ipl-logo

Comparison Of Nicola Sacco And Bartolomeo Vanzetti

900 Words4 Pages

Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were two Italian immigrants who became the center of attention for one of the most disputed cases in American History. The duration of the prosecution of Sacco and Vanzetti was constructed under the Public and Political opinions of the early 1920’s, as well as many aspects of the American society and its judicial system. These factors made a crucial impact on the conviction of the two men. After World War I, during the 1920s, American nativism and racial discrimination were widespread. Guilt or innocence was of no concern for the prosecutors, because they believed that both Sacco and Vanzetti should be put to the electric chair. As self-proclaimed anarchists, Sacco and Vanzetti opposed the “American way …show more content…

Katzman brought forth multiple eye witnesses to place Sacco and Vanzetti at the scene of the crime. The evidence offered by the Commonwealth was not the same against both defendants, and the theory of the prosecution was that Sacco did the actual shooting while Vanzetti sat in the car as one of the collaborators in a conspiracy to murder (The Atlantic). While prosecution witnesses identified Sacco as one of the two gunmen, no witness claimed to have seen Vanzetti during the actual shooting (S&vaccount). Amounting bodies of evidence seemed to indicate that the two men were innocent. Reasonable people came to suspect that those against radicals were conspiring to destroy two people who seemed as a threat to American social order (ATF 276). The truth of that statement was supported by an official of the Italian consulate in Boston who deposed that Sacco visited his consulate at an hour that made it impossible for him to have been one of the Braintree murder gang. The claim of Vanzetti, he was pursuing his trade as fish peddler was sustained by a number of witnesses who had been his customers that day (The Atlantic). In the Sacco and Vanzetti case, each of the identifying witnesses were speaking from observations of men they had never seen before, and men of a foreign race (The Atlantic). Racial prejudice is present here. Within the testimonies of these witnesses, they saw Italian immigrants. They believe …show more content…

I believe that the Sacco and Vanzetti case has remained a national story for so long because of evident racial injustice, and the effect of public opinion within our judicial system. The jury which convicted Sacco and Vanzetti, much like the trial of Andre Thomas, was an all white jury. The members of the jury, district attorney Frederick Katzman, and the judge Thayer intended for nothing besides putting both men to death, and only based their prosecution primarily on “consciousness of guilt”(ATF 262). The law attempts to limit the flow of evidence in a trial to what can be constructed as facts(ATF 264). However, in this instance, both men were denied the protection of the law and were prosecuted under their immigrant background and anarchistic beliefs. Prosecutors were more concerned with who the defendants were and what they believed than which they might have done (ATF

Show More
Related
556 Words | 3 Pages

Yet, the trial court denied the motions since those of Mexican descent were categorized as part of the class of whites or caucasians. Resulting in the court to deny these motions presented by the petitioners due to insufficient evidence of Mexican-Americans treated as a “special class” within this community. Due to the insufficient substantial evidence to prove otherwise against the accusations Hernandez was facing, he was then found guilty by an all-Anglo jury, for premeditated murder of Joe Espinosa and sentenced to life in prison.

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

In the introduction to The Great New York Conspiracy of 1741, the author, Peter Charles Hoffer, asks the reader to asks themselves if the government went too far in to analyzing a plot behind the commission of arson and burglary crimes by a coalition of slaves and white societal figures. He urged us to look deeper into the potentially doctored documentation of the conspiracy trials and play the devil's advocate against the court system. The trials centered around the arraignment of John Hughson, Margaret Kerry, Caesar, and Prince for the commission of arson and burglary, which constituted the destruction of warehouses and buildings in town. The idea of a possible conspiracy arose from the community that frequented Hughson's bar, many of whom

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

When we first learned about the death of a 22 year old Indigenous man, it was presented to us as a racial killing. However, as we acquired more knowledge about the case, it became clear that it was more complicated than we had initially thought. Without doing any personal research on the incident, it was easy to believe the hearsay that surrounded the case. Even though Gerald Stanley claimed self defense, Colten Boushie's death was unwarranted. Gerald was acquitted as a result of as you dive into the case, there is more than meets the eye, Gerald Stanley had a smart defense team, and society played a role in the ruling.

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

Nifong and the Duke Lacrosse case highlight several key institutional failures of the justice system in regards to prosecutorial discretion, prosecutor accountability, and the prosecutors dilemma. Prosecutors are considered by many to be the most powerful actors in the courtroom proceedings as they follow the case from the time of arrest to the sentencing. Prosecutors have a lot of discretion in the justice process as they are the ones who decide: Do I prosecute? Who do I prosecute?

