ipl-logo

Impact Of The Missouri Compromise

969 Words4 Pages

What impact did the Missouri Compromise have on future territories and their entrance to the union? To understand the Missouri Compromise fully, understanding the events that took place prior to 1820 is essential. The War of 1812 ended with “the Federalist Party all but destroyed.” After the fall of the federalist party, we entered a time period called the Era of Good Feelings. It received this name “due to the one-party dominance” . The party dominating the political elections and the U.S Congress was the Democratic-Republicans also referred to as the Jeffersonian Republicans. The Era of Good Feelings was a happy time in America because there wasn’t much political tension throughout the population because the lone single party, the Democratic-Republicans, …show more content…

Being “the first great Congressional compromise over the slavery issue” , the Compromise was very important because it set a precedent that Congress can dictate and regulate slavery in new territories entering the Union. This might not have seemed like a very big issue at the time, but a few decades later this became a very hot topic for debate. The Missouri Compromise was always a solution that just postponed the Civil War, the war was inevitable. Without everyone being in agreement over the issue of slavery, there would always be tensions between states. The Missouri Compromise was abolished in 1854 when the Kansas-Nebraska Act was introduced. The Kansas-Nebraska Act removed the provision that slavery would not extend north of the 36-30 line. The Missouri Compromise seemed to settle the issue of slavery at the time being, but it’s true issues still were on the road for civil outbreak in the future. “Further compromises and Supreme Court decisions would play a role in the great debates” over slavery and weather it should be completely abolished. Many people had feared the Missouri Compromise would break apart the union, but majority of the population had not recognized these threats for another four decades when Civil War unleased between the union and the Confederacy where the issue of slavery was ultimately

Show More
Related

Why Did Missouri Compromise Deal With The Sectional Conflict Over Slavery

160 Words | 1 Pages

I don’t think that the Missouri Compromise dealt with the sectional conflict over slavery. Even with many of the people upset with the compromise congress went ahead and passed it or shove it out of the way. The Missouri Compromise did nothing but intensified the conflict over slavery between the North and the South taking away the grip of the Northern states. Missouri was considered a slave state, making it so the north could outlaw slavery above the 36° 30° line and the south expanded their region of slavery. The Missouri Compromise split the democratic republican alliance which held most of national politics for about twenty years.

Read More

Why Did The Missouri Compromise Cause The Civil War

67 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri compromise was an agreement between the north and south. It allowed Missouri to be the 24th state. Maine was also established, therefore Missouri was a free state. The Mason Dixon line was established, this created a line between the slave and free states. This rule was broken, and even more conflict was contributed to the start of the civil war.

Read More

Als Before The Events Of The Missouri Compromise

1891 Words | 8 Pages

The Missouri Compromise however had effects larger than simply distributing the land. The Missouri Compromise would further prevent a larger conflict between the north, and south in the immediate future. This made both sides even more restless to fight for their respective causes. The compromise

Read More

Dbq Missouri Compromise

595 Words | 3 Pages

Leslie Chihuahua United States History to 1877 11/13/2015 11:00-11:50 AM Missouri Compromise was an agreement from the House of Representatives to reach a median to keep slavery out of Missouri after all the tribulations it had caused before it became a state. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House made important decisions in order for Missouri to be admitted as a state that could impact American history. In 1819, slavery was a resourceful profit to slave owners and this sparked a sectional controversy in the country over the efforts to expand slavery into the new western territories. The country had 22 states, eleven free eleven slave, and the line between them were distinguished by the northern and western boundaries of Pennsylvania and the Ohio River. (Txt.

Read More

Explaining The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854

89 Words | 1 Pages

Also, I will be explaining what the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was. January of 1854 Sen. Stephen Douglas wrote a bill that would divide the land in the west of Missouri into two states Nebraska and Kansas. Douglas wanted popular sovereignty for both states; this would allow the residents of the two states to vote on if slavery would be legal in new states. Groups against slavery were against Douglas’s push for popular sovereignty, because without the ability to vote slavery would not be allowed in the new

Read More

To What Extent Was The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854

1383 Words | 6 Pages

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a bill that essentially disregarded and relinquished the Missouri Compromise. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that any westward expansion of the United States was to have the decision on slavery made via popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty, in regards to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, was the idea that the decision on slavery in a region should be decided by the people who live there. This seemed fair, but the issue with instating popular sovereignty was that the parameters of the Missouri Compromise stated that slavery could not exist anywhere above the 36°30° line (History.com). Therefore, popular sovereignty would entirely disregard important factors of the Missouri Compromise, which was regarded by many as a strong force in holding the Union

Read More

Why Is Missouri Compromise Necessary

144 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was necessary because the south wanted slavery to continue while the nation was growing. Most states in the North had outlawed slavery. However, the South did not want slavery to end because it was the foundation of the economy and plantations. So the Missouri Compromise was made to keep the balance of slave states and free states. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state and Maine joined as a free state.

Read More

The Missouri Compromise: The Fire Of War

139 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was definite attempt by the government to shove the issue out of view. By the time the Missouri Compromise was introduced, a few northern states were already in the process of abolishing slavery, as was England. The government was finally recognizing the cruelties of slavery but did not want to anger the southern plantation owners. Thus, they created the Missouri Compromise in order to ease their guilt and face the least contempt. The Missouri Compromise was only able to increase the brewing conflict of slavery between northern states and southern states.

Read More

Why Did The South Win The Civil War Research Paper

1985 Words | 8 Pages

To please the South, slavery would be prohibited forever from Louisiana Purchase territories n orth of 36° 30'. Southern extremists opposed any limit on the extension of slavery, but settled for now. Missouri and Maine were to enter statehood simultaneously to preserve sectional equality in the Senate. For almost a generation this Compromise seemed to settle the conflict between the North and South. But in 1848 the Union acquired a huge piece of territory from Mexico.

Read More

Compromise Of 1820 Research Paper

394 Words | 2 Pages

The Compromise of 1820 was about the issue of slavery in new territories. Initially Missouri wanted to be admitted to the Union as a slave state, but this would interfere with the balance between free states and slave states. If Missouri were to be admitted as a slave state the South would have more power in the Senate than the North. During the next session of congress Maine applied to the Union as a free state. By adding Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state the Senate’s equilibrium would be established again.

Read More

Missouri Compromise Essay

509 Words | 3 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was an attempt by the United States government to diffuse the issue of slavery. The issue of slavery had arisen in the recent years due to the expansion of the country. The question of slavery in every new territory rocked the nation. The Missouri Compromise was one of the government’s last attempts to fix it diplomatically.

Read More

Was The Compromise Of 1850 Justified To Delay The Civil War

1168 Words | 5 Pages

Initially, the first Missouri compromise of 1820 was an agreement between South and North involving primarily the regulation of slavery in the western territory. It prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel of 36, 30' line except within the boundary of the proposed state of Missouri. In other words, the imaginary 36, 30 lines across the southern border of Missouri stated that anything above that line is a free state and anything below that line is a sate. The issue of this compromise was that the admission of Missouri as a slave state would give slave states (southern) control over the senate. This crisis was averted when Maine was admitted to the union to balance out the states.

Read More

What Caused The Civil War Dbq

1122 Words | 5 Pages

These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.

Read More

Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1121 Words | 5 Pages

However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

Read More

Missouri Compromise Essay

1563 Words | 7 Pages

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).

Read More

More about Impact Of The Missouri Compromise

Related Topics

Open Document