obligation concerning military matter should dependably consider war just, even in times of peace. They should know their surroundings precisely so they can safeguard and make compelling methodologies to counter the adversary's assault. They should likewise know verifiable fights so they will have the capacity to take in their strategies and enhance it. He then discusses the sovereign's way; ought to the ruler be liberal or a recluse.

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

The biggest issue is that The Prince is outdated. This clearly shows when he spends a large portion of the book discussing different principalities. Unfortunately, out of the five he discussed: hereditary, new, mixed, civic, and ecclesiastical only one is partially relevant. A Civic principality is a new state, where the leader is chosen by the people; similarly most modern leaders are chosen either by the collective whole of their population, or by qualified few.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

People could not speak up or challenge what the Prince had to say. However, in today’s society approval from the people is much more important for a leader. Word gets around fast through innovations in communication, and dissatisfied people are more able to organize and rise up against leaders. For this reason, leaders should be more concerned with being loved by their people than being

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

Machiavelli's book XV teaches us how a ruler should conduct himself with his subjects and friends. In the mind of this author, he devised to create a more realistic leader than idealist when he pointed out that. "For Many authors have constructed imaginary republics and principalities that have never existed in practice and never could; for the gap between how people actually behave and how they ought to behave is so great that anyone who ignores everyday reality in order to live up an ideal will soon discover he has been taught how to destroy himself, not how to preserve himself. ”(Morgan P.508). Machiavelli recommends to the ruler how to stay in power, and to achieve this goal must develop virtues of nobility and evil if necessary, and should

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

He states this in chapter 18; “... if a prince succeeds in conquering and holding this state. His means are always judged honorable and everywhere praised…” From a moral standpoint, this argument is wrong because it completely ignores the possible side effects and outcomes of not caring about how something is achieved, just as long as it is achieved. It also goes against logic to say this, because how can the court of humanity be so simple as to let something slide just because it brought something good? Humanity does not like liars and deceivers, especially in these modern times when information is so easy to obtain.

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

Betraying your country can result in the death penalty and most people fear death. If one shows love, it may show favoritism and to show that means that there would be envious people and some would hate the ruler. It might be a good idea for outside countries to fear ones country because that could mean peace for them, after all you can’t force a country to be allies with you. He didn’t want to be hated and he didn’t want to be loved. This is where more contradictions took place making it seem almost impossible to follow his

Read More
1416 Words | 6 Pages

How Princes Should Act Chapters 16 to 23 of The Prince are concerned with answering a number of questions a ruler may have when conducting the affairs of state and since a ruler acts out of necessity for the state, the advice given reveals what Machiavelli believes about the state (Nederman (2014), chapter 2). Machiavelli regularly employs historical examples or analogies in order to explain the political utility of decisions made by rulers and is much less concerned with the perception of a ruler by the subjects. Since the perception of the ruler is of little concern, legacy should not be a concern for a ruler because the only legacy worth remembering is the continued success of the state. This is however not usually the case because the masses are more likely to remember a person for their vices; Adolf Hitler and Germany comes to mind as an example where the state grew stronger but the leader is remembered as indisputably evil.

Read More
379 Words | 2 Pages

While on the other side of the spectrum he says a Prince must become a civilian in order to understand his people. He writes in such a way that makes one believe he is trying to teach this notion to his readers that lye in the high standings of society. Ultimately to understand the

Read More
187 Words | 1 Pages

1. Yes, I personally think Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince continue to influence today's political leaders such as Barrack Obama. He had given new laws during his presidency the most popular one is the same-sex marriage.

Read More
1652 Words | 7 Pages

In chapters six and seven of his book, “The Prince”, Niccolo Machiavelli stated that the difficulty in keeping and maintaining new principalities depends on how the prince acquired them. The principalities can be acquired either by one’s own arms and abilities or by the arms of others and by relying on luck or good fortune. Although the two options will both mitigate different problems and issues, Machiavelli argues that those who rely least on good fortune will come out the strongest. In this chapter, the dependent variable would be the difficulty a prince would experience in acquiring a principality. The independent variable then will be the method in acquiring the principality, whether through ability or good fortune.

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Machiavelli believed that men will follow a ruler as long as the ruler serves their interests, and a quick to turn against the ruler unless they fear great punishment. Machiavelli would say that it is best to be feared rather than loved as long as the fear does not cause hate, which he believed to be perfectly possible.

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

According to Machiavelli, a successful leader should to exhibit a certain character which is key to their success. He highlights five key qualities that a leader should possess A leader should be feared by the people. According to Machiavelli, it is better to be feared than loved. He believed that the people were less likely to revolt if they feared the leader

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

According to Machiavelli, ideal prince is a risk-taker who puts a military on action, as the people respect the warrior. An ideal prince thinks for himself rather than relying on others, knows how to read characters, and does not surround himself with flatterers. He lives in reality, not fantasy. He works hard, utilizes his own mind, and makes survival of his guide. The ideal leader is neither loved nor hated, but respected.

Read More

More about Comparing The Qualities Of The Prince And Letter From Birmingham Jail

Related Topics

Open Document