ipl-logo

Calhoun Argument For The Compromise Of 1850

818 Words4 Pages

During the early part of the 1800's, the Northern states banned the buying, trading, and use of slaves. They also advocated to get rid of slavery in the entire country. The Southern states had been using slaves to run their economy since their founding, as they did not have access to the plentiful natural resources found to the North. This caused a major conflict for Congress and our country, who all sensed a civil war would come if nothing was done about it. Then, in an attempt to make both sides happy for as long as possible, Senator Henry Clay proposed his idea for the Compromise of 1850. It was hoped it would ease the tension, as well as solve border disputes in the Southwest and the debate over whether or not California should be a state. …show more content…

Senator John Calhoun wrote a speech against it, but was too ill to deliver it, so Senator James Murray of Virginia read it instead on March 4, 1850. Three days later, Senator Daniel Webster gave his “Seventh of March” speech in favor of the Compromise, beginning with the words "Mr. President, I wish to speak today, not as a Massachusetts man, nor as a Northern man, but as an American, and a member of the Senate of the United States... I speak for the preservation of the Union. Hear me for my cause."
Webster spoke for about three hours to Congress. People all over the country heard about the speech, and gave it very mixed reactions. Many people, especially Southerners, supported him wholeheartedly when it came to intensifying the Fugitive Slave Act. There was enough backlash from his native New England, who claimed that he had been bribed to say some of what he said, that forced him to resign.
Eight months of debate in congress followed Clay’s proposal, with the three most prominent voices being the aforementioned John C. Calhoun, Daniel Webster, and Henry Clay. During the summer that year, President Zachary Taylor died of the stomach flu, and was succeeded by his vice president, Millard Fillmore, who was much more in favor of the compromise. Eventually, the Compromise of 1850 managed to pass, but as several smaller

Show More
Related
133 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1877 was brought to attention recently, shortly after the Presidential Election of 1876. It called to resolve the disputed 1876 presidential elections in the United States. This was supposedly a deal to make it so Rutherford Hayes, the Republican Party candidate running for president, could become president. The Democrats would also become powerful in the governments within the South. Having Hayes, when he would become president, promise to allow troops to be pulled out of the rebelling states and slave states out of the South, it would the Democrats to become just that.

Read More
138 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 did not give a solution to slavery, either. Henry Clay said that California should enter the union as a free state, then the rest of the states would have no limits on slavery. Also trading in Washington, D.C. would be banned. The slavery itself would not be banned. People objected against this.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

There are many similarities and differences between the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850. However many people manage to mix the two up, understandably so, as they both sound the same. But there are many differences that people should be aware of. For example, One compromise kept peace for a period of time, and the other one just riled up more people. Understanding these differences is crucial if one would like to learn about the Civil war.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

The Rhetorical Strategy of a Powerful Argument Patrick Henry’s “Speech of the Virginia Convention” had many interesting rhetorical strategies. The ones that were most notable was diction, logs appeal, allusion, and imagery. The “Speech of the Virginia Convention” was a strong argument to convince the patriots, loyalist, and the colonist for freedom. Patrick Henry only wanted the best for his fellow americans and for him. His “Speech of the Virginia Convention” led the argument to war with the british.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

1. John Quincy Adams He won the election of 1824 with the help of henry clay who then became his Secretary of State. He wanted to change and establish many things that angered many people, especially the southerners because they would have to suffer the taxes. The way he dealt with the Cherokee Indian tribe went against what the Georgians wanted. 2.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

Read More
1146 Words | 5 Pages

The 1780s seemed many to be a truly critical period for the newly independent United States. Andrew Jackson who asserted his power during peacetime was a large supporter of democracy. In the election of 1824, John Quincy Adams was running against Andrew Jackson. John Quincy Adams, the president from 1824 to 1828, lost re-election to Andrew Jackson. As a result, Andrew Jackson became the United States’ seventh president in 1829.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

In his fiery speech to the Senate, given on March 7, 1850, shortly after the passing of the Compromise of 1850, Senator Daniel Webster expresses his views of secession to Abraham Lincoln, presenting the Compromise of 1850 as a Union-saving measure. The Compromise of 1850 admitted California as a free state, but also enforced a stringent Fugitive Slave Act, which forced runaway slaves to be returned to their masters. Webster’s powerful speech outlines his feelings towards the South and secession, clearly showing that the speaker believed in a united, but also in a way divided, nation. Daniel Websterwas originally a lawyer and later served as a Massachusetts congressman and senator. As a congressman, he strongly opposed the War of 1812, the annexation of Texas, and going to war with Mexico.

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

2 The War of 1812 a war that was forgotten by most and admired by very little. For this was the War that we showed that we can stand on our own as a nation and make a name for yourself. Many know the war of 1812 as just a 2nd round of the US vs UK. James Madisons the president at the time which this war is also known as Madisons War he said about the war. "

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

A martyr; a politician; a man who spoke with the purpose to make change. That defines Charles Sumner. Charles Sumner influenced the Civil War and our nation by giving masterful, yet ruthless, speeches. He influenced the war by not standing for slavery, and fighting for slaves’ rights no matter what. And lastly, he influenced the nation by becoming a martyr, and in doing so, he ended up showing the true colors of both the North and South.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

It required both sides to seek fugitives which went against the North's belief and caused them to be under the impression of being part of the slave system. Slavery was considered morally wrong to them and they made many attempts to have it abolished. Comparatively, the South received slaves and were seen as possessing a free pass. The Compromise of 1850 included this law along with the abolishment of the slave trade in the District of Columbia hoping to have pleased the North and South. In contrast, the North disunited even more based off of the favoritism towards the South.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

There were many important Compromises between the years of 1820 and 1860, some that worked completely and some that didn’t. In the early nineteenth century, people were good at compromising and making things work for everyone. How long did perfect compromising actually last? Slavery began to split the nation apart, causing compromising to become hard to do.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

He beat the woolen Bill for raising tariff, He got elected Vice President of the United States . Calhoun left office from Vice-President on July 16. John defends slavery as a "Positive good' which meant it was a good idea. He assisted the van Buren independent

Read More
1860 Words | 8 Pages

“It has been my invariable rule to do all for the Union, if any man wants the key of my heart, let him take the key of the Union, and that is the key to my heart. . . .” -Henry Clay. An American politician by the name of Henry Clay was an active member to Congress for the majority of his life. Many historical events such as The Missouri Compromise of 1820, Tariff of 1816, the American System, and The Compromise of 1850 were constructed and resolved with Henry Clay as the primary source. His intentions for the many years of his political years were not for the popularity of his success, but more for his love of the Union.

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

What were the main provisions of the Compromise of 1850? Who supported it? Who opposed it? How did it pass? Who benefited the most from it and why?

Read More

More about Calhoun Argument For The Compromise Of 1850

Related Topics

Open Document