ipl-logo

Dbq Missouri Compromise

595 Words3 Pages

Leslie Chihuahua United States History to 1877 11/13/2015 11:00-11:50 AM
Missouri Compromise was an agreement from the House of Representatives to reach a median to keep slavery out of Missouri after all the tribulations it had caused before it became a state. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House made important decisions in order for Missouri to be admitted as a state that could impact American history. In 1819, slavery was a resourceful profit to slave owners and this sparked a sectional controversy in the country over the efforts to expand slavery into the new western territories. The country had 22 states, eleven free eleven slave, and the line between them were distinguished by the northern and western boundaries of Pennsylvania and the Ohio River. (Txt. pg. 315)
Slavery still lingered into the northern parts of the boundary, but no move had been made to move the line across the Mississippi River and into the Louisiana territory. At the time, the Missouri territory was the Louisiana territory except the Louisiana state and the Arkansas territory, and southerners were vastly moving to the west with their slaves. (Txt. pg. 315) The Missouri territory would soon reach the minimum of sixty thousand white settlers which then would need to …show more content…

(Text. pg. 316) Tallmadge wanted to make Missouri a free state and prohibited slaves into Missouri, and any slave born in Missouri would be freed after the age of 25. (Ch. 8 Powerpoint). This was a problem for the south, because they relied on slaves for profit and moving westward would allow the southern states to gain more slave states. Although The Tallamadge Amendment prohibited slavery, if passed, southern congressman threatened and this could lead to civil war, but the Tallamadge Amendment was never passed. This foreshadowed Missouri to become more of a slave state because southern states pushed for Missouri to become a slave

Show More
Related
154 Words | 1 Pages

Eventually, Missouri joined the Congress as a slave. Meanwhile, Marne became a free state. Then, the area that was north of 36°30’ line could not have slavery. The Monroe Doctrine was declared by President Monroe in 1823.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

Read More
211 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise wanted that to end. At the time, this compromise was seen as a critical agreement to preserve the balance of Congress. The United States congress admitted Missouri to the union as a state that allowed slavery and Maine as a free state. This ended up as Missouri being a free state and ending the slavery debate. The Kansas-Nebraska act, also known as the “Bleeding-Kansas” was the act that allowed

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

In the era before the Civil War America was expanding westward. The Louisiana Purchase and other lands gained help to give America new land to expand on, but this leaded to issues with the division of free and slave states. As Missouri became a state they wanted to become a slave state, which caused trouble. In order to keep equilibrium between the states, Congress came up with the Missouri Compromise of 1820.The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state and Maine a free state. The Treaty also made a line within the Louisiana Territory to keep slavery from moving up the

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

South Carolina nullifying the tariff and threatening to secede from the United States in which congress passes the force act which enforce the federal tariffs. The disappointment of the tariff of 1828 and 1832 lead Jackson to create the tariff of 1833 which reduced the previewer’s tax from 20%. The tariffs showed the growing tension between the north and south that lead up to the civil war. One of the most controversial compromise of the 19th century United States was the Missouri compromise which admitted Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave ban slavery on the Louisiana territory. The compromise were made to balance the power of slave and Free states.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The “Era of Good Feelings,” from 1815-1825, was not an accurate label of the period after the War of 1812 because of various conflicts in economic nationalism , disagreements in politics, and the disunion of the citizens. In addition, several sectional issues emerged, mostly between the North and the South, regarding to the Tariff of 1816 and the conflict over slavery. Both nationalism and sectionalism had a great influence on whether the period from 1815-1825 was actually the “Era of Good Feelings.” Despite the fact that nationalism was emerging, it also caused many economic issues, thus, the “Era of Good Feelings” was not labeled accurately. After the War of 1812, many Americans had a feeling of patriotism in the 1820s when they were still celebrating the Fourth of July after many years, which shows how unified the citizens were.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

The conflict of slavery split both major parties along sectional lines. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was over slavery. Missouri was above the 36 ’30-degree line beyond the Mississippi, which went against the precedent of no slavery in the area. The Mexican war promoted a decade long debate over the expansion of slavery into the newly acquired lands, which lead to the Compromise of 1850. Following the compromise of 1850, other tension arose.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

The North and South were divided on whether or not slavery was permitted to exist. When the Missouri Compromise was made, it maintained balance by “allowing Missouri to enter as a slave state and Maine as a free state”[4]. Such balance was vital, because in the perspective of the North, the better the containment of slavery in the south, the less of a chance that it could spread. Furthermore, in terms of sectional tensions, the Missouri Compromise proved adequate short term. It’s advocation of the rights of citizens gave the people of Missouri the option to create a state government that could “write a state constitution that would permit slavery”[2].

Read More
2124 Words | 9 Pages

If this was granted to Missouri there would then be an unequal number of slave states and Free states. The solution to this was to grant the request of the state of Missouri to be a slave state but let Maine be a free state. Congress also passed an amendment that established

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

The vast territories gained with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, opened up a slew of disputed between the North and South over the issue regarding slavery and its expansion west. The possibility of western states becoming slave states created the greatest debate of the nineteenth century. In 1819, there were an equal number of free states and slave states which maintained a delicate balance of representatives in the senate. However, when Missouri applied for statehood into the Union as a slave state it threatened to break the delicate balance and grant political representation in favor of the South. Desperately trying to prevent this balance from breaking, Representative James Tallmadge Jr. of New York, proposed a resolution to ban the transport

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

This compromise caused loads of controversy because the Southern senators believed that the territories should be able to decide for themselves if they should allow slavery or not, like the original 13 states. The Southern senators thought the compromise was unconstitutional. On the other hand, the Northern senators argued that Congress actually had the right to say ban slavery in new states. I understand why the Missouri Compromise was created, but I believe that the compromise made the situation worse. To me it was unconstitutional of Congress to deny new states the right to decide if they should allow slavery or not.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The Southern states even threatened to secede because of the differences in opinion on slavery. To prevent this, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state, but in exchange, Maine was admitted as a free state. In addition, all states and lands north of the 36°30’ parallel would be free (except for Missouri). This ‘compromise’ somehow managed to hold America together, but no one was really satisfied.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

He was famous for his insistence on the annexation of Texas. The acquisition of such western lands fed northern fear of the Slave Power Slave masters from the South held a conspiracy to maintain their traditional slaveholding ways when moving to acquired territory. The Southern white threatened the idealism of the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise was an effort by Congress to defuse the sectional and political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri late in 1819 for admission as a state in which slavery would be permitted. A line was also drawn through the unincorporated western territories along the 36⁰30 parallel which divided the north and south as free and slave states.

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

At the time, there was not a way to completely settle the issue, but there was a way to ease some of the dispute between the states. The Missouri compromise was made to alleviate some of the conflicts over slavery. Slavery all started in 1619 in America when African slaves were taken to Jamestown, Virginia (history.com 2017). Slavery was an acceptable practice throughout the country in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (history.com 2009). African American slaves were taken from their homes and brought to America to be put in other peoples homes and do work (gilderlehrman.org 2009).

Read More

More about Dbq Missouri Compromise

Related Topics

Open Document