ipl-logo

How Did Western Expansion Affect The Sectional Tension Between 1800 And 1850

473 Words2 Pages

Between 1800 and 1850, western expansion played a major role in the sectional tensions between the North and South in America. Most of this would stem from whether or not new territory would be free or slave states. Later on, there would be compromises in place to alleviate the tension but disunity between the North and South was very prevalent. In 1803, the Louisiana Purchase from the French got a rise out of the New England Federalist party. They were against western expansion because they believed it would reduce power and the influence of the party and the northeastern states. This would spawn secessionist schemes from the vice president Aaron Burr. He had no interest in continuing to be part of the Union, openly discussing seceding from …show more content…

When Missouri applied for statehood in 1819, James Tallmadge of New York would only support the admission of this state if only new slaves were banned and if the current slaves of the area were freed. White inhabitants of the Missouri refused the offer and the House of Representatives would later on block the admission. The South were not pleased. They were unwilling to break their commitment to slavery and saw it was unfair that Missouri had be to upheld to conditions that other states were not. They even defended slavery by saying it was a “necessary evil” and that Christ himself gave sanction to slavery. They used their power in the Senate to prevent statehood from Maine which was trying to disjoint from Massachusetts. After years of debate, Henry Clay composed political agreements called the Missouri Compromise set to admit Maine (separating from Massachusetts) as a Free State in 1820 and Missouri as a Slave State in 1821. Also in the agreement accepted that slavery would be banned in future admissions to the Union above the Missouri Compromise line (N of latitude 36 30’) except Missouri. This compromise maintained a balance in the Senate between the North and South. During the Mexican-American war an antislavery Democratic congressmen named David Wilmot followed the sentiment that the power of slavery was aiming to govern the country and its laws. He in turn, proposed the Wilmot Proviso, which planned to ban

Show More
Related

The Wilmot Proviso During The Mexican-American War

269 Words | 2 Pages

The Wilmot Proviso was proposed during the Mexican-American War. David Wilmot (a Democrat) submitted the Wilmot Proviso. The Proviso meant that if the United States won they would not turn the Mexican people who were on the land into slaves. This passed through the House of Representatives (based on population), but not the Senate (equal number of reps from slave and free states). In order for the Wilmot Proviso to be passed it needed at least two thirds of the Senate, (did not happen).

Read More

Als Before The Events Of The Missouri Compromise

1891 Words | 8 Pages

NHD Research Paper Throughout the years leading up to 1819 The northern anti-slavery states were constantly conflicting with the pro-slavery southern states. The states were even as there were 11 pro-slavery states, and 11 anti-slavery states. The conflict went back and forth for many years, and the Louisiana Purchase only added fuel to the fire. Both sides were constantly trying to find a way to get ahead of the other.

Read More

Bleeding Kansas Dbq

297 Words | 2 Pages

One key issue between the two parts of the country was whether or not slavery would expand westward to any newly acquired territories. This had been an issue for a long time and ultimately after failing to reach a compromise the country fell back on popular sovereignty or letting people in the new territories decide whether or not they wanted slaver. This however provided no solution as can be seen in the incident “Bleeding Kansas”. This was a series of violent acts in Kansas between those who were for and against slaver.

Read More

Summary: Contradicting William Jay's Slavery

461 Words | 2 Pages

Another reason was The Wilmot Proviso,In August 1846, Representative David Wilmot, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, proposed an expansion to a war appropriations bill. His revision, known as the Wilmot Proviso, recommended that in any region the United States picked up from Mexico “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist.” It was progressively understood that the Mexican individuals were against servitude and that the area was unsatisfactory for its spread, and in this manner the domain taken from it would be a free region upon its alliance into the Union. The annexation however contributed another conflict that sparked a division between who are with or against the annexation of northern mexico, because the extra land acquired from the northern mexico will be added to the union as a free state rather than a slave state which will consequently increase the number and power of free states over the slave states. Driven by Senator John C. Calhoun, the position of the anti-annexation powers was established in two primary convictions: that extension would aggravate sectionalism to at the expense of the Union, and that the force of the South would be extraordinarily decreased by the addition of

Read More

How Did Louis And Whiskey Rebellion Influence George Washington's Domestic Policy

1837 Words | 8 Pages

The Missouri Compromise started with the subject of slavery and how westerners could not agree whether to permit it or to exclude it. Those settling to the south wanted slavery for economic reasons such as labor while those settling to the north had no use for slavery at all. Politicians in Congress had attempted to preserve a sectional balance between the North and the South. There had been a balance of 11 slave and 11 free states but once Missouri bided for statehood the North raised alarm because slavery was well established there. The issue here was that if Missouri came in as a slave state, it would tip the political balance in the South’s favor.

