ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Conflict Between 1820 And 1860

496 Words2 Pages

Compromise, a resolution of a conflict that is achieved only if both sides come to a mutual conscientious, was used to terminate political conflicts. The North and South relied heavily on this aspect since they had two distinct perspectives regarding slavery. However, compromise did not have the great effect as it was visioned because it furthered tension between the North and South by rewarding the South fully with slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 initially was seen as just because there was a 36°30 N line established to balance the amount of free and slave states. However, slavery was prohibited in the leftovers of the Louisiana Purchase which angered the South. The South used slaves for cash since slaves' labor stimulated their economy. Though, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 formed by President Jackson was applied to gain land from the Native Americans in the East which some of the South used. The South still gained access to land to put more slaves to work thus gratifying them. Additionally, the North and South reached another issue regarding runaway slaves in 1850. …show more content…

It required both sides to seek fugitives which went against the North's belief and caused them to be under the impression of being part of the slave system. Slavery was considered morally wrong to them and they made many attempts to have it abolished. Comparatively, the South received slaves and were seen as possessing a free pass. The Compromise of 1850 included this law along with the abolishment of the slave trade in the District of Columbia hoping to have pleased the North and South. In contrast, the North disunited even more based off of the favoritism towards the South. The government continued to stress the importance of compromise through the Kansas-Nebraska Act and Crittenden Compromise but

Show More
Related
61 Words | 1 Pages

The cause of most political dispute around 1820-1860 was mostly about slavery. There has been division between the North and the South, though compromise had usually serve in calming the disagreement. However, nearing 1860, political compromise appeared useless. Comprises simply postponed addressing the issue, and led to even more greater issues than needed,compromise wasn’t working politically, socially,and economically for our nation.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

I don’t think that the Missouri Compromise dealt with the sectional conflict over slavery. Even with many of the people upset with the compromise congress went ahead and passed it or shove it out of the way. The Missouri Compromise did nothing but intensified the conflict over slavery between the North and the South taking away the grip of the Northern states. Missouri was considered a slave state, making it so the north could outlaw slavery above the 36° 30° line and the south expanded their region of slavery. The Missouri Compromise split the democratic republican alliance which held most of national politics for about twenty years.

Read More
379 Words | 2 Pages

Before the Civil War, Americans tried to resolve their differences between free states and slave states by enacting compromises. The Missouri Compromise and the three-fifths compromise were temporary solutions used to keep the south happy in hopes that they wouldn’t secede. These compromises failed because neither the free states, nor the slave states where happy with the compromise. The failure of these compromises were what led to a war between the north and South.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Another was the economy which depended on slavery because of cheap labor, but The North was depended on trading and factories. This eliminated the fight between the North and South by Three-Fifths Compromise. In 1783 the Constitution convention proposed that a tax should be a portion of the population, it had come again slave issue not paying taxes equally. It was a great solution to add on to Three-Fifths Compromise. Commerce Compromise was over, the government that Congress makes the rules and regulation between the Northern and Southern States in 1787.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

So, this essay will explain one from the other. The Missouri Compromise has many differences from the Compromise of 1850. One difference would be that in breaking up the different parts of the Louisiana Territory, it created peace between Northerners and Southerners. The Northerners were happy that more territory was safe for freed slaves, although they weren't quite happy that there was still slavery in the USA. However, the southerners stayed happy until the Southerners realized that this gave congress a say in which states could have slavery.

Read More
1506 Words | 7 Pages

One of the very important items of the Compromise of 1850 was the provision for a stronger Fugitive Slave Law. With the Fugitive Slave Law, it made was federal crime to not return a runaway slave to the south. With this law any suspected runaway slave was to be tried by a single judge, but not by a jury. The judge was compensated by a system that would provide them with more money if they decide that the slave was guilty and not innocent. Obviously this law encouraged people not to harbor runaway slaves, but when the slaves were caught it provide the judge an incentive to have them returned to the south.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

The United States gained its independence in 1776. After that, the United States struggled with numerous tariffs and compromises that can be arguing to be the cause of the civil war. With the gruesome acts of slavery in the south, it show that the north and south have been fed up and was begin to tear apart. The rise of political parties contributed to numerous political beliefs and ideas.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

By 1860, the United States of America had turned into the Divided States of America. The once unified country had let slavery divide the country by a thin red line. A thin red line of blood being shed by slaves and those fighting for what they believe to be right and moral. This thin red line caused those of the North and South to lose sight of the purpose of the United States; a country that was created as a haven for all, where anyone could be viewed with equality, and freedom was tangible for every person. Rather the United States began to create social classes that were next to impossible to discard.

Read More
1458 Words | 6 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 done what it set out to do, it kept the nation united, but the solution was only for a little while. Over the following decade the country's citizens became further separated over the issue of

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

During the early part of the 1800's, the Northern states banned the buying, trading, and use of slaves. They also advocated to get rid of slavery in the entire country. The Southern states had been using slaves to run their economy since their founding, as they did not have access to the plentiful natural resources found to the North. This caused a major conflict for Congress and our country, who all sensed a civil war would come if nothing was done about it. Then, in an attempt to make both sides happy for as long as possible, Senator Henry Clay proposed his idea for the Compromise of 1850.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

The U.S was only able to settle political disputes through compromise until 1860 because of the increasing sectionalism, the Abolitionist Movement and the Secession of South Carolina. New states joined into congress creating an unbalanced senate forcing congress to make decisions to balance the nation between freedom and slavery. The Missouri Compromise failed as an attempt to maintain peace between the North and South because it created an greater sense of sectionalism throughout the country. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a decision to make Missouri a slave state to maintain an even number of free and slave states. It led to uproar in congress and the North retaliated by declaring the rest of the Louisiana territory to be free.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

The Indian Removal Act was passed during Andrew Jackson’s presidency on May 28, 1830. This authorized the president to grant land that was west of the Mississippi River to Indians that agreed to give up their homeland. They believed that the land could be more profitably farmed by non-Indians.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Conflict Between 1820 And 1860

Related Topics

Open Document