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

Another layer of white supremacy was in the courts as Assata was being charged for bank robbery and kidnapping, which seem to be a stage theater to give the illusion of a fair trial when in fact it was just another tool to continue to subjugate African American. The bank robbery case was suspicious when the F.B.I. started to fingerprint and took photographs of Assata in the same clothing as the bank robbers and at the same angle. However, what got the case, postpone was the judge and his inability to contain his prejudice saying that he thought Assata was guilty and when the case resumed still were not able to get a conviction. The other case of the kidnapping of the drug dealer (James freeman), which quickly fell apart when Freeman testify and was asked if he was being coerce to frame Assata, he

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

The People against Robert Jefferson Burglary in the Third Degree, January 27, 1905 During the beginning of the twentieth century, Americans wanted change. The Progressive era was a time where people became more socially involved. Ending corruption in government was the most important part of the movement. Progressivism was an approach by the American people to reform local government, industry, churches and much more.

Read More
1167 Words | 5 Pages

The majority of people would never imagine they could be convicted of a crime which they did not commit, but all too often, this is the startling reality. Through the history of the United States and the world, excessively many decisions have been made rashly as a result of fear and bias. Two specific cases in the United States are those of the Red Scare and the West Memphis Three. While both situations did not lead to prosecution and conviction of individuals, both did involve harsh accusations which seemed reasonably based but may not have been. By comparing and contrasting these two events, one can see specific recurring patterns not only in the history of the United States, but in the history of the whole world; by seeing this, hopefully

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

O.J. Simpson: Cold Blooded Killer? The arrest and trial of Orenthal James Simpson is perhaps one of the most well-known cases in American history. It revealed a great schism between Americans that had been previously veiled by blissful ignorance. On the night of June 13, 1994, Simpson’s ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and a waiter, Ronald Goldman were found brutally stabbed to death outside of a Los Angeles condominium.

Read More
958 Words | 4 Pages

The Sacco-Vanzetti case of the 1920s is perhaps one of the most controversial trials in history. The amazingly tragic tale of two Italian immigrants shocked the entire world. The fluctuating evidence, heart-wrenching final statements, and global controversy surrounding the Sacco-Vanzetti verdict have all contributed to making this case so memorable. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti emigrated from Italy to the United States in 1908, where they met nine years later at a strike. On April 15, 1920, the Slater and Morrill Shoe Company, located in Braintree, Massachusetts, was robbed and two men were killed in the midst of the crime.

Read More
1698 Words | 7 Pages

Leo Frank was a white, Jewish, superintendent of a pencil factory in Atlanta, Georgia where the body of Mary Phagan, one of the factories’ workers, was found. The murder of the thirteen year old girl prompted outrage in the city of Atlanta and around the country, and in a highly controversial trail, Leo Frank was quickly given the death sentence. Frank’s sentence would later be changed to life in prison, but while he was in a jail hospital, a mob broke in and lynched Frank on the outskirts of Mary Phagan’s hometown. The trial of Leo Frank is unique in both its ability to spark controversy up to the present day, and its ability to highlight the social tensions of America and Atlanta, one of the countries busiest cities. With a new progressive

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

It’s the 1920’s and fear sweeps through the United States. When communists overthrew the Russian government in the 1917 Bolshevik Russian Revolution, the United States government resolved to prevent a similar uprising in America. American citizens also had a growing fear that the new communist ideals in Russia would spread to the United States, damaging the nation’s democracy. This fear of communism was known as “The Red Scare” or “The First Red Scare.”

Read More
1343 Words | 6 Pages

Coker gives great evidence that supports racial injustice in the criminal justice system. She discusses on the Supreme Court’s rulings and accusations of racial preference in the system. This article is helpful because it supports my thesis on race playing a role on the system of criminal justice. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes.

Read More
2350 Words | 10 Pages

Since the beginning of history, the death penalty has been utilized as a means of punishment for a crime. Capital punishment has taken on multiple forms and been used as punishment wide range of crimes; from stealing to murder. Questions and theories have risen that suggest that the penal system is racially biased when considering punishment and deciding when the death penalty is a congruent punishment to the crime committed. In David Gilboa’s report entitled, “Is the Death Penalty in America Racist?” Gilboa analyzes and studies three common conceptions on the death penalty and how it pertains to the African American race and Caucasian race.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

So, in many, if not most, of the cases, the accusers and the accused were unacquainted. Boyer and

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

They believe that after

Read More

More about Comparison Of Nicola Sacco And Bartolomeo Vanzetti

Related Topics

Open Document