Read More

Sectionalism During 1800-1850

314 Words | 2 Pages

During 1800-1850 the united states experienced a period of sectionalism. Sectionalism The United states were divided into the northeast, south and the west. There were many different reasons for this division of the states. In my paper I will point out a few points from each section that caused the period of sectionalism. I will first start off by talking about the North.

Read More

Disagreement Between The North And South Dbq Analysis

367 Words | 2 Pages

Much of the disagreement between the north and south was caused by the status of slavery, particularly what would happen in expansion states. The northern states wanted to eliminate slavery from new states, and ideally they wanted no slavery in the country in general. On the other hand, southern states believed that slavery should expand with the country. For example, a man from Georgia argued that new territory should be able to have the choice as to whether or not they will have slavery. But the north, however, “insists that while the territory was partly acquired by Southern men, is partly owned by Southern men, that they shall be excluded from its soil”(Document B).

Read More

Sectionalism Dbq

801 Words | 4 Pages

Southern statesmen desired to hold the West and the South together as a single political party. The theory on which they based such hope was simple: they both produced raw materials and bought manufactured goods. The union of the two sections prior to further economic expansion seemed perfect. However, Northern statesmen were not blind to such interests and also recognized the importance of the formation of strong ties with the agrarian West and bringing their produce to the north. The development of canals and railways would cement this economic union, and the results were evident.

Read More

Territorial Expansion And National Unity From 1800-1850

741 Words | 3 Pages

Territorial expansion and national unity from 1800-1850 involved many events. Western expansion boosted national unity at first, spurred the issue of slavery, and created extreme sectionalism between the north and the south. There are many events that helped boost national unity like the Louisiana Purchase, Manifest Destiny, Era of Good Feelings, and the Monroe Doctrine. The United States needed more land in order to continue moving out West.

Read More

Compromises In 1860

510 Words | 3 Pages

P.6 Compromises seemed to be working in 1820 as a solution to political issues that America agreed to disagreed on. As seen in the Missouri Compromise, where Henry Clay made slaves free in twelve states and not free in the other twelve; in order to keep everything balanced. But between the period of 1820 to 1860, compromising took a shift and no longer seemed to be the solution. Compromises worked with Henry Clay in the Missouri compromise in 1820 but by 1860 due to a series of geographic, political, and social changes compromises were impossible.

Read More

Jesse James Research Paper

992 Words | 4 Pages

Because Missouri was a “slave state” that did not secede from the Union, many of the residents had a deeply divided view of the

Read More

Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1121 Words | 5 Pages

The issue the compromise was about was whether there should be slavery in the western territories. Maine wanted to be added to the Union, however, slavery was banned there. If Maine were to be added to the Union, it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the nation and the Senate. So, the Missouri Compromise, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state, and allowed Missouri to be entered into the Union as a slave state.

Read More

What Is The Compromise Of 1860

378 Words | 2 Pages

Due to the fact that the South had more of an agricultural economy, the Southerners thought that the states should have the right to decide whether residents could own slaves, rather than the federal government. In 1846 a congressman from Pennsylvania named David Wilmot introduced a bill to the House of Representatives called the Wilmot Proviso. This said slavery would not be allowed in any western territory acquired from Mexico. Of course most of the politicians from the North loved the idea, while the politicians from the South did not. The Missouri Compromise on March 3, 1820 (also called the Compromise of 1820) was the first major legislative compromise that was passed to draw a line between slave and free territory.

Read More

What Are The Key Events Of Westward Expansion During The Nineteenth Century

3912 Words | 16 Pages

Ironically, the Democrats were the most supportive party of the idea. The Whigs were opposed to the idea of expanding in the name of their superiority, as they feared it would advocate slaveholding. It is also worth noting that while the idea of branching out like this was flourishing, an exceptional amount of division was taking place. The annexation of the independent republic of Texas took place in the same years as the term grew popular, and the subsequent Mexican American War probably helped it along as patriotism grew as a result. The political debates on slavery were also heating up, and were dividing the country into Southern and Northern sub-republics.

Read More

Westward Expansion Essay

703 Words | 3 Pages

The Westward Expansion all started when America made the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. There were many benefits from the purchase for the US that the French didn’t realize before they sold it. The purchase gave the US access to the Mississippi river which allowed for expansion of river trade to the North and South from the center of the US. The port city of New Orleans was bought by the US and its prosperity benefited the US greatly. The US sent Lewis and Clark west to investigate the land they purchased.

Read More

More about How Did Western Expansion Affect The Sectional Tension Between 1800 And 1850

Related Topics

Open Document