ipl-logo

Compatibilism: Background And Key Terms Of Frankfurt

1057 Words5 Pages

Background & Key Terms:
• Frankfurt provides a compatibilist account for free will.
• Compatibilism: All events are caused, and some events/actions are free.
• Key Terms: o First-Order Desire: a desire to perform an action. o Will: an effective first-order desire. o Second-Order Desire: a desire to have a desire. o Second-Order Violation: to want a certain desire to be one’s will. o Freedom of Action: the freedom to do what you want. o Freedom of Will: the freedom to want what you want. o Wantons: those who have desires but do not have second-order violations.
Frankfurt’s Main Points & His Reasons Why:
• Frankfurt is trying to prove that there is a difference between people and other creatures. o The difference is the structure of a person’s …show more content…

o His theory accounts for our reluctance to believe that this freedom of will is enjoyed by the members of any other inferior species- other creatures do not have second-order desires. o Satisfies the condition that must be met by any theory that freedom of will should be regarded as desirable- enjoying free will means the satisfaction of desires of second or of higher orders. o Provides an analysis of one of the conditions of moral responsibility- he inquires what is meant by the assumption that someone is morally responsible for what he has done- explained below.
• “The question of the freedom of his will does not concern the relation between what he does and what he wants to do” - It concerns desires themselves. o Relationship between moral responsibility and the freedom of the will has been misunderstood. o It is not true that a person is morally responsible for what he has done only if his will was free when he did it. He may be morally responsible for having done it even though his will was not free at all.
 Example: The willing addict
• The willing addict’s will is not free as his desire to take the drug will make him take the drug regardless if this desire portrays his will …show more content…

o On the other hand, it is conceivable that a person is free to have the will he wants by chance, therefore it may be a matter of chance that some people enjoy freedom of will. o Also, conceivable that states of affairs can occur in another way than chance or as the outcome of a sequence of natural causes. Therefore, if events come about in this other way, then it is also possible that a person in that way enjoys freedom of will.

Conclusions/Main Concepts:
• Difference between people and other creatures - only humans have second-order desires.
• Freedom of action and freedom of will = all the freedoms you can want. o Even if you are an addict and choose to take a drug “against your will,” it is not really against your will as another first-order desire is actually your will.
• His theory of freedom of will and determinism are not competing theories.

My View:
• I believe Frankfurt’s theory is convincing and I agree that the difference between people and other creatures is second-order desires. A dog may want to chase his tail, but he does not have a desire or reason to actually want to chase his

Show More
Related

How Is Alton Harris Morally Responsible

760 Words | 4 Pages

The case of Robert Alton Harris, a convicted murderer who was executed in 1992 for his crimes, raises profound questions about free will and moral responsibility. In this essay, I will argue that Harris did not exercise free agency when committing the crimes, that he could not have done otherwise, and that he is morally responsible for his actions despite his background. Moreover, I will show how this scenario can be used to shed light on the possibility of free will and moral responsibility in a deterministic universe. First, let us consider the facts of the case.

Read More

Maltese Falcon Themes

1732 Words | 7 Pages

Everybody needs to be free; or if nothing else have some decision in life. We as a whole have our expert, family and social duties. Then again, the vast majority trust that they are free to pick what to do, from the most straightforward to the more complex. Fate and free has been a topic for philosophers and scholars. The term free will suggests that one can do whatever one likes, and that one is free.

Read More

Sanity And The Metaphysics Of Responsibility By Susan Wolf Summary

1508 Words | 7 Pages

In the paper “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility”, Susan Wolf discusses her ideas on what is necessary for an individual to be responsible for their actions. She argues that in order for the person to be held morally responsible for their actions, they need to be morally sane. To consider one to be morally sane, this individual must have an ideology that is able for them to distinguish right from wrong. Hence, a morally sane person must be able to reason and have a sound mind. Furthermore, Wolf establishes the sane deep-self view by applying other philosopher’s ideas.

Read More

The Impossibility Of Free Will In The Other Wes Moore

3797 Words | 16 Pages

BSTRACT All humans have the idealization of freedom and of choice. The given reason any person has this is their own free will. Giving them the option to say “yes” or “no” to whatever they please. There are no limitations to that, only obstacles and temptations. In Literature throughout history there is proof that free will can be taken away.

Read More

Impossibility Of Moral Responsibility By Galen Strawson

878 Words | 4 Pages

Lucy Bichakhchyan Introduction to Philosophy Second Short Written Assignment GALEN STRAWSON THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Galen Strawson is a British philosopher, who is famous for his philosophical works on free will, panpsychism, causality, determinism etc. This paper is about his article “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility”. The title of the article already gives away the stand that Strawson has considering Moral Responsibility..

Read More

Of Galen Strawson's Argument Of Moral Responsibility

1514 Words | 7 Pages

Responsibility is a complex concept that more often than not is loosely used within our day to day conversations to assign blame. At any given point, we are quick to blame those we see as being in charge of an action as being responsible for they consciously decide their actions. Although a debate can be had as to whether or not anyone can truly be held morally responsible for their chosen actions. There are crucial factors that must be considered as to whether it is just to assign responsibility. Galen Strawson has developed an argument for the non-existence of morally responsible action that is strongly structured and provides premises that are logically sound and linked to draw the conclusion that no one is responsible An analysis of the subject of morally responsibility will prove that Galen Strawson is correct with his argument of the

Read More

Chisholm's Human Freedom And The Self

1445 Words | 6 Pages

In "Human Freedom and the Self", Roderick Chisholm has taken a libertarian approach on the issue of free will and determinism. Libertarians believe that humans have free will and make a distinction that free will and determinism are incompatible. Chisholm has the same opinion. On the problem of human freedom, Chisholm thinks that “Human beings are responsible agents; but this fact appears to conflict with a deterministic view of human action (the view that every event that is involved in an act is caused by some other event); and it also appears to conflict with an indeterministic view of human action (the view that the act, or some event that is essential to the act, is not caused at all).”(Page 3). He does not agree that determinism or indeterminism

Read More

Evaluating Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

1495 Words | 6 Pages

He describes the objection as, “all men desire the apparent good, but have no control over the appearance, but the end appears to each man in a form answering to his character” (1114b).   This view argues that all people pursue that which seems good, but some people cannot see the true good, which is out of their control.   The immediate implication of this objection, if it is indeed true, suggests that “no one is responsible for his own evildoing” (1114b).

Read More

Galen Strawson's Analysis

786 Words | 4 Pages

Yet, one must be causa sui to achieve true moral responsibility. Hence, nothing is able to truly be morally responsible. Strawson 's whole purpose of writing the article is to change anyone 's mind who says that we should be responsible for the way we are and what we do as a result of the way we are. He believes we are lacking freedom and control of doing so. He argues that if we do something for a reason, that is how we are, so we must be responsible.

Read More

Boethius Boethius Free Will

1532 Words | 7 Pages

Free will is an important components of the human experience and

Read More

Persuasive Speech Outline On Abortion

1277 Words | 6 Pages

“I believe the freedom to choose my course in life but I do not believe I am free to choose the consequences of my

Read More

Determinism Vs Free Will

1777 Words | 8 Pages

But real free will, according to Taylor, appears in case of strong evaluations which determine important actions and decisions. Taylor, as well as Campbell, supposes that a person who makes acts has free choice to act in another way. And, “according to our definition, the act was freely performed. So not only would such acts be free, but they are also acts for which someone could be held morally responsible” (Free Will). So, Taylor assumes that moral responsibility is reflected in free choice of a person.

Read More

Three Subtitles Of Freedom Determinism And Libertarianism

571 Words | 3 Pages

Freedom is classified into three main subtitles. The three subtitles of freedom are determinism, indeterminism and libertarianism. To begin, determinism negates “the possibility of freedom, hence the possibility of personal responsibility” (Palmer, p226). Determinists believe that everything that happens is a necessity.

Read More

Arguments Against Free Will Essay

1075 Words | 5 Pages

This paper discusses whether or not our actions are controlled by free will. Someone can act freely whenever: (a) she could have done otherwise than she in fact does, or (b) it is up to her what she does. An example of an action of free will is I came to office hours today because I chose and wanted to come. An example of no free will is if I got pushed from behind and fell into the person in front of me and knocked them down. Acting with free will is very important.

Read More

Chronicle Of A Death Foretold Fate Analysis

1202 Words | 5 Pages

In order for free will free will to be tangible, an individual would have to have control over his or her actions regardless of any external factors. It can be argued that the inevitability of

Read More

More about Compatibilism: Background And Key Terms Of Frankfurt

Related Topics

Open Document