ipl-logo

State Rights And South Carolina Argumentative Analysis

312 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Slavery in colonial america

constitution that allows “to protect domestic producers from foreign competitors” (Hummel 15). The South in general did not like the idea of federal government denying state rights and South Carolina backed by John C. Calhoun nullified this tariff by calling it unconstitutional, oppressive, and unjust (Hummel 15).
State rights go hand and hand with slavery and new territories into the Union at the time. Slavery increasingly divided the nation after the war of 1812. This made it very hard for states entering the union to decide to be either a free state or a slave state. Many northerners were worried about states entering. The compromise in 1820 by Henry Clay allowed Missouri a slave state, while Maine would become a free state. Also a line
Show More
Related
136 Words | 1 Pages

While the North tried to stop the South from withdrawing their spot in the Union, the North also denied the Southern states rights. Sectional groups assembled in the North regarding the “unnatural feeling and hostility” to slavery in the South. “ By consolidating their strength, they have placed the strength... no avail in protecting Southern rights (Document I). The Northerners believed that slavery is not right, and also that “the demand of African slavery throughout the confederacy” is unheard of.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

However, that only further benefited Slave states. Slavery was disputed again when Northern states wanted the government to have complete power over trade with the other nations. Southern states depended heavily on trade and feared that the North would get enough votes to interfere with their slave and agricultural

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

In the era before the Civil War America was expanding westward. The Louisiana Purchase and other lands gained help to give America new land to expand on, but this leaded to issues with the division of free and slave states. As Missouri became a state they wanted to become a slave state, which caused trouble. In order to keep equilibrium between the states, Congress came up with the Missouri Compromise of 1820.The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state and Maine a free state. The Treaty also made a line within the Louisiana Territory to keep slavery from moving up the

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson believed in asserting the power of the federal government. It became clear in the dispute that arose South Carolina and the issue of nullification in the year of 1832 to 1833. South Carolina acted out against the Tariff of 1828. They campaigned heavily against the tariff, justifying their arguments with the principles set out in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions written by Jefferson and Madison to support states’ rights. They supported their case by also arguing that the U.S. constitution allowed the states to individually nullify federal laws for the whole union.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Although in the Missouri Compromise, Missouri became a slave state and Maine became a free state, it was an example of disunity. All new states north of the Mason-Dixon Line would be free and new states southward would be slave states. As a result, there was also an unbalanced sectional population between the North and South. (Doc. E & F).

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

After the thirty-four years, the slavery debate became a problem yet again. Therefore, the Missouri Compromise essentially shoved the slavery conflict out of view. Overall, I believe that the compromise resulted in the neither the North nor the

Read More
1031 Words | 5 Pages

The founders wanted the two states to join the Union to create a more vigorous government; because the founders wanted to keep the support of the Southern delegates, they allowed the Atlantic slave trade to keep operating by allowing no law to ban the Atlantic slave trade until 1808. Therefore, the founders didn’t abolish slavery because they thought that if they took action to eliminate slavery, the Southern delegates wouldn’t allow South Carolina and Georgia to join the Union, which would have been an unfavorable outcome for the nation. They didn’t want to risk that because the Southern delegates wouldn’t agree to the Constitution, the founders created and wouldn’t let the states join the

Read More
1168 Words | 5 Pages

Initially, the first Missouri compromise of 1820 was an agreement between South and North involving primarily the regulation of slavery in the western territory. It prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel of 36, 30' line except within the boundary of the proposed state of Missouri. In other words, the imaginary 36, 30 lines across the southern border of Missouri stated that anything above that line is a free state and anything below that line is a sate. The issue of this compromise was that the admission of Missouri as a slave state would give slave states (southern) control over the senate. This crisis was averted when Maine was admitted to the union to balance out the states.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise greatly limited the growth and development of slavery in the United States. It allowed Missouri to become a state, and to allow slaves, and Maine, as a free state. The compromise also prohibited the practice of slavery in the northern portion of the Louisiana Territory. By this time, the importation of slaves from Africa had been outlawed, and they could only be purchased within the country. This meant also meant, that states that entered would be free states.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

Between 1800 and 1850, western expansion played a major role in the sectional tensions between the North and South in America. Most of this would stem from whether or not new territory would be free or slave states. Later on, there would be compromises in place to alleviate the tension but disunity between the North and South was very prevalent. In 1803, the Louisiana Purchase from the French got a rise out of the New England Federalist party.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The North wanted it to be a free state while the South wanted it to be a slave state. Monroe settled this by signing the Missouri Compromise, which split the country into two parts: the North (slave-free states) and South (slave states). It allowed Missouri to join the union, while Maine would be declared as a free state. James Monroe was praised for his foreign policy, the Monroe Doctrine.

Read More
897 Words | 4 Pages

That made the people in the north mad,so Congress held a meeting and voted. They came to a compromise. If Missouri became a slave state Maine would be a free state and no slave states could be above 36/30 north. In 1825 his terms were up and he stopped being

Read More
134 Words | 1 Pages

1. The first argument of the petitioner is that all free slaves in the state of South Carolina should be sent out and forbidden from returning, because their presents would be influential to slave’s and caused an uprising in order to gain their freedom. The second argument is that there should be a restriction on how many Negros can be hired and those who are hired should be watched closely by their masters. To insure that there will be no assembly amongst blacks. The third argument is they must control how dresses, in order to prevent them from thinking they are superior.

Read More
1407 Words | 6 Pages

It is no secret that when the US constitution was ratified, the privileges and immunities and basic human rights were intended for a very specific group of people who were considered citizens of the new colony. According to McClain and Stewart’s Can We All Get Along, the committee that drafted the founding document was appointed to devise a new national seal after the advent of the Articles of confederation; the idea proposed by Benjamin Franklin John Adams and Thomas Jefferson was for the seal to represent the countries of the colonists’ origin. The countries included were England, Scotland, Ireland, France, Germany, and Holland. This leaves thousands upon thousands of people living in America and not being represented or even recognized by

Read More

More about State Rights And South Carolina Argumentative Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document