Comparison Between The Danish Resistance Movement And Women Of Liberia

Many peace movements are based on the idea of liberation. In particular, the Civil Rights Movement, Danish Resistance Movement and Women of Liberia all focused on the liberation of individuals under oppressive regimes or structures. Each movement utilized strategies based on the concept of non-violence. However, each of these movements used different methods to achieve their goals and some went beyond Gandhi’s interpretation of non-violence. To start, the civil rights movement was focused on ending segregation in the United States and ending racial inequality, leading to the liberation of African American people. This movement was rooted in an anti-racism ideology. Furthermore, the movement was heavily committed to nonviolence. Martin Luther King Jr, who

Additionally, they were anti-war and fought to ensure peace between factions. This movement used similar public activism techniques to the civil rights movement and the Danish liberation movement. However, this movement went beyond those techniques to achieve their goals. For example, women used sexuality to threaten the men in charge, including threatening a sex strike if the violence did not end. Additionally, the women of the movement communicated directly with leaders demanding a negotiation to end the violence. This is different from the previous movements as the protesters and resistors fought directly against the oppressive regimes without prioritizing direct negotiations. In the case of the Danish resistors, it was dangerous to try and engage with the Nazi regime and much of the protest had to be done in secret. Following their action, Liberia’s leader was held accountable for his corruption. The movement is transformed to prioritize restoring peace in Liberia and reintegrating child soldiers back into society. To summarize, each of the civil rights, Danish resistance and Women of Liberia movements aimed to end oppression against a group of