Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

1146 Words5 Pages

The 1780s seemed many to be a truly critical period for the newly independent United States. Andrew Jackson who asserted his power during peacetime was a large supporter of democracy. In the election of 1824, John Quincy Adams was running against Andrew Jackson. John Quincy Adams, the president from 1824 to 1828, lost re-election to Andrew Jackson. As a result, Andrew Jackson became the United States’ seventh president in 1829. In early 19th century, cotton was one of important products in the southern. Andrew Jackson believed that Federal comes first than individual states. In this context, his politics were similar Hamilton’s. However, Jackson’s concern for agriculture and farmers is similar to Jefferson’s view. Overall, when Andrew Jackson …show more content…

During that time, the quality of the British product was better than America’s. Therefore, the Northern cotton industry struggled. At the same time, the Southern enjoyed almost complete free trade with the British and other European countries, because there was barely tariff on imports. For this reason, there was a conflict of interests between the north and the south over a high protective tariff of 1828 removal of agricultural and marine products, industrial products including non-tariff barriers. Even though this policy contributed to the Southern agriculture economy, it put an enormous amount of scale pressure on existent infrastructures in the north area. It built tension between Northern and Southern economies. To solve this problem, congress passed customs laws to protect the United States manufacturers against competition from the British and other European manufactured …show more content…

Calhoun, the former vice president of the United States, asserted that any states can null and void the protective tariff with anonymous pamphlet with title, South Carolina Exposition and Protest. In his perspective, as one of representatives of the south, protective tariff law should be void for South Carolina’s economy. Consequently, the Convention adopted an Ordinance of Nullification, which declared the protective tariff law null and void in South Carolina in November. And even more, Robert Y. Hayne argued that states can secede from the federal government. On the other hand, Daniel Webster who served as a Massachusetts orator, denounced South Carolina’s nullification by saying, “Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!” Calhoun’s Ordinance of Nullification was not an ingenious idea. James Madison and Thomas Jefferson already adopted ordinance of nullification when they were against to Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798 and 1799. Even though this precedent, Calhoun had considerable difficulty in bring support for the nullification. Congress passed tariff of 1832 which was another tariff that southerners saw as favoring for northern industries. And this time, people who supported Nullification win as, “An act in alteration of the several acts imposing duties on imports, approved on the nineteenth day of May, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight and