Comparing Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead

936 Words4 Pages

Existentialism is a philosophy that really focuses on free will of an individual and the meaning of life. There have been many existentialists to write pieces demonstrating this philosophy. Tom Stoppard wrote an existentialist play called Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. This play builds off of characters from the famous Shakespeare play, Hamlet. Stoppard's play is existentialist because it demonstrates its characters having free will, no real certainty and they toss around the idea of death and what it means to die.
One common existentialist belief is that certain questions are unavoidable. One question that seems to be unavoidable for Rosencrantz and Guildenstern is the question of death. In the third act of Stoppard's play, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern roll around the idea of death, and what it means to …show more content…

The player in this play, tries to somewhat comfort Rosencrantz and Guildenstern by saying "In our experience, most things end in death." (123) Guildenstern responds to that with fear and vengeance. He says, "I'm talking about death-and you've never experienced that. And you cannot act it. You die a thousand casual deaths-with none of that intensity which squeezes out life... and no blood runs cold anywhere. Because even as you die you know that you will come back in a different hat. But no one gets up after death-there is no applause- there is only silence and some second-hand clothes, and that’s--death----" (123) The player is an actor, who dies all the time in his plays and has yet to think about the effects of real death. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy also says, "..to cease to be alive is to die. So there are no deathless exits after all." Meaning, death is unavoidable. That is what Rosencrantz and