Comparison Between T-Mobile And AT & T Merger

625 Words3 Pages

Business merge when after a proper research has been done to ascertain that the combination of the company is likely to make a positive impact on them. The anticipation of T- mobile and T & TT is at halt because the two businesses are not on the same level. The anti-trust guidelines also indicate that the firms are not likely to benefit the consumer but themselves while not minding the burden they will impose on the customer for lack of adequate choices. The Anti-trust guideline rule will apply to AT&T merger with T-Mobile if the only the two-company’s merger will lessen the competition and their competition effects on the present as well as the future of the business. The rule would be applicable when the two firms in their public disclosures fail to overcome the presumption (Samuelson & Marks, 2015). The law will be applicable after the critical analysis of the two firms to ensure that transaction is not likely to cause any increased purchase cost on the consumer side. …show more content…

Mergers as the case with T-Mobile and AT&T would make it the two-business become useful in managing their price regulations and efficiency gains. The rule will apply to make the two firms merge if the HHI lies between 1,500 and 2,500. The merger between T-Mobile and TracFone will bar the merger as the concentrated market of the as a result of the two can hardly surpass the 100 standard points. The merger will affect the market concentration as the products will be reduced under one major brand leaving the consumer with limited choice therefore the ratio of market concentration would