ipl-logo

What Was The Significance Of The Compromise Of 1850

472 Words2 Pages

The significance of the Compromise of 1850 lies on the continuation of peace accomplished by the Missouri Compromise of 1820, in spite of sectional contrasts. Opinions from the north and south were opposite, but the Compromise of 1850 made them achieve an interim political harmony. It fulfilled what it planned to accomplish at the time, to revive the Union and peace. Most politicians realized that the compromise was an interwoven and that it was an interim arrangement, best case scenario to delay the unavoidable Civil War.
In a session of give and take, the north and south were not so satisfied by what they got. The south gained by the strengthening of the fugitive slave law while the north gained another free state, California. Texas lost territory but was however remunerated with 10 million dollars to pay for its debts. The exchange of slaves was prohibited in Washington DC, yet slavery was most certainly not. Slavery was not limited in the territories of Utah and New Mexico. These actions, although they solved the problem regarding California 's status as a free or slave state, did not provide any long-term, fundamental principle for future decisions on the sectional balance of new territories.
The Compromise of 1850 additionally permitted …show more content…

The unintended result was a surge of pro-slavery and abolitionist supporters to Kansas to vote in favor of slavery or its repeal. The act nullified the 1820 Missouri Compromise as Kansas had been formally a slavery-free territory. The outcome was a civil war in Kansas known as the Bleeding Kansas, which was to be a prelude to the American Civil War. The Republican Party was made because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and became the leading party in the north. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected as the first Republican president of the United

Show More
Related

Missouri Compromise Research Paper

328 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

Read More

Charles Grandison Finney, A Woman's Rights Activist

499 Words | 2 Pages

Questions for Days 131-150: 1. Charles Grandison Finney was an evangelist who was a preacher who helped in religiously reviving Americans. He was the first of the professional evangelists. 2. Dorothea Dix was a crusader who supported mentally impaired people.

Read More

What Is The Compromise Of 1877 Dbq

364 Words | 2 Pages

The Compromise of 1877 led to a lack of control of the south that allowed the KKK to start their stream of terror Lynching was often well publicized and profitable. Living in fear was common for blacks at the time. This lead to the Great Migration, blacks started to move North moving into cities About 6 million blacks moved to the north hoping for jobs and a better life however in doing so they were treated with segregation. Segregation lead to black communities. These communities started to build churches and schools.

Read More

Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

175 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

Read More

Five Resolutions To The Compromise Of 1850, By Henry Clay

289 Words | 2 Pages

On January 29, 1850, Henry Clay proposed five resolutions to this conflict, they were reviewed and revised and put into one, both opponents were not satisfied with the bill and the senate declined the bill. Supporters of the bill separated the five proposals into five different bills and the were passed, becoming the Five Bills of the Compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 was to try to keep both northern and southern states somewhat satisfied on the issue of slavery in the new states. It made California a free state, New Mexico, and Utah had the right to choose if they wanted to be free slaves or not, the District of Columbia abolished slavery, Texas loses territory to New Mexico and the Fugitive Slave Act was passed forcing northerners

Read More

Compromises In 1860

510 Words | 3 Pages

Geographically the United States was divided with the North being against slavery and the South supporting slavery. This division in the states had a great affect on the decision making in congress

Read More

Calhoun Argument For The Compromise Of 1850

818 Words | 4 Pages

Eventually, the Compromise of 1850 managed to pass, but as several smaller

Read More

What Was The Missouri Compromise

261 Words | 2 Pages

As westward expansion continued, the number of free states would be twice that of the already existing, and only, slave states. The Missouri compromise showed the different opinions that the regions, mainly the north and south, had about slavery. In the north they

Read More

Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1121 Words | 5 Pages

Douglas, was an important election that would, and did, go down in history. Lincoln had opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, created by Stephen Douglas, which lead him into becoming a Republican. Here, nobody was able to Compromise. He ran against Stephen Douglas, and won the election with getting one hundred eighty electoral votes, and Douglas getting twelve (Southern Democrat Breckinridge seventy-two, and Constitutional Union Bell getting thirty-nine) (Doc H).

Read More

Political Disputes Before 1860

478 Words | 2 Pages

The U.S was only able to settle political disputes through compromise until 1860 because of the increasing sectionalism, the Abolitionist Movement and the Secession of South Carolina. New states joined into congress creating an unbalanced senate forcing congress to make decisions to balance the nation between freedom and slavery. The Missouri Compromise failed as an attempt to maintain peace between the North and South because it created an greater sense of sectionalism throughout the country. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a decision to make Missouri a slave state to maintain an even number of free and slave states. It led to uproar in congress and the North retaliated by declaring the rest of the Louisiana territory to be free.

Read More

What Is The Compromise Of 1860

378 Words | 2 Pages

Due to the fact that the South had more of an agricultural economy, the Southerners thought that the states should have the right to decide whether residents could own slaves, rather than the federal government. In 1846 a congressman from Pennsylvania named David Wilmot introduced a bill to the House of Representatives called the Wilmot Proviso. This said slavery would not be allowed in any western territory acquired from Mexico. Of course most of the politicians from the North loved the idea, while the politicians from the South did not. The Missouri Compromise on March 3, 1820 (also called the Compromise of 1820) was the first major legislative compromise that was passed to draw a line between slave and free territory.

Read More

Effects Of The Compromise Of 1850

246 Words | 1 Pages

Once again, American politicians were forced to revisit the issue of slavery and its expansion west when the United States gained vast tracts of land in the west after the end of the Mexican-American War. The issue of slavery, which had not been at the forefront of national politics, once again came to great prominence. Political factions divided and some threatened that their states would leave the Union if President Taylor brought California and New Mexico into the Union without going through the territorial phase (Shi and Tindall p. 501). As a result, the Compromise of 1850 was formed by the great compromiser Henry Clay, which ensured that both the North and South’s interests remained intact. In short, the Compromise guaranteed that California

Read More

What Was The Basis For The Compromise Of 1850

826 Words | 4 Pages

It was proposed by Stephen A. Douglas–Abraham Lincoln’s opponent in the influential Lincoln-Douglas debates–the bill overturned the Missouri Compromise’s use of 36°30’ line as the boundary between slave and free territory. This was Douglas’s effort to bring Nebraska into the union and paved way for the north to make a transcontinental railroad. By the time Kansas was admitted to statehood in 1861 after an internal civil war, southern states had begun to secede from the Union. The conflicts that arose between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers in the aftermath of the act’s passage led to the period of violence known as Bleeding Kansas, and helped paved the way for the American Civil War

Read More

American Identity Dbq

758 Words | 4 Pages

The Southern states even threatened to secede because of the differences in opinion on slavery. To prevent this, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state, but in exchange, Maine was admitted as a free state. In addition, all states and lands north of the 36°30’ parallel would be free (except for Missouri). This ‘compromise’ somehow managed to hold America together, but no one was really satisfied.

Read More

Territorial Expansion Was The Main Cause Of The Civil War

976 Words | 4 Pages

Mass influx of settlers to the Kansas and Nebraska territories forced Congress to test the Compromise of 1850 by allowing settlers in each area to determine, through popular sovereignty, whether or not slavery would be permitted in each region. However, the act spurred a mass influx of slave owners and independent farmers into Kansas and both groups went with the explicit aim of voting for or against slavery in the territory. The result was conflict and violence, leading to the events of "Bleeding Kansas" by 1855. The political effects were enormous. It split the Whig Party, one of the two major political parties in the country at the time.

Read More

More about What Was The Significance Of The Compromise Of 1850

Related Topics

Open